Method and means for improving bowel health

ABSTRACT

A method and composition for improving one or more indicators of bowel health or metabolic health in a mammalian animal. This comprises the delivering to the gastrointestinal tract of the animal an effective amount of an altered wheat starch in the form of or derived from the grain of a wheat plant. The proportion of amylose in the starch of the grain is at least 30% and/or the grain comprises a reduced level of SBEIIa enzyme activity and/or protein relative to wild-type grain.

This application is a divisional of U.S. Ser. No. 11/324,063, filed Dec.30, 2005, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No.60/688,944, filed Jun. 8, 2005; and claims priority of AustralianProvisional Application No. 2004907350, filed Dec. 30, 2004, the contentof all of which are hereby incorporated by reference into the subjectapplication.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to methods of improving the health of mammalsincluding humans by the use of diets including modified wheat. Theinvention also relates to wheat products with properties includingincreased levels of resistant starch or a high relative amylose contentthat provide for improved bowel health.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Serious non-infectious chronic illnesses relating to diet and lifestyleare major causes of morbidity and mortality in affluent industrialisedcountries and also in emerging ones with greater affluence. Theseinclude coronary heart disease, diverticular disease, certain cancers(especially of the colon and rectum) and diabetes. Cereal foods havesignificant potential to improve human health through lowering the riskof these conditions. The benefits may be obtained through consumption ofprocessed foods containing whole grains or their constituents includingcomplex carbohydrates—starch and non-starch polysaccharides (NSP, majorcomponents of dietary fibre). NSP are resistant to digestion by humansmall intestinal enzymes which helps to explain their effectiveness inincreasing faecal bulk and relieving constipation (Topping & Clifton,2001). While starch can be digested (theoretically to completion) in thehuman small intestine, some escapes into the large bowel. This fractionis resistant starch (RS) which, together with a variable fraction ofNSP, is metabolised by the large bowel microflora (Topping & Clifton,2001). Short chain fatty acids (SCFA) are major end products of thisfermentation and they promote important aspects of large bowelfunction-stimulation of fluid and electrolyte absorption, modulation ofmuscular contraction and visceral perfusion (Topping & Clifton, 2001).One of the principal SCFA, butyrate, may also play a role in promoting anormal phenotype in colonocytes, and enhancing normally controlledcolonocyte proliferation and lowering the risk of colo-rectal cancer.The latter malignancy is a substantial cause of early morbidity inaffluent industrialised countries. A further consequence of slowerstarch small intestinal digestibility is the potential to lower the rateof entry of glucose into the circulation and, thus, a lesser demand forinsulin. This is measured as glycaemic index (GI) which is emerging as asubstantial factor in disease risk.

It is emerging also that many of the actions ascribed to dietary fibremay actually be due to RS (Topping & Clifton, 2001). RS intakes are lowin populations at high risk of the diseases of affluence andmodification of convenience foods to enhance the content and action ofRS is considered to be an effective means of improving nutrition forpublic health at the population level. This may be put into practicethrough encouraging the consumption of specific foods, such as beans orwholegrain (brown) rice, which are intrinsically high in RS. Anotherapproach is to enrich convenience foods with RS as an added ingredient.

Wheat is a staple food in many countries and supplies approximately 20%of the food kilojoules for the total world population. The processingcharacteristics of wheat make it the preferred base for mostcereal-based processed products such as bread, pasta and noodles. Wheatconsumption is increasing world-wide with increasing affluence.Breadwheat (Triticum aestivum) is a hexaploid having three differentgenomes, A, B and D, and most of the known genes in wheat are present intriplicate, one on each genome. The hexaploid nature of the breadwheatgenome makes finding and combining gene mutations in each of the threegenomes a challenge. The presence of three genomes has a bufferingeffect by masking mutations in individual genomes, in contrast to themore readily identified mutations in diploid species. Known variation inwheat starch structure has been limited relative to the variationavailable in maize or rice. Another contributing factor to this is thatthe transformation efficiency of wheat has lagged behind that for othercereals.

The synthesis of starch in the endosperm of higher plants is carried outby a suite of enzymes that catalyse four key steps. Firstly, ADP-glucosepyrophosphorylase activates the monomer precursor of starch through thesynthesis of ADP-glucose from G-1-P and ATP. Secondly, the activatedglucosyl donor, ADP-glucose, is transferred to the non-reducing end of apre-existing α1-4 linkage by starch synthases. Thirdly, starch branchingenzymes introduce branch points through the cleavage of a region ofα-1,4 linked glucan followed by transfer of the cleaved chain to anacceptor chain, forming a new α-1,6 linkage. Starch branching enzymesare the only enzymes that can introduce the α-1,6 linkages intoα-polyglucans and therefore play an essential role in the formation ofamylopectin. Finally, starch debranching enzymes remove some of thebranch linkages although the mechanism through which they act isunresolved (Myers et al., 2000).

While it is clear that at least these four activities are required fornormal starch granule synthesis in higher plants, multiple isoforms ofeach of the four activities are found in the endosperm of higher plantsand specific roles have been proposed for individual isoforms on thebasis of mutational analysis (Wang et al, 1998, Buleon et al., 1998) orthrough the modification of gene expression levels using transgenicapproaches (Abel et al., 1996, Jobling et al., 1999, Sewall et al.,2000). However, the precise contributions of each isoform of eachactivity to starch biosynthesis are still not known, and it is not knownwhether these contributions differ markedly between species. In thecereal endosperm, two isoforms of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase arepresent, one form within the amyloplast, and one form in the cytoplasm(Denyer et al., 1996, Thorbjornsen et al., 1996). Each form is composedof two subunit types. The shrunken (sh2) and brittle (bt2) mutants inmaize represent lesions in large and small subunits respectively (Girouxand Hannah, 1994). Four classes of starch synthase are found in thecereal endosperm, an isoform exclusively localised within the starchgranule, granule-bound starch synthase (GBSS), two forms that arepartitioned between the granule and the soluble fraction (SSI, Li etal., 1999a, SSII, Li et al., 1999b) and a fourth form that is entirelylocated in the soluble fraction, SSIII (Cao et al, 2000, Li et al.,1999b, Li et al, 2000). GBSS has been shown to be essential for amylosesynthesis (Shure et al., 1983), and mutations in SSII and SSIII havebeen shown to alter amylopectin structure (Gao et al, 1998, Craig etal., 1998). No mutations defining a role for SSI activity have beendescribed.

Three forms of branching enzyme are expressed in the cereal endosperm,branching enzyme I (SBEI), branching enzyme IIa (SBEIIa) and branchingenzyme IIb (SBEIIb) (Hedman and Boyer, 1982, Boyer and Preiss, 1978,Mizuno et al., 1992, Sun et al., 1997). Genomic and cDNA sequences havebeen characterized for rice (Nakamura and Yamanouchi, 1992), maize (Babaet al., 1991; Fisher et al., 1993; Gao et al., 1997) and wheat (Repellinet al., 1997; Nair et al., 1997; Rahman et al., 1997). Sequencealignment reveals a high degree of sequence similarity at both thenucleotide and amino acid levels and allows the grouping into the SBEI,SBEIIa and SBEIIb classes. SBEIIa and SBEIIb generally exhibit around80% sequence identity to each other, particularly in the central regionsof the genes. SBEIIa and SBEIIb may also be distinguished by theirexpression patterns. SBEIIb in maize is specifically expressed inendosperm while SBEIIa is present in every tissue of the plant.

In wheat endosperm, SBEI (Morell et al, 1997) is found exclusively inthe soluble fraction, while SBEIIa and SBEIIb are found in both solubleand starch-granule associated fractions (Rahman et al., 1995). In maizeand rice, high amylose phenotypes have been shown to result from lesionsin the SBEIIb gene, also known as the amylase extender (ae) gene (Boyerand Preiss, 1981, Mizuno et al., 1993; Nishi et al., 2001). In theseSBEIIb, mutants, endosperm starch grains showed an abnormal morphology,amylose content was significantly elevated, the branch frequency of theresidual amylopectin was reduced and the proportion of short chains(<DP17, especially DP8-12) was lower. Moreover, the gelatinisationtemperature of the starch was increased. In addition, there was asignificant pool of material that was defined as “intermediate” betweenamylose and amylopectin (Boyer et al., 1980, Takeda, et al., 1993b). Incontrast, maize plants mutant in the SBEIIa gene due to a mutator (Mu)insertional element and consequently lacking in SBEIIa proteinexpression were indistinguishable from wild-type plants in the branchingof endosperm starch (Blauth et al., 2001), although they were altered inleaf starch. Similarly, rice plants deficient in SBEIIa activityexhibited no significant change in the amylopectin chain profile inendosperm (Nakamura 2002). In both maize and rice, the SBEIIa and SBEIIbgenes are not linked in the genome.

Mutations in wheat SBEIIa or SBEIIb or the phenotypes of wheat linescarrying these mutations have not been reported. Known mutants in wheatare for the waxy gene (GBSS, Zhao and Sharp, 1998) and a mutant entirelylacking the SGP-1 protein (Yamamori et al, 2000) which was produced bycrossing lines which were lacking the A, B and D genome specific formsof SGP-1 (SSII) protein as assayed by protein electrophoresis.Examination of the SSII null seeds showed that the mutation resulted inalterations in amylopectin structure, deformed starch granules, and anelevated relative amylose content to about 30-37% of the starch, whichwas an increase of about 8% over the wild-type level (Yamamori et al.,2000). Amylose was measured by colorimetric measurement, amperometrictitration (both for iodine binding) and a concanavalin A method. Starchfrom the SSII null mutant exhibited a decreased gelatinisationtemperature compared to starch from an equivalent, non-mutant plant.Starch content was reduced from 60% in the wild-type to below 50% in theSSII-null grain.

In maize, the dull1 mutation causes decreased starch content andincreased amylose levels in endosperm, with the extent of the changedepended on the genetic background, and increased degree of branching inthe remaining amylopectin (Shannon and Garwood, 1984). The genecorresponding to the mutation was identified and isolated by atransposon-tagging strategy using the transposon mutator (Mu) and shownto encode the enzyme designated starch synthase II (SSII) (Gao et al.,1998). The enzyme is now recognized as a member of the SSIII family incereals (Li et al., 2003). Mutant endosperm had reduced levels of SBEIIaactivity associated with the dull1 mutation. No corresponding mutationhas been reported in other cereals. It is not known if these findingsare relevant to other cereals, for example wheat.

Two types of debranching enzymes are present in higher plants and aredefined on the basis of their substrate specificities, isoamylase typedebranching enzymes, and pullulanase type debranching enzymes (Myers etal., 2000). Sugary-1 mutations in maize and rice are associated withdeficiency of both debranching enzymes (James et al., 1995, Kubo et al.,1999) however the causal mutation maps to the same location as theisoamylase-type debranching enzyme gene. Representative starch branchingenzyme sequences from genes that have been cloned from cereals arelisted in Table 1.

TABLE 1 Starch branching enzyme genes characterized from cereals. Typeof Species SBE isoform clone Accession No. Reference Wheat SBEI cDNA andAJ237897 SBEI gene) Baga et al., 1999 genomic AF002821 (SBEI pseudogeneRahman et al., 1997, AF076680 (SBEI gene) Rahman et al., 1999 AF076679(SBEI cDNA) SBEI cDNA Y12320 Repellin et al., 1997 SBEIIa cDNA Y11282Nair et al., 1997 SBEIIa cDNA and AF338432 (cDNA) Rahman et al., 2001genomic AF338431 (gene) SBEIIb cDNA and WO 01/62934 genomic SBEIIb cDNAWO 00/15810 Rice SBEI cDNA D10752 Nakamura and Yamanouchi, 1992 SBEIgenomic D10838 Kawasaki et al., 1993 RBE3 cDNA D16201 Mizuno et al.,1993 Barley SBEIIa and cDNA and AF064563 (SBEIIb gene) Sun et al., 1998SBEIIb genomic AF064561 (SBEIIb cDNA) AF064562 (SBEIIa gene) AF064560(SBEIIa cDNA) Maize SBEI cDNA U17897 Fisher et al., 1996 genomicAF072724 Kim et al., 1998a SBEIIb cDNA L08065 Fisher et al., 1993genomic AF072725 Kim et al., 1998 SBEIIa cDNA U65948 Gao et al., 1997

Starch composition, in particular the form called resistant starch whichmay be associated with high amylose content, has important implicationsfor bowel health, in particular health of the large bowel. Thebeneficial effects of resistant starch are thought to result from theprovision of a nutrient to the large bowel wherein the intestinalmicroflora are given an energy source which is fermented to form interalia short chain fatty acids. These short chain fatty acids providenutrients for the colonocytes, enhance the uptake of certain nutrientsacross the large bowel and promote physiological activity of the colon.Generally if resistant starches or other dietary fibre are not providedthe colon is metabolically relatively inactive.

Whilst chemically or otherwise modified starches can be utilised infoods that provide functionality not normally afforded by unmodifiedsources, such processing has a tendency to either alter other componentsof value or carry the perception of being undesirable due to processesinvolved in modification. Therefore it is preferable to provide sourcesof constituents that can be used in unmodified form in foods.

Although high amylose maize and barley varieties are known, productsfrom these cereals have disadvantages compared to a very high amylosewheat for products where wheat is the preferred cereal, for example inbread, pasta or noodles. There is therefore an opportunity for a largescale improvement in public health including bowel health and metabolichealth through the alteration of wheat starch, which may provide anincrease in resistant starch and reduction in glycemic index whenprovided in the diet.

On passage from the ileum, resistant starches are metabolised by theanaerobic microflora of the caecum and colon which produce the enzymesnecessary for polysaccharide hydrolysis and catabolism. Breakdown iseffected by bacterial species very similar to those found in the rumenof obligate herbivores and with very similar products: gases, such ascarbon dioxide, methane and hydrogen, and short chain fatty acids(SCFA). The principle SCFA formed are acetate, propionate and butyratein the rough molar proportions 60:20:20. These three acids contributesome 80-90% of total colonic SCFA, the remainder being branched chainand other fatty acids formed from the breakdown of dietary andendogenous protein. Animals fed resistant starch have shown highercolonic SCFA and in some cases increased bacterial mass in the colon.Many of the effects of resistant starch in the colon are probablymediated through SCFA.

The role of dietary fibre in the prevention and management of simpleconstipation is beyond question. Fibres vary in their effects on bowelfunction. Cereal brans such as wheat and rice brans that are high ininsoluble NSP appear to be most effective in easing problems of laxationthrough shortening transit time, softening stools through raised waterholding, increasing stool volume and weight in the form of bacteria andundigested and non-fermentable material.

Although it is convenient to explain the actions of fibre-rich foodssuch as wheat bran solely in terms of stool mass, this is not quitecorrect. However, the increase in faecal bulk in humans eating mixeddiets is considerably higher than predicted from their non starchpolysaccharide content—the “carbohydrate gap” (Stephen (1991) Can JPhysiol. Pharmacol. 69:116-20). Starch is thought to fill this gap andcontribute to the greater faecal bulk through bacterial proliferation,by providing a fermentation substrate, (both glucose, and certain SCFA)as well as providing physical bulk.

Increases in microbial mass from undigestible carbohydrate fermentationcontributes directly to stool bulk, which is a large part of the stoolweight. Bacteria are about 80% water and have the ability to resistdehydration, as such they contribute to water-holding in fecal material.The number of bacteria in human feces is approximately 4×10¹¹-8×10¹¹/gdry feces, and makes up to about 50% of fecal solids in subjects on aWestern diet. Gas production from colonic fermentation can also havesome influence on stool bulk. Trapping of gas can contribute toincreased volume and a decrease in fecal transit time.

The metabolic end products of fermentation, namely the gases, SCFA andincreased microflora play a pivotal role in the physiological effects ofthe undigestible carbohydrate in the colon and implications for localeffects in the colon and systemic effects. The gases produced fromfermentation by strict anaerobic species such as bacteriodes, somenon-pathogenic species of clostridia and yeasts, anaerobic cocci andsome species of lactobacilli are mostly released as flatulence or areabsorbed and subsequently lost from the body through the lungs. However,some of the hydrogen and carbon dioxide produced from these microfloramay be further metabolized to methane (CH₄) by methanogenic bacteria,thus reducing intestinal gas pressure. Of these anaerobicmicroorganisms, the clostridia, eubacteria and anaerobic cocci are themost gas producing, while the bifidobacteria are the only group ofcommon gut microflora that do not produce any gases.

Because resistant starch is not digested or absorbed, it also serves asa prebiotic for beneficial bacteria, such as bifidobacteria andlactobacilli. Multiplying beneficial bacteria reduce the pH level in thecolon, making the environment uninhabitable for potentially harmfulbacteria such as E. coli, clostridia, Veillonella and Klebsiella. Theproliferation of beneficial bacteria provides significant healtheffects, including enhanced digestion and improved lactose intolerance,promoting the recycling of compounds such as estrogen, synthesizingvitamins, especially B-group vitamins, producing immune-stimulatingcompounds, inhibiting the growth of harmful bacteria, reducing theproduction of toxins and carcinogens, restoring normal intestinalbacteria during antibiotic therapy, and reducing the potential forseveral pathologies commonly associated with higher numbers ofpathogenic intestinal bacteria. These include autoimmune illnesses suchas ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis, certain cancers,yeast overgrowth, vaginitis, urinary tract infections, cirrhosis of theliver, food poisoning, antibiotic-associated diarrhea, inflammatorybowel diseases such as ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease,necrotizing entercolitis and ileocecitis, food allergy and intolerance,intestinal gas and bloating, and irritable bowel syndrome.

The primary SCFA generated by fermentation are acetate, propionate andbutyrate, accounting for 83-95% of the total SCFA concentration in thelarge intestine, which ranges from about 60-150 μmol/L. Theconcentrations of these acids are highest where concentrations ofmicroflora are also highest, namely in the cecum and right or transversecolon. Corresponding to these higher acid levels, the pH is alsotypically lowest in the transverse colon (5.4-5.9) and graduallyincreases through the distal colon to 6.6-6.9. As the pH is reduced, thecolonic environment becomes less favorable for toxin-producing andill-health promoting microflora, such as E. coli, clostridia, andcertain yeasts.

The pH range of digesta in the human colon needs to be established butin pigs on high fibre diets it ranges from approximately 6 in theproximal colon to >7 in the distal colon. The pKa of short chain fattyacids is <4.8 so that in the colon they are present largely as anions.SCFA are absorbed in the non-ionic form and are then ionized atintracellular pH to H⁺ and SCFA which are then exchanged for luminal Na⁺and Cl⁻ respectively. Some of the SCFA are also metabolized to HCO₃which is also exchanged for chloride ions. Therefore SCFA is beneficialin facilitating transporting ions that play an important role inmetabolism.

Thus SCFA do not contribute to osmotic load to any great extent and mayameliorate diarrhoea through removal of sodium and water from thecolonic lumen. However, because SCFA are present largely as anions,their absorption is relatively slow. For this reason and their presencein faeces, SCFA have been assumed to cause diarrhoea. That view is nolonger held and diarrhoea is thought to occur only when the osmoticpressure of simple and complex carbohydrates in the colon raises thefluid volume excessively and bacteria cannot break down the carbohydratesufficiently rapidly. In fact SCFA may have longer term preventativeeffects by stimulating growth of colonocytes thereby increasing thecapacity of the colon.

Epidemiological data have shown that the level of dietary fibre isinversely related to incidence of bowel cancer and a meta-analysis of alarge number of studies showed that fibre was protective in over 50%. Itis not possible to discriminate the type of NSP or foods that wereeffective. A study by Cassidy et al (British Journal of Cancer 69;937-942 (1994)) has shown that starch plays a protective role.

The role of fibre in the maintenance of colonic mucosal integrity isunderstood imperfectly. Experiments with animal models such as pigs haveshown that the weight and thickness of the colon is increased with dietshigh in fibre—consistent with greater cell growth. The effect is notconfined to fibre as Goodlad and Mathers ((1990) Brit J Nutr. 64;569-587) have obtained similar increases in the hindgut of rats feddiets high in resistant starch. Other studies with rats have shown thatthe increase is probably not due to increased mass of digesta since aninert faecal bulking agent (kaolin) did not stimulate mucosalproliferation. In the same experiments it was shown that colonicinfusion of short chain fatty acids enhanced colonocyte proliferationsuggesting that they were the trophic agents (Sakata J Nutr SciVitaminol 1986; 32: 355-362). It is likely that only propionate andbutyrate are involved in these effects. Propionate is known to enhancecolonic motility possibly through stimulating blood flow (Kvietis andGranger, Gastroenterol (1981); 80:962-969). Butyrate is thought to playa most critical role in the cell biology of colonocytes and is preferredover acetate and propionate as their oxidative fuel (Cummings, Gut(1981) 22:763-779). Butyrate inhibits the proliferation of malignantcells from the human colon in vitro via inhibition of DNA synthesis anarresting of the cells in the G₁ phase. Induction of celldifferentiation has also been demonstrated, an observation that isconsistent with the fact that when cells differentiate they lose theircapacity to proliferate. Butyrate also enhances the capacity of coloniccells to repair DNA damage (Smith, Carcinogenesis (1986) 7:423-429). Allof these effects require physical presence of the acid and are obtainedat butyrate concentrations similar to those found in the colon in vivo.A particular point of interest is that there is evidence that humanfaecal inocula ferment starch to butyrate (Pilch (ed) Physiologicaleffects and health consequences of dietary fibre. Bethesda Md. USA:FASEB 1987) and such production might explain inconsistencies inepidemiological data where fibre is not always protective but plantfoods are beneficial.

Several studies in animal models have shown that supplementation of thediet with fibre protects against tumours induced with chemicalcarcinogens such as dimethylhydrazine (DMH), azoxymethane (AOM), and3,2-dimethyl-4-aminobiphenyl (DMAB). Meta-analysis of these studies bythe Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB)(Pilch (1987) supra) showed that wheat bran was more effective thanpectin or cellulose in reducing lesion formation induced by chemicalcarcinogens. These data are paradoxical if one considers that solubleNSP might be expected to be fermented to SCFA more than wheat bran.However, rat studies show that wheat bran gives relatively higherconcentrations of butyrate in hind-gut digesta than soluble NSP. Inaddition, wheat bran seems to bind chemical carcinogens and to reducetheir colonic concentration and might be doing so in the animal modelsystems. A protective action of wheat against experimentalcarcinogenesis cannot be dismissed.

It is believed that butyrate enhances the proliferation of normal cellsbut may exert antineoplastic effects on susceptible cells andsignificantly retards the growth of human colon cancer cells in vitro(Kim et al In Malt and Williams (Eds) Colonic carcinogenesis. LancasterMTP Press, (192); Falk Symposium 31: 317-323). A recent study which hasshown that the molar proportion of butyrate is significantly lower infaeces from patients with adenomatous polyps (Weaner et al Gut (1988);29: 1539-1543) is of special interest as it suggests that short chainfatty acid production is abnormal. In a feeding trial in patient withpolyposis, a wheat bran supplement appeared to reduce polyp numbers andsize (De Cosse et al J Nat Cancer Inst. (1989); 81:1290-1297). This isalso a very promising study and indicates that insoluble NSP may beprotective. Of particular interest is the fact in this study aninsoluble NSP (which also enhances lactation) was protective. Thesituation was soluble NSP and resistant starch is unknown.

It is suggested that lack of luminal SCFAs lead in the short term tomuscular atrophy and in the long term to ‘nutritional colitis’. This isespecially evident in diversion colitis, which develops after completediversion of the faecal stream and subsides after restoration ofcolorectal continuity. Irrigation with SCFA for 2-3 weeks has resultedin resolution of inflammation. Ulcerative colitis has also beensuccessfully treated using butyrate enemas. (Scheppach et al (1992)Gasteroenterology; 103:51-56. Generally anti-inflammatory measures, suchas the use of anti inflammatory drugs, do have side effects and inparticular where large doses are used to overcome the naturaldegradation of those drugs in the small intestine before they reach thecolon. The use of SCFA on the other hand is seen as particularlybeneficial because they are naturally occurring and replace the use ofanti-inflammatory drugs such as NSAIDS, corticosteroids and other antiinflammatory drugs.

General

Those skilled in the art will be aware that the invention describedherein is subject to variations and modifications other than thosespecifically described. It is to be understood that the inventiondescribed herein includes all such variations and modifications. Theinvention also includes all such steps, features, compositions andcompounds referred to or indicated in this specification, individuallyor collectively, and any and all combinations of any two or more of saidsteps or features.

Throughout this specification, unless the context requires otherwise theword “comprise”, and variations such as “comprises” and “comprising”,will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated integer or step orgroup of integers or steps but not the exclusion of any other integer orstep or group of integers or steps. The present invention is not to belimited in scope by the specific embodiments described herein, which areintended for the purposes of exemplification only.Functionally-equivalent products, compositions and methods are clearlywithin the scope of the invention, as described herein.

Bibliographic details of the publications referred to by the inventorsin this specification are collected at the end of the description. Thereferences mentioned herein are hereby incorporated by reference intheir entirety. Reference herein to prior art, including any one or moreprior art documents, is not to be taken as an acknowledgment, orsuggestion, that said prior art is common general knowledge in Australiaor forms a part of the common general knowledge in Australia.

As used herein, the term “derived from” shall be taken to indicate thata particular integer or group of integers has originated from thespecies specified, but has not necessarily been obtained directly fromthe specified source.

The designation of nucleotide residues referred to herein are thoserecommended by the IUPAC-IUB Biochemical Nomenclature Commission,wherein A represents Adenine, C represents Cytosine, G representsGuanine, T represents Thymidine.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This invention results from a finding that products made from the grainobtained from modified wheat plants comprise sufficient resistant starchand/or lowered glycemic index to provide a health benefit when ingestedat levels which can be incorporated into food or beverage products orotherwise delivered to the gastrointestinal tract of a mammal. Thehealth benefit may relate to bowel health or metabolic health or both.

In a first aspect the invention provides a method of improving one ormore indicators of bowel health or metabolic health in a mammaliananimal, comprising the step of delivering to the gastrointestinal tractof said animal an effective amount of an altered wheat starch in theform of or derived from the grain of a wheat plant, wherein theproportion of amylose in the starch of the grain is at least 30% and/orwherein said grain comprises a reduced level of SBEIIa enzyme activityrelative to wild-type grain. The mammalian animal may be non-ruminant ormonogastric, for example a human.

In an embodiment, the grain comprises a genetic variation which leads toa reduction in the level of SBEIIa gene expression, SBEIIa enzymeactivity in the endosperm or both relative to wild-type grain, whichgenetic variation comprises a mutation of an SBEIIa gene or anintroduced nucleic acid which encodes an inhibitor of SBEIIa geneexpression. The altered wheat starch may comprise at least 2%, at least2.5% or at least 3% resistant starch.

The wheat plant may have a reduced level of SBEIIa or SBEIIa and SBEIIbenzyme activities relative to wild-type grain, and the proportion ofamylose in the starch of the grain may be at least 30%, more preferablyat least 35%, at least 40%, at least 45%, at least 50% or at least 55%.In an embodiment, the grain comprises a reduced level of SBEIIb protein,enzyme activity or both relative to wild-type grain. The wheat plant mayadditionally comprise a reduced level of SBEI protein, enzyme activityor both relative to wild-type grain. The wheat plant may additionallycomprise an altered level of an enzyme relative to wild-type gain,wherein said enzyme is ADP glucose pyrophosphorylase, GBSS, SSI, SSII,SSIII, phosphorylase, a debranching enzyme of an isoamylase type, or adebranching enzyme of a pullulanase type, or any combination of these.The altered level may be an increased level or a decreased level.

The amylopectin of the grain may be characterised in comprising areduced proportion of the 4-12 dp chain length fraction relative to theamylopectin of wild-type grain, as measured after isoamylase debranchingof the amylopectin.

The wheat plant or altered wheat starch may be any one or more of theforms described herein. It is thought that at least some of the alteredwheat starch is a resistant starch. The altered wheat starch may beblended with unaltered wheat starch in the form of grain, flour,wholemeal, purified starch or other forms, or similarly with non-wheatstarch or other food ingredients.

At least 10 g of altered wheat starch may be provided to a human per dayalthough the levels are preferably greater than 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40,45, 50 or 55 g per day.

However the invention may also encompass levels of delivery as low as atleast 1, 2 or 5 grams per day, or levels of delivery higher such as atleast 60, 70, 80, or 100 grams per day.

The altered wheat starch is preferably delivered to the mammal,particularly humans, orally. The starch may be delivered in the form ofwhole grain or milled, ground, pearled, rolled, kibbled, par-boiled orcracked grain, or as isolated starch or starch granules. Alternativelythe starch may be delivered as part of a food or beverage product whichmay be as a condiment. In a further alternative, the starch may bedelivered in the form of a pharmaceutical preparation suitable for oralingestion. It will be understood that whilst oral ingestion ispreferred, the invention also encompasses other means of delivery of thealtered wheat starch to the colon.

It may be advantageous also to modify the altered starch chemically.Chemical modification may include etherification, esterification,acidification, or reducing enzyme susceptibility by, for example, acidor enzyme thinning and cross bonding using difunctional reagents.Physical modification may include heating and crystallization. Suchmodifications may increase the level of resistant starches.

The indicators of improved bowel health may comprise, but are notnecessarily limited to:

-   -   i) decreased pH of the bowel contents,    -   ii) increased total SCFA concentration or total SCFA amount in        the bowel contents,    -   iii) increased concentration or amount of one or more SCFAs in        the bowel contents,    -   iv) increased fecal bulk,    -   v) increase in total water volume of bowel or faeces, without        diarrhea,    -   vi) improved laxation,    -   vii) increase in number or activity of one or more species of        probiotic bacteria,    -   viii) increase in fecal bile acid excretion,    -   ix) reduced urinary levels of putrefactive products,    -   x) reduced fecal levels of putrefactive products,    -   xi) increased proliferation of normal colonocytes,    -   xii) reduced inflammation in the bowel of individuals with        inflamed bowel,    -   xiii) reduced fecal or large bowel levels of any one of urea,        creatinine and phosphate in uremic patients, or    -   xiv) any combination of the above.

The pH of the bowel contents may be reduced by at least 0.1 pH unit,preferably at least 0.2 pH units. The one or more SCFA may be selectedfrom formate, acetate, propionate, butryate, succinate or branched formsthereof, but is preferably one of acetate, proprionate and butyrate andmore preferably butyrate.

Among the probiotic bacteria, bifidobacteria species are the mostprominent. Lactic acid bacteria are similarly included such as, forexample, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Lactobacillus acidophilus,Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus plantarum, or Streptococcus laeciumor Streptococcus thermophilus.

The indicators of improved metabolic health may comprise, but are notnecessarily limited to:

-   -   i) stabilisation of post-prandial glucose fluctuation,    -   ii) improved (lowered) glycemic response,    -   iii) reduced pro-prandial plasma insulin concentration,    -   iv) improved blood lipid profile,    -   v) lowering of plasma LDL cholesterol,    -   vi) reduced plasma levels of one or more of urea, creatinine and        phosphate in uremic patients,    -   vii) an improvement in a dysglucaemic response, or    -   viii) any combination of the above.

The invention includes a change of at least 1%, at least 2%, at least5%, at least 10%, at least 15%, at least 20%, at least 25%, at least30%, at least 35%, at least 40%, at least 45% or at least 50% in any oneor more of the bowel health or metabolic health indicators or both.

The method may be particularly beneficial in treating a human having anyone or more of the conditions: constipation, diarrhea, irritable bowelsyndrome, Crohn's disease, colorectal cancer, diverticular disease,ulcerative colitis, high blood LDL cholesterol, uremia resulting fromkidney disease or other diseases, or diabetes. Alternatively, the methodprovides for the prevention or reduced risk in a human of any one ormore of these conditions.

The decrease in the bowel contents is preferably at least 0.1 pH units,but may be at least 0.2, at least 0.3, at least 0.4 or at least 0.5 pHunits. The change in pH may be measured in faeces, or internally, forexample in the caecum, in the proximal colon or the distal colon.

The Short Chain Fatty Acids (SCFA), the concentration or total amount ofwhich may vary, can be any one or more of formates, acetate, propionate,butyrate, succinate or branched forms thereof. Preferably the SCFA isone or more of acetate, propionate or butyrate, and most preferably isbutyrate. Alternatively the change in concentration or total amount is apooled value of total SCFA or a selected group of one or more of them.The concentration change may be as measured in faeces, or internally,which may be in the caecum, the proximal colon, the distal colon or anycombination of these. The total amount may increase while theconcentration remains the same or even increases if the bowel contentsincrease in volume over time. The SCFA content is thus a measure of thetotal amount of one or more SCFA in either the caecum, proximal colon,or distal colon or two or more of these combined. The concentrations oramounts might exhibit an increase of at least 5%, at least 10%, at least15%, at least 20% or at least 50%.

Fecal bulk increases principally as a result of greater numbers ofbacteria that are supported in the caecum and colon. The volumes may bemeasured by an increase in quantity of feces, or may be measured in situby estimating the volume of cecal, proximal colon, or distal coloncontents, separately or as a combination of two of these or all three ofthese. The increase in volume might be at least 5%, at least 10%, atleast 15%, at least 20% or at least 50%.

The water volume of the bowel or faeces increases as a resultprincipally of increased number of bacteria. The water content can bemeasured by comparing the wet weight of the faeces or bowel contentswith dry weight after drying, the volume of water can be calculated fromthis decrease in weight. This increase in water volume might be incecal, proximal colon, or distal colon contents, separately or as acombination or two of these or all three of these. The increase involume might be at least 5%, at least 10%, at least 15%, at least 20% orat least 50%.

Laxation relates to the passage of solids from the bowel, and entailsmeasuring defecation in a quantitative and/or qualitative manner.Frequency of defecation is one aspect of laxation and thus the frequencyof defecation might increase at least 20%, at least 30%, at least 50%,or at least 100%. One qualitative measure relates to hardness of stools,whereby passage is easier, in contrast to constipation, but where stoolsare not so soft or loose as to constitute diarrhea. This measure mightbe considered related to the water volume of the feces and these mayincrease by 5%, at least 10%, at least 15%, at least 20% or at least50%.

The probiotic bacteria are generally considered those that might be goodfor bowel health, being non infectious and producing beneficialmetabolites as a result of their fermentation activities. Among theprobiotic bacteria, bifidobacterial species are the most prominent.Lactic acid bacteria are similarly included such as, for example,Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacilluscasei, Lactobacillus plantarum, Streptococcus faecium or Streptococcusthermophilus. Numbers of individual species or genera might individuallyor collective increase by at least 20%, at least 25% or at least 50%.There may also be a reduction in the number of bacterial species thathave a potentially adverse effect on the large bowel. Many such speciesare unable or less able to utilise resistant starch for energy comparedto the probiotic organisms. Examples of such adverse bacteria includesome Clostridia, Veillonella and Klebsiella.

Preferably the resistant starch enhances fecal bile acid excretion.Increased fecal bile acid excretion induces the liver to produce morebile acids, utilizing cholesterol as a substrate in the production ofthe bile acids. The liver can obtain cholesterol for the synthesis ofbile acids from the blood, lowering blood cholesterol concentrations.Alternatively this may simply be used as a general marker of bowelactivity, and clearance of bile. The build up of bile acids is alsothought to have at least a correlation to bowel pathogensis. Theincrease might be by at least 5%, at least 10%, at least 15%, at least20% or at least 50%. Similar decreases of plasma LDL cholesterol levelsmay also be exhibited.

Preferably the resistant starch also reduces urinary and fecal levels ofputrefactive products or indicators of putrefactive products. This isindicative of a reduced level of fermentation by putrefying bacteria inthe colon or caecum. Additionally these may be indicative of reducedsmall intestinal overgrowth. The level of these compounds can measuredfor, by example using HPLC or other techniques. Many of these compoundsare metabolic products or biproducts of protein or amino aciddegradation. Compounds may be urea, ammonia and other waste nitrogenproducts or sulfides and sulfur containing compounds including hydrogensulfide gas. Specific compounds that may be tested include but are notlimited to phenol, indole, skatole, and ammonia, p-cresol,4-ethylphenol, urea, ketones, and amines. The decrease may be by atleast 5%, at least 10%, at least 15%, at least 20% or at least 50%.

The reduction of inflammation of the bowel might be by at least 10%, atleast 20% or at least 50%.

In kidney failure there is a decrease in the glomerular filtration rateand the kidneys are unable to maintain homeostasis of the blood.Homeostatic balance of water, sodium, potassium, calcium and other saltsis no longer possible and nitrogenous wastes are not excreted. Retentionof water causes edema and as the concentration of hydrogen ionsincreases, acidosis develops. Nitrogenous wastes accumulate and acondition referred to as uremia develops in the blood and tissue.Examples of uremic toxins include, but are not limited to, ammonia,urea, creatinine, phenols, indoles, and middle molecular weightmolecules. There may also be an accumulation of phosphate.

Reduced kidney function is to some extent compensated for by theintestinal wall which also acts as a semipermeable membrane allowingsmall molecules to pass from the intestinal tract into the bloodstreamand preventing larger molecules from entering the circulation.Nitrogenous wastes such as urea, creatinine and uric acid, along withseveral other small and medium molecular weight compounds, flow into theintestine and equilibrate across the intestinal epithelium. The presentinvention enhances the capacity of the bowel and thus enhances removalof waste products across the bowel. This enhancement of bowel functionthus has a second very important function in uremic patients over andabove benefits that are provided for normal individuals. The capacity ofenhanced function can be measured by reduced levels of waste compoundsin urine associated with uremic patients such as, for example, urea,creatinine and phosphate. These may be reduced in level by at least 5%,at least 10%, at least 15%, at least 20% or at least 50%. Plasma levelsof these compounds, reduced to the same extent, may also be exhibited inpreferred embodiments of the invention in uremic patients.

After ingestion of food there is generally an initial excursion in bloodsugar levels, the rate of increase depending on the food ingested. Overa period of 1-2 hours in normal individuals, the blood sugar level isbrought down to a generally elevated level through production andfunction of insulin. However, it is desirable to have a lower rate ofincrease and lower peak level in the blood sugar, with the increaseprolonged over an extended period, not only in normal individuals buteven more so in individuals with diabetes or Insulin deficiency (ID). Aprolonged absorption of carbohydate from the bowel is also desirable,particularly in sufferers of diabetes, to counter the hypoglycaemia thatis often encountered, particularly at night time. Because it isrelatively resistant to digestion, the modified starch or wheat productof the present invention enhances glycemic control in healthyindividuals and particularly in the diabetic patient. An advantage ofthe present invention is therefore that it provides a composition havingeffectively low carbohydrate content and starch that is more slowlydigested.

Slower glucose absorption slows insulin release and reduces excessiveinsulin responses in response to rising blood glucose levels after ameal. This benefits pancreatic secretion of insulin by reducing both theglucose load and rate of glucose load over the initial phases of glucosedetection, absorption and metabolism by the body. Reduced rates ofglucose loading therefore reduces the stress on beta cells normallyassociated with the insulin response to rising glucose. Moreover, sloweror moderated glucose absorption permits more time for insulin tostimulate normal sugar metabolic routes. Consequently, insulin dependentmechanisms have more time to prepare for the arrival of sugars from theintestine. This moderation of glucose absorption improves short-terminsulin modulation in the liver, muscle, and adipose tissue.

Blood glucose measurements may be made by any number of methods. Thetiming of any blood glucose test may be material, and the presentinvention contemplates determining the fasting blood glucose level andespecially the post-prandial blood glucose level. In general, thedesirable fasting glucose level (pre-prandial) is 80 to 120 mg/dL, and anon-diabetic has a pre-prandial glucose level of less than 110 mg/dL.The desirable post-prandial level is 100 to 140 mg/dL, and anon-diabetic has a bedtime glucose level of less than 120 mg/dL. Underthe American Diabetes Clinical Practice Recommendations, additionalaction is recommended if the fasting blood glucose level is greater than140 mg/dL or the post-prandial glucose level is greater than 160 mg/dL.

In a preferred form, the post prandial glucose level after ingestion offood according to the present invention is less than about 160 mg/dL,more preferably less than about 155, 150, 145, 140, or 130 mg/dL.

The blood glucose response (peak level) resulting when the modifiedwheat or starch of this invention is utilized is preferably no more than50%, more preferably no more than 12% compared to when glucose ordextrose is used, while the blood glucose response (area under theconcentration/time curve) is no more than 75%, preferably no more than30%, even more preferably, no more than 10% of the blood glucoseresponse resulting when dextrose or glucose is used. The blood glucoseresponse (peak) is defined as the rise in blood glucose concentrationfrom the pre-feeding concentration to the peak concentration (usuallyoccurring within one hour after feeding), expressed as a percentage ofthe rise observed when an equivalent mass of glucose or dextrose is fed.

Similarly post prandial plasma insulin levels may be reduced by at least5%, at least 10%, at least 15%, at least 20% or at least 50% compared towhen unmodified wheat or starch is used.

The profile of lipids in the blood may be reflective of disorders oflipid synthesis and transport in the individual. Abnormal patterns ofblood lipid profile, also known a dyslipidemias, may be characterized byone or more of the following: elevated levels of total and low densitylipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, elevated levels of triglycerides (TG),low levels of high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, a high LDL/HDLratio, or elevated levels of WA (free fatty acids). An imbalance oflipids may also be exhibited in individuals that suffer from diabetes orhave syndrome X. Generally it is desired to reduce total plasmacholesterol (C), LDL-C and very low density lipoprotein triglycerides(VLDL-triglycerides) and TG, elevated levels of which are associatedwith health risks, while raising serum levels of HDL-C which isconsidered a “healthy” lipoprotein. The invention in a preferred formexhibits a variation of blood levels of these by at least 5%, at least10%, at least 15%, at least 20% or at least 25%.

Whilst the invention may be particularly useful in the treatment orprophylaxis of humans, it is to be understood that the invention is alsoapplicable to non-human animals including but not limited toagricultural animals such as cows, sheep, pigs and the like, domesticanimals such as dogs or cats, laboratory animals such as rabbits orrodents such as mice, rats, hamsters, or animals that might be used forsport such as horses. The method may be particularly applicable tonon-ruminant mammals or animals such as mono-gastric mammals. Theinvention may also be applicable to other agricultural animals forexample poultry including, for example, chicken, geese, ducks, turkeys,or quails, or fish.

The method of treating the animal, particularly humans, may comprise thestep of administering altered wheat grain, flour or starch to theanimal, in one or more doses, in an amount and for a period of timewhereby the level of the one or more of the bowel health or metabolicindicators improves. The indicator may change relative to consumption ofnon-altered wheat starch or wheat or product thereof, within a timeperiod of hours, as in the case of some of the indicators such as pH,elevation of levels of SCFA, post-prandial glucose fluctuation, or itmay take days such as in the case of increase in fecal bulk or improvedlaxation, or perhaps longer in the order of weeks or months such as inthe case where the butyrate enhanced proliferation of normal colonocytesis measured. It may be desirable that administration of the alteredstarch or wheat or wheat product be lifelong. However, there are goodprospects for compliance by the individual being treated given therelative ease with which the altered starch can be administered.

Dosages may vary depending on the condition being treated or preventedbut are envisaged for humans as being at least 1 g of altered starch perday, more preferably at least 2 g per day, preferably at least 10 or atleast 20 g per day. Administration of greater than about 100 grams perday may require considerable volumes of delivery and reduce compliance.Most preferably the dosage for a human is between 5 and 60 g of alteredstarch per day, or for adults between 5 and 100 g per day.

The altered wheat starch of the present invention is able to be readilyincorporated into food or beverage products at levels typically ingestedin normal human diets. Intake of at least about 10 g per day is thoughtto provide a measurable benefit, although more preferably the intakesare at least about 20-30 grams of the altered wheat starch per day.Typically, humans have daily intakes of at least 100 to 200 g of starchyfood products such as bread or pasta, which means that levels of alteredstarch in the food product of at least 5 to 10% will typically provide abeneficial effect. It is proposed that levels of less than that, forexample, as low as 1% will also give a beneficial effect which may ormay not be immediately measurable.

Thus a second aspect of the invention provides a food, beverage orpharmaceutical preparation comprising at least 1% (w/w) altered wheatstarch in the form of or derived from the grain of a wheat plant,wherein the proportion of amylose in the starch of the grain is at least30% and/or wherein said grain comprises a reduced level of SBEIIa enzymeactivity relative to wild-type grain. In an embodiment, the alteredwheat starch comprises at least 2% (w/w) resistant starch, preferably atleast 3%, at least 4%, at least 5%, at least 6% or at least 10%resistant starch, but the level may be higher perhaps at least 20%, 30%,40% or 50%. In another embodiment, the proportion of amylose in thealtered wheat starch derived from the grain is at least 30% (w/w),preferably at least 35%, at least 40%, at least 45%, at least 50%, atleast 65%, at least 70%, at least 75% or at least 80%.

In an embodiment, the food or beverage product comprises an ingredientcomprising the altered starch, wherein the ingredient is flour,wholemeal, semolina or substantially purified starch derived from thegrain. In a further embodiment, the food or beverage product comprisesflour, wholemeal, semolina or starch derived from another source.

The food, beverage or pharmaceutical preparation may comprise at least1% (w/w) resistant wheat starch derived from the grain of a wheat plantwherein the proportion of amylose in the starch of the grain is at least50%.

The food, beverage or pharmaceutical preparation may comprise at least1% altered or resistant wheat starch in the form of or derived from thegrain of a wheat plant, wherein the proportion of amylose in the starchof the grain is at least 30% and/or wherein said grain comprises areduced level of SBEIIa enzyme activity relative to wild-type grain.

The wheat plant may have a reduced level of SBEIIa or SBEIIa and SBEIIbenzyme activity relative to wild type grain and the proportion ofamylose in the starch of the grain may be at least 30% and morepreferably at least about 35%, at least 40%, at least 45%, at least 50%or at least 55%. In an embodiment, the grain comprises a reduced levelof SBEIIb protein, enzyme activity or both relative to wild-type grain.The wheat plant may additionally comprise a reduced level of SBEIprotein, enzyme activity or both relative to wild-type grain. The wheatplant may additionally comprise an altered level of one or more enzymesrelative to wild-type grain, wherein said enzyme may be ADP glucosepyrophosphorylase, GBSS, SSI, SSIIa, SSIIb, SSIII, phosphorylase, adebranching enzyme of an isoamylase type, or a debranching enzyme of apullulanase type. The altered level may be an increased level or adecreased level.

The amylopectin of the grain may have a reduced proportion of the 4-12dp chain length fraction relative to the amylopectin of wild-type grain,as measured after isoamylase debranching of the amylopectin.

The food or beverage product may have at least 2% (w/w), preferably atleast 3%, at least 4%, at least 5%, at least 6%, at least 8%, at least10%, at least 15%, at least 20%, at least 25%, at least 30%, at least35%, at least 40% or at least 50% altered or resistant wheat starch.

It is thought that heating or baking of the food product is preferredbecause this results in increased retrogradation of the starch oncooling and therefore may enhance the level of resistant starch. In anembodiment, the starch in the form of grain, flour, wholemeal or otherform, or the food, beverage or pharmaceutical preparation containing thestarch is heated to at least 60° C. for at least ten minutes one or moretimes, which may be prior to or during preparation of the food, beverageor pharmaceutical preparation, with subsequent cooling, to providegreater disruption of the starch granules and greater crystallization.The starch, food or beverage product is preferably heated to highertemperatures, preferably at least about 70° C., at least 80° C., atleast 90° C., at least 95° C. or at least 100° C., perhaps also in thepresence of elevated pressures.

The altered starch may be directly eaten as a powder or as an ediblecomposition comprising resistant starch and water, resistant starch andfood material, resistant starch in foods, resistant starch in beveragesor resistant starch and seasonings. The altered starch may beincorporated into fat or oil products such as margarine or shortening,salad dressing, egg products such as mayonnaise, dairy products such asmilk, yogurt or cheese, cereal products such as corn or wheat flour,fruit juices, other foods or food materials, or the altered starch maybe processed into beverages or foods such as bread, cake, biscuits,breakfast cereals, pasta, noodles or sauces. Other products includeprepacked mixes such as, for example, pancake or cake mixes.Alternatively, the altered wheat starch may be provided as apharmaceutical preparation preferably for orally administration such as,for example, tablets, capsules, granules, powders, syrups orsuspensions. Alternatively, these may be parenterally administered.

When incorporated into bread or other foods, the altered wheat starchmay be in the form of grain, flour, wholemeal or purified starch. It maybe used as a partial replacement for non-altered wheat forms and mayreplace at least 5% (w/w), at least 10%, at least 15%, at least 20%, atleast 25%, at least 30%, at least 35%, at least 40%, at least 45%, atleast 50% or more of the non-altered form using in conventionalformulations. For breads, the replacement is preferably in the range of10% to 100% or 50% to 100%. This may assist to minimise the impact onthe baking process while providing for an adequate delivery of modifiedwheat starch on ingestion of a typical daily intake of 100 to 200 grams.Alternatively the flour incorporated into the bread may be derivedsolely from the modified wheat.

The food or beverage or pharmaceutical preparation may be packaged readyfor sale or in bulk form.

The invention also provides methods of preparing the food, beverage orpharmaceutical preparation of the invention, and recipes or instructionsfor preparing such foods or beverages. The methods or recipes orinstructions may include the step of mixing altered wheat starch derivedfrom the grain of a wheat plant with another ingredient, wherein theportion of the amylose in the starch of the grain is at least 30%. Themethods or recipes or instructions may include the step of heating orbaking the altered starch ingredient or the product to at least 60° C.for at least ten minutes one or more times, or preferably to at least100° C., at least 120° C., at least 140° C., at least 180° C., at least200° C. or at least 220° C., before or after the mixing step. The methodmay include the step of packaging the product so that it is ready forsale.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1. Sequence of the Starch Branching Enzyme IIa gene (wSBE II-D1)[SEQ ID No. 1] from A. tauschii, corresponding to the D genome SBEIIagene of hexaploid wheat (T. aestivum).

FIG. 2. Partial wheat SBEIIb gene sequence (wbe2b genomic) [SEQ ID No.2] from T. aestivum.

FIG. 3. Schematic of duplex-RNA constructs. A. The order of the geneelements used were promoter, SBEIIa or SBEIIb gene sequence (exons 1, 2and 3) in sense orientation, intron (intron 3), SBEIIa or SBEIIb genesequence (exons 1, 2, 3 and 4) in antisense orientation, andtranscription terminator/polyadenylation sequence. B. The transcript ofthe ds-SBEIIa and ds-SBEIIb genes forms a “hairpin” RNA structure with adouble-stranded region formed by hybridization between the sense andantisense sequences. The intron sequence bordered by the GT and AGnucleotides is spliced out.

FIG. 4. Water absorption parameters for blends of high amylose flourfrom transgenic (T) and control (C) varieties, mixed in the ratios0:100, 10:90, 20:80, 30:70, 50:50, 75:25, 100:0, as measured by MicroZ-arm mixing. Transgenic varieties used were 50.3x/6/(60.1% amylose) and85.2c (81% amylose).

FIG. 5. Specific volume for admixtures of high amylose and controlflours, mixed in ratios as indicated.

FIG. 6. Mixing time of doughs made from mixtures of high amylose (T) andcontrol (C) wheat flour as determined by Mixograph mixing.

FIG. 7. In vitro Glycemic Index (GI) and Resistant Starch (RS) data forbreads made from high amylose (50.3x/6/and 85.2c) modified wheats, ordoubled-haploid progeny of a cross between varieties Sunco and an SGP-1triple null mutant. The progeny were tested for the presence of mutantSGP-1 alleles: lower case letters a, b and d represent the presence ofthe mutant alleles for SGP-1 on the A, B and D genomes of wheat,respectively. Therefore “abd” represents the triple null allele.“Wonderwhite” represents white bread made with added high amylose maizestarch (approximately 10%). Samples to the right of the vertical arrowshowed substantially lower GI values (less than 50).

FIG. 8. In vitro GI and RS data for breads made with blended highamylose flour: control flour.

FIG. 9. Nucleotide sequence of a cDNA encoding wheat SBEIIb [SEQ ID NO.3].

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The invention is based on the finding that the production of modifiedwheat and its incorporation into the diet of animals, particularlymammals, results in the improvement of bowel health as measured byseveral indicators. Furthermore, food products made with the modifiedwheat showed attributes such as increased levels of resistant starch(RS) and lower glycemic index (GI) and therefore consumption of the foodproducts also provides improved metabolic health. The wheat plant ismodified in starch biosynthesis, in particular to elevate the proportionof amylose in the starch of the grain.

A wheat plant is defined herein as any plant of a species of the genusTriticum, which species is commercially cultivated, including, forexample, Triticum aestivum L. ssp. aestivum (common or bread wheat),other subspecies of Triticum aestivum, Triticum turgidum L. ssp. durum(durum wheat, also known as macaroni or hard wheat), Triticum monococcumL. ssp. monococcum (cultivated einkorn or small spelt), Triticumtimopheevi ssp. timopheevi, Triticum turgigum L. ssp. dicoccon(cultivated emmer), and other subspecies of Triticum turgidum (Feldman).The wheat may be hexaploid wheat having an AABBDD type genome, ortetraploid wheat having an AABB type genome. Since genetic variation inwheat according to the invention can be transferred to certain relatedspecies including rye and barley by hybridization, the invention alsoincludes use of the hybrid species thus formed, including triticale thatis a hybrid between bread wheat and rye. In a particular embodiment, thewheat plant is of the species Triticum aestivum, and preferably of thesubspecies aestivum. Alternatively, since mutations or transgenes can bereadily transferred from Triticum aestivum to durum wheat, in anotherembodiment the wheat is Triticum turgidum L. ssp. durum.

The wheat plant is modified according to the invention so that itproduces altered starch in its grain. “Starch” is defined herein aspolysaccharide made up essentially of α-glucopyranose units. Starch isthe major storage carbohydrate in wheat, is synthesized in theamyloplasts and formed and stored in granules in the developing grain.It includes amylose, an essentially linear (<0.1% branchpoints)α-1,4-D-glucopyranose polymer and amylopectin, which has short chains ofα-D-glucopyranose units primarily linked by α-1,4 bonds with α-1,6linked branches. Wheat starch from wild-type plants comprises up toabout 20%-30% of amylose and about 70%-80% of amylopectin. A furthersignificant difference between amylose and amylopectin is in themolecular weight of the polymers. Amylose has a helical conformationwith a molecular weight of 10⁴-10⁶ daltons while amylopectin has amolecular weight of about 10⁷ to 10⁸ daltons. Recent studies have shownthat up to about 0.1% of α-1,6-glycosidic branching sites may occur inamylose, therefore it is described as “essentially linear”. “Amylose” isdefined herein as including essentially linear molecules of α-1,4 linkedglucosidic (glucopyranose) units and amylose-like long-chain amylopectin(sometimes referred to as “intermediate material” or “amylose-likeamylopectin”, Takeda et al., 1993b; Fergason, 1994). The proportion ofamylose in the starch as defined herein is on a weight/weight (w/w)basis, i.e. the weight of amylose as a percentage of the weight of totalstarch from the grain. Amylose content may be determined by any of themethods known in the art including size exclusion HPLC, for example in90% (w/v) DMSO, concanavalin A methods (Megazyme Int, Ireland), orpreferably by iodometric methods, for example as described in Example 1.The HPLC method may involve debranching of the starch (Batey and Curtin,1996) or not involve debranching. From the grain weight and amylosecontent, the amount of amylose deposited per grain can be calculated andcompared for modified and control lines.

The modification of the wheat plant according to the invention includesone or more alterations in the activity or amount of starch biosyntheticenzymes in the endosperm. “Endosperm” as used herein has the normalmeaning known in the art, being the tissue that is the primary site ofstarch synthesis and deposition in the developing grain, and the primaryproduct of milling of mature grain to remove the aleurone and germ. Inone embodiment, the alteration comprises a reduction in the amountand/or activity of starch branching enzyme IIa (SBEIIa) in the wheatendosperm, which results in an increased proportion of amylose in thestarch of the mature wheat grain. In another embodiment, themodification comprises reduction in SBEIIb as well as SBEIIa activity.Mutation in the genes encoding these two activities in wheat is aided bythe surprising finding that SBEIIa and SBEIIb are closely linked inwheat, in contrast to non-linkage in maize and rice. In a furtherembodiment, the modification comprises reduction in all three of SBEIIa,SBEIIb and SBEI. Other starch biosynthesis enzymes that may be alteredin combination with any of the above include starch synthase I (SSI),starch synthase II (SSII), starch synthase III (SSIII), phosphorylase orstarch debranching enzymes such as isoamylase or pullulanase. Thealterations may be, for example, increased activity, decreased activity,altered localization or timing of activity. When alterations in some ofthese enzymes are combined, characteristics of the starch other than therelative amylose content may also be altered. In an embodiment, themodified wheat comprises alterations in the activity of multiple starchbiosynthesis enzymes in wheat endosperm, preferably including areduction in the activity of SBEIIa such that the proportion of amylosein the starch of the grain is increased. In a further embodiment, theactivity of one or more starch biosynthesis enzymes is altered in theplant in tissues other than endosperm, for example the activity of SBEIor SBEII may be increased in leaves to compensate for some loss ofactivity caused by a transgene encoding an SBEIIa-inhibitory moleculeintended primarily for expression in the endosperm. The alteration in anenzyme activity may be an increase or reduction in amount or analteration in the timing of expression. Starch synthesis may be furtherimproved by the overexpression of one or more starch biosyntheticenzymes in combination with a reduction in SBEIIa. Genes encoding suchenzymes may be from any of a variety of sources, for example frombacterial or other sources other than wheat, and may be modified toalter the catalytic properties, for example alteration of thetemperature dependence of the enzymes (for example, see WO94/09144).

The high amylose phenotype may be achieved by partial or full inhibitionof the expression of the SBEIIa gene, or the SBEIIa and SBEIIb genes. A“high amylose” phenotype or “high amylose level in the starch of thegrain” or the like as used herein refers to total starch obtained fromthe grain having at least 30% amylose. The extent to which the gene orgenes are inhibited will in some degree determine the characteristics ofthe starch made in the wheat grain. Any of a range of gelelectrophoresis techniques carried out on the proteins extracted fromthe modified wheat endosperm will reveal the nature and extent ofmodification to the SBEIIa and/or SBEIIb activity. Modification mayoccur as a reduction in SBEIIa and/or SBEIIb activity, completeabolition of enzyme activity, or an alteration in the distribution ofthe SBEIIa, SBEIIb or other enzymes within the endosperm. For example,SBEIIa, SBEIIb or other activity may be reduced by affecting thedistribution of the enzymes within the endosperm, such as reducing thelevel of enzyme that is starch granule-bound. Such a pattern has beenobserved for SBEIIa in maize that is mutant at the dull1 locus. To carryout these tests, starch may be extracted from the wheat endosperm andthe proteins therein analyzed, for example as outlined in Rahman et al,1995. Techniques well known in the art such as SDS-PAGE andimmunoblotting are carried out on the soluble and the starch granulefractions and the results used to identify the plants or grain wheremodifications have occurred to the SBEIIa, SBEIIb or other enzymes.

Alteration of the starch biosynthesis enzyme activities may be achievedby the introduction of one or more genetic variations into the wheatplant. That is, the genetic variations lead, directly or indirectly, tothe alteration in enzyme activity in the endosperm during graindevelopment and consequently to the starch modifications describedherein. A reduction in the level of SBEIIa or other enzyme activity maybe accomplished by a reduction in the expression of one or more genesencoding the enzymes, which may be achieved by mutation, a combinationof mutations, or the introduction of one or more nucleic acids, forexample a transgene which encodes an inhibitory molecule. Examples ofinhibitory molecules include antisense, co-suppression, ribozyme orduplex RNA molecules.

As used herein, the terms “altering”, “increasing”, “increased”,“reducing”, “reduced”, “inhibited” or the like are considered relativeterms, i.e. in comparison with the wild-type or unaltered state. The“level of a protein” refers to the amount of a particular protein, forexample SBEIIa, which may be measured by any means known in the art suchas, for example, Western blot analysis or other immunological means. The“level of an enzyme activity” refers to the amount of a particularenzyme measured in an enzyme assay. It would be appreciated that thelevel of activity of an enzyme might be altered in a mutant if a more orless active protein is produced, but not the expression level (amount)of the protein itself. Conversely, the amount of protein might bealtered but the activity (per unit protein) remain the same. Reductionsin both amount and activity are also possible such as, for example, whenthe expression of a gene encoding the enzyme is reducedtranscriptionally or post-transcriptionally. In certain embodiments, thereduction in the level of protein or activity is by at least 40% or byat least 60% compared to the level of protein or activity in theendosperm of unmodified wheat, or by at least 75%, at least 90% or atleast 95%. The reduction in the level of the protein or enzyme activityor gene expression may occur at any stage in the development of thegrain, particularly during the grain filling stage while starch is beingsynthesized in the developing endosperm, or at all stages of graindevelopment through to maturity. In a further embodiment, the level ofSBEIIa or other enzyme is reduced in the endosperm by at least 50%compared to the wild-type. The term “wild-type” as used herein has itsnormal meaning in the field of genetics and includes wheat cultivars orgenotypes which are not modified as taught herein.

The amount or the activity of enzymes such as SBEIIa in wheat endospermmay be measured using any method known in the art such as, for example,by immunodetection methods, Western blotting or ELISA assays, or thelevel of its corresponding mRNA may measured by methods such as Northernblot hybridization analysis or reverse transcription polymerase chainreaction (RT-PCR). A wheat plant or grain having an altered level of aparticular protein or enzyme activity in its endosperm may be screenedor selected based on a reduced level of the protein or enzyme (directassay), or it may be based on the phenotype of the grain of the wheatplant such as an increased proportion of amylose or decreased proportionof amylopectin, or a visual phenotype, for example shrunken grain oraltered starch granule properties. The wheat plant with the alteredstarch properties as used herein may be identified using any of themethods known in the art, either directly determining the starchproperties or indirectly, for example, detecting the presence of agenetic variation in the plant or its grain. The plant may be a plant ina population of wheat plants, such as, for example, in wheat breeding.

The “wheat SBEIIa gene” or the like as used herein refers to anucleotide sequence encoding starch branching enzyme IIa in wheat, whichcan readily be distinguished from SBEIIb or other proteins by thoseskilled in the art. This includes the naturally occurring variants ofthe genes existing in wheat, including those encoded by the A, B and Dgenomes of breadwheat, as well as non-naturally occurring variants whichmay be produced by those skilled in the art of gene modification.Examples are shown in Table 1. In a preferred embodiment, a wheat SBEIIagene refers to a nucleic acid molecule, which may be present in orisolated from wheat or derived therefrom, comprising nucleotides havinga sequence having at least 80% identity to the coding region of thewSBEIIa-D1 gene shown in SEQ ID NO: 1. In analogous fashion, a “wheatSBEIIb gene” as used herein refers to a nucleotide sequence encodingstarch branching enzyme IIb in wheat. A partial wheat SBEIIb genesequence (wbe2b genomic) from T. aestiuum is shown in FIG. 2 (SEQ ID NO:2). A wheat SBEIIb cDNA sequence is shown in FIG. 9.

In analogous fashion, the “wheat SSIIa gene” or the like as used hereinrefers to a nucleotide sequence encoding starch synthase IIa in wheat,which can readily be distinguished from other starch synthases or otherproteins by those skilled in the art. This includes the naturallyoccurring variants of the genes existing in wheat, including thoseencoded by the A, B and D genomes of breadwheat, as well asnon-naturally occurring variants which may be produced by those skilledin the art of gene modification. Examples are reported in WO00/66745. Ina preferred embodiment, a wheat SSIIa gene refers to a nucleic acidmolecule, which may be present in or isolated from wheat or derivedtherefrom, comprising nucleotides having a sequence having at least 80%identity to the coding region of the wSSIIa gene shown in WO00/66745.

SBE activity may be measured directly by enzyme assay, for example bythe phosphorylase stimulation assay (Boyer and Preiss, 1978). This assaymeasures the stimulation by SBE of the incorporation of glucose1-phosphate into methanol-insoluble polymer (α-D-glucan) byphosphorylase a. SBE activity can be measured by the iodine stain assay,which measures the decrease in the absorbance of a glucan-polyiodinecomplex resulting from branching of glucan polymers. SBE activity canalso be assayed by the branch linkage assay which measures thegeneration of reducing ends from reduced amylose as substrate, followingisoamylase digestion (Takeda et al., 1993a). Preferably, the activity ismeasured in the absence of SBEI or SBEIIb activity. Isoforms of SBE showdifferent substrate specificities, for example SBEI exhibits higheractivity in branching amylose, while SBEIIa and SBEIIb show higher ratesof branching with an amylopectin substrate. The isoforms may also bedistinguished on the basis of the length of the glucan chain that istransferred. SBE protein may also be measured by using specificantibodies such as those described herein. The SBEII activity may bemeasured during grain development in the developing endosperm, oralternatively in the mature grain where the protein is still present inequivalent, but unaltered, grain and can be assayed by immunologicalmethods. Starch synthase activity may be measured by extraction ofproteins from endosperm and assay as described in Example 1.

In one embodiment the modified wheat having altered starch has anincreased proportion of amylose in the grain starch to at least 30%.Ordinarily in hexaploid and durum wheats, the proportion of amylose instarch is in the range from about 18 to about 30% (w/w). In thisembodiment, the modified wheat comprises one or more genetic variationswhich result in the starch in its grain comprising at least 30% amylose.The proportion of amylose in the starch as defined herein is on aweight/weight (w/w) basis, i.e. the weight of amylose as a percentage ofthe weight of total starch from the grain. In further embodiments, theproportion of amylose in the starch is at least 40%, at least 45%, atleast 50%, at least 55%, at least 60%, at least 65%, at least 70% or atleast 75% (each w/w). In further embodiments of the invention, themethod provides for a proportion of amylase of at least 80% or at least90% (w/w).

The wheat plants described herein for use in the invention includeprogeny plants which have the desired characteristics of the parentalwheat plants, in genotype and/or phenotype, into which the modificationswere introduced. The wheat plants also encompass the geneticvariations(s) or mutations in other genetic backgrounds or other specieswhich can be hybridised with the wheat plant as described above. Themodified parental plants may be crossed with plants containing a moredesirable genetic background. After the initial crossing, a suitablenumber of backcrosses may be carried out to remove the less desirablebackground. The desired genetic background may include a suitablecombination of genes providing commercial yield and othercharacteristics such as agronomic performance or abiotic stressresistance. The genetic background might also include other alteredstarch biosynthesis or modification genes, for example genes from otherwheat lines that have a shrunken endosperm where the causal gene is notknown. The desired genetic background of the wheat may includeconsiderations of agronomic yield and other characteristics. Suchcharacteristics might include whether it is desired to have a winter orspring type of wheat, agronomic performance, disease resistance andabiotic stress resistance. In Australia one might want to cross thealtered starch trait into wheat cultivars such as Baxter, Kennedy, Janz,Frame, Rosella, Cadoux, Diamondbird or other commonly grown varieties.The examples provided are specific for an Australian production region,and other varieties will be suited for other growing regions. It ispreferred that the wheat variety of the invention provide a yield notless than 80% of the corresponding wild-type variety in at least somegrowing regions, more preferably not less than 90% and even morepreferably not less than 95%. The yield can readily be measured incontrolled field trials.

In an embodiment, the modified wheat plant comprises a mutation whereinthe SBEIIa gene is absent from the long arm of chromosome 2A (2AL) orwherein the SBEIIa gene on the long arm of chromosome 2A comprises amutation which leads to reduced level of SBEIIa enzyme activity in theendosperm of said grain relative to wild-type grain. Despite anextensive screen of 2400 wheat accessions, the inventors did not findsuch plants that were naturally occurring, suggesting that selection forretention of the functional SBEIIa gene on 2AL might be happening innature. However, such plants could be produced and identified aftermutagenesis. These plants are non-transgenic which is desirable in somemarkets. These plants may be bread wheat, durum wheat or other wheat. Ina preferred embodiment, the wheat plant comprises a deletion of at leastpart of the SBEIIa gene, which may extend to at least part of the SBEIIbgene, on the 2AL chromosome. As is understood in the art, hexaploidwheats such as bread wheat comprise three genomes which are commonlydesignated the A, B and D genomes, while tetrapolid wheats such as durumwheat comprise two genomes commonly designated the A and B genomes. Eachgenome comprises 7 pairs of chromosomes which may be observed bycytological methods during meiosis and thus identified, as is well knownin the art. Each chromosome has a centromere, which on chromosome 2 ispositioned asymmetrically; therefore the two arms of chromosome 2 aredesignated “short” and “long”. The “long arm of chromosome 2A” isdefined herein as the region of that chromosome 2A between thecentromere and tip along the long arm, in accord with the standardmeaning of the term. The terms “long arm of chromosome 2B” and the “longarm of chromosome 2D” are defined in the same way except that theyrelate to chromosome 2 of the B or D genomes of wheat, respectively.

We have found that the SBEIIa and SBEIIb genes are both present onchromosome 2 in wheat. In a particular embodiment, the wheat plantcomprises the majority (>50%) of 2AL, which chromosome arm comprises amutation of at least the SBEIIa gene. That is, chromosome 2AL isessentially present, comprising a mutation in at least the SBEIIa geneof the A genome. The presence of 2AL may be determined by cytologicaltechniques such as, for example, in situ hybridization techniques or byusing 2AL specific molecular markers. In a preferred embodiment, thewheat plant is homozygous for said mutation. The mutation may be a nullmutation. The mutation may be a deletion.

The modified wheat plants may be transgenic or non-transgenic. Theinvention also extends to the grain produced from the wheat plants andany propagating material of the wheat plants that can be used to producethe plants with the desired characteristics, such as cultured tissue orcells. The invention clearly extends to methods of producing oridentifying such wheat plants or the grain produced by such plants.

The modified wheat plants as described herein, particularly the grainobtained from the plants or products containing the altered wheat starchobtained from the grain may be used in the production of a food,beverage or pharmaceutical preparation which is intended for consumptionby, or administration to, an animal, preferably a mammal and inparticular a human. The food, beverage or pharmaceutical preparationcomprises the modified wheat grain or a product derived therefromcomprising the altered starch.

Modified Grain

The invention also provides foods, beverages or pharmaceuticalpreparations produced with modified wheat grain or altered starchobtained therefrom, obtained from wheat plants as described herein.Grain is defined herein as essentially mature grain. This includes grainas harvested in a commercial setting. In one embodiment, the alteredstarch is at least partly a consequence of reduced SBEIIa activityduring development of the endosperm of the wheat grain. The grain maycomprise an increased proportion of amylose as a percentage of totalstarch. This may be determined as a reduced proportion of amylopectin inthe starch compared to grain from a wild-type plant. Wild-type wheatstarch has approximately 18-30% amylose and 70-80% amylopectin. Thegrain for use in the invention comprises starch comprising at least 30%amylose, preferably comprising at least 50% (w/w) amylose. In a furtherembodiment, both SBEIIa and SBEIIb activities are reduced duringdevelopment of the endosperm. Increased amylose levels may be evidencedby abnormal starch granule morphology or loss of birefringence of thegranules when observed under a light microscope or other methods knownin the art. In a particular embodiment, the proportion of amylose in thestarch of the grain is measured by an iodometric method, which may be aspectrophotometric method such as, for example, the method of Morrisonand Laignelet (1983), or by high-performance liquid chromatography(HPLC, for example, Batey and Curtin, 1996).

The grain may be shrunken or non-shrunken, preferably having anon-shrunken phenotype. “Non-shrunken” as used herein is defined aswhere the majority of grains, preferably at least 90% of the individualgrains, show a plump or fully-filled phenotype. This is usuallyassociated with a normal or near normal level of starch accumulation. Incontrast, a “shrunken” phenotype as used herein refers to the majorityof grains, particularly at least 90% of the grains, having reducedstarch accumulation. Slightly shrunken grain refers to a reduction inaverage starch content of at least 30%, moderately shrunken grain refersto a reduction in average starch content of at least 50%, and highlyshrunken grain refers to a reduction in average starch content of atleast 70%, each relative to wild-type grain. Shrunkenness may also bemeasured by the relative starch content, as a percentage of mature grainweight. Unaltered field-grown wheat grain has a starch content of about65%, while in shrunken grain this is reduced to less than 50%.

In further embodiments, the grain has an average weight of at least 36mg or 40 mg. The average weight of the grain is determined by measuringthe weight of a known number of grains, being a representative sample ofthe batch of grain, and dividing the total weight by the number ofgrains. It would be appreciated that characteristics of the grain suchas starch content, average weight and a non-shrunken phenotype that arenear wild-type levels are desirable for commercial production of thegrain. In further embodiments, the starch content of the grain is atleast about 25%, 35%, 45%, or 55% to 65% (w/w). Wild-type wheat growncommercially usually has a starch content in the range 55-65%, dependingsomewhat on the cultivar grown. Alternatively, the grain of theinvention has a starch content of at least 90% that of grain from anequivalent, but unaltered, wheat. Lower starch contents than wild-typeare likely a consequence of reduced amylopectin levels. Even with lowerstarch contents, the grain may still be useful for commercial foodproduction because of the relatively high value of the high amyloseproducts. Other desirable characteristics include the capacity to millthe grain, in particular the grain hardness. Another aspect that mightmake a wheat plant of higher value is the degree of starch extractionfrom the grain, the higher extraction rates being more useful. Grainshape is also another feature that can impact on the commercialusefulness of a plant, thus grain shape can have an impact on the easeor otherwise with which the grain can be milled. For example, anelongated grain morphology may make it difficult to mill and process.

A fuller grain may be desirable in terms of achieving greater yields andcertain benefits of the invention might be achieved, such as theproduction of starch with high levels of amylose, or in the alternativestarch with altered chain length distributions. Thus the grainpreferably has a non-shrunken phenotype. Other aspects of the inventionmay, however, be better achieved by a grain that is less filled. Thusthe proportion of aleurone layer or germ or protein to starch may behigher in less filled grain, thereby providing for a wheat flour orother product that is higher in the beneficial constituents of thealeurone layer or protein. The high aleurone layer product might thus behigher in certain vitamins such as folate, or it might be higher incertain minerals such as calcium, and that combined with higherresistant starch levels might provide synergistic effects such asproviding for enhanced uptake of minerals in the large bowel.

The invention also provides for the use of flour, meal, dough or otherproducts produced from the grain or using the grain. These may beunprocessed or processed, for example by fractionation or bleaching. Theinvention further provides wheat grain useful for food productionobtained from the wheat plant of the invention. Additionally theinvention encompasses grain that has been processed in other ways, sothat the grain may have been milled, ground, rolled, pearled, kibbled orcracked, or par boiled (polenta), for example as cons cous.

Altered Starch

In another aspect, the invention provides foods, beverages orpharmaceutical preparations produced with altered wheat starch obtainedfrom the grain of the wheat plants as described herein, the starchhaving an increased proportion of amylose and a reduced proportion ofamylopectin. As used herein, the term “starch” generally refers to thetotal starch of the grain or the starch prior to any fractionation thatalters the ratio of amylose to amylopectin. The starch may be at leastpartly purified, i.e. it has been separated from at least one othercomponent of the grain. As used herein, “substantially purified starch”means that at least 95% (w/w) of the dry weight of the composition isstarch. Purified starch may be obtained from grain by a milling process,for example a wet milling process, which involves the separation of thestarch from protein, oil and fibre. The initial product of the millingprocess is a mixture or composition of starch granules, and theinvention therefore encompasses such granules, comprising the modifiedstarch as described herein.

In further embodiments, the altered starch has altered physicalcharacteristics such as, for example, an increased or reducedgelatinisation temperature, altered swelling characteristics during orfollowing gelatinisation, altered viscosity, an altered chain lengthdistribution in the amylopectin, or any combination of these.Gelatinisation is the heat-driven collapse (disruption) of molecularorder within the starch granule in excess water, with concomitant andirreversible changes in properties such as granular swelling,crystallite melting, loss of birefringence, viscosity development andstarch solubilisation. High amylose starch from ae (amylose extender)mutants of maize showed a higher gelatinisation temperature than normalmaize (Fuwa et al., 1999, Krueger et al., 1987). On the other hand,starch from barley sex6 mutants that lack starch synthase IIa activityhad lower gelatinisation temperatures and the enthalpy for thegelatinisation peak was reduced when compared to that from controlplants (Morell et al., 2003). The gelatinisation temperature ofwild-type wheat starch is typically about 61° C. (Rahman et al, 2000)for the temperature of the first peak, defined as the onset temperature,as measured by differential scanning calorimetry. The increased orreduced gelatinisation temperature may be for the first peak ofgelatinisation, the second peak, or both. One or more properties of thestarch such as, for example, the enthalpy of gelatinisation, may beunaltered. The starch may have an increased or reduced gelatinisationtemperature, preferably an increased gelatinisation temperature. Forexample, we have observed that the starch obtained from SBEIIa-reducedwheat has an increased gelatinization temperature, while that forSSIIa-reduced wheat has a reduced gelatinization temperature. Thetemperature of the first peak (apex) of gelatinisation as measured bydifferential scanning calorimetry may be increased or decreased by atleast 3° C. or 5° C., preferably by at least 7° C. or 8° C. and morepreferably by at least 10° C. compared to the temperature of the firstpeak for the corresponding starch from wild-type grain. In a particularembodiment, the increase or decrease is in the range of 3° C. to 12° C.Of particular note, the gelatinisation temperature may have a decreasedtemperature of onset of the first peak combined with an increasedtemperature of the peak apex. In another embodiment which is notmutually exclusive with the previous, the starch has an alteredgelatinisation temperature for the first peak but exhibits asubstantially unaltered temperature for the second peak, whichcorresponds to amylose-lipid dissociation, as determined by DSC. In afurther embodiment, the starch exhibits a decreased enthalpy duringgelatinisation, such as, for example, a decrease by at least 25% or atleast 40% compared to that of corresponding wild-type wheat starch.

The starch may also be characterized by its swelling rate in heatedexcess water compared to wild-type starch. Swelling volume is typicallymeasured by mixing either a starch or flour with excess water andheating to elevated temperatures, typically greater than 90° C. Thesample is then collected by centrifugation and the swelling volume isexpressed as the mass of the sedimented material divided by the dryweight of the sample. A low swelling characteristic is useful where itis desired to increase the starch content of a food preparation, inparticular a hydrated food preparation.

The starch structure of the wheat of selected forms of the presentinvention may also differ in that the degree of crystallinity is reducedcompared to normal starch isolated from wheat. The reduced crystallinityof a starch is also thought to be associated with enhanced organolepticproperties and contributes to a smoother mouth feel. Thus the starch mayadditionally exhibit reduced crystallinity resulting from reduced levelsof activity of one or more amylopectin synthesis enzymes. Crystallinityis typically investigated by X-ray crystallography.

One measure of an altered amylopectin structure is the distribution ofchain lengths, or the degree of polymerization, of the starch. The chainlength distribution may be determined by using fluorophore-assistedcarbohydrate electrophoresis (FACE) following isoamylase de-branching.The amylopectin of the starch of the invention may have a distributionof chain length in the range from 5 to 60 that is greater than thedistribution of starch from wild-type plants upon debranching. Starchwith longer chain lengths will also have a commensurate decrease infrequency of branching. Thus the starch may also have a distribution oflonger amylopectin chain lengths in the amylopectin still present.

In another embodiment, the starch comprises an elevated level ofresistant starch, with an altered structure indicated by specificphysical characteristics. Such characteristics may include physicalinaccessibility to digestive enzymes which may be by reason of havingaltered starch granule morphology, the presence of appreciable starchassociated lipid, altered crystallinity, altered amylopectin chainlength distribution, or any combination of these. The high proportion ofamylose also contributes to the level of resistant starch.

The invention also provides starch from grain of the exemplified wheatplant comprising increased amounts of dietary fibre, preferably incombination with an elevated level of resistant starch. This increase isalso at least in part a result of the high relative level of amylose.

The invention clearly extends to methods of producing the wheat starchdescribed herein. In one embodiment, the method comprises the steps ofobtaining wheat grain as described herein and extracting the starch fromthe grain. The wheat grain may be obtained by growing the wheat plantsdescribed herein and harvesting the grain, or from a producer of thegrain or importer of the grain.

Foods, Beverages and Pharmaceutical Products

The invention also encompasses foods, beverages or pharmaceuticalpreparations produced with modified wheat or altered starch as describedherein, preferably obtained from wheat plants that have reduced SBEIIaactivity. In an embodiment, the wheat plant has an alteration,preferably a reduction, in at least one starch biosynthetic enzyme otherthan SBEIIa Plants having reduced SBEIIa and SBEIIb activities may beproduced by crossing a plant reduced for SBEIIa with a plant reduced forSBEIIb, or by introducing a transgene encoding a molecule that inhibitsexpression of both SBEIIa and SBEIIb genes. Because of the close linkageof the SBEIIa and SBEIIb genes in wheat as revealed herein, plantsreduced for both activities may also be produced by identifyingvarieties lacking the SBEIIa and SBEIIb isoforms encoded by one of thegenomes of wheat, and crossing such varieties to produce a plant reducedfor the isoforms encoded by at least two genomes. Such food productionmight include the making of flour, dough or other products that might bean ingredient in commercial food production.

Starch is the major source of carbohydrate in most human diets and thegrain of the invention and products derived from it can be used toprepare food. The foods may be consumed by humans or animals,particularly mammalian animals, for example during livestock productionor in pet-food. As used herein, “mammals” or “mammalian” refers to anymember of the Mammalia. The grain derived from the altered wheat plantcan be used readily in food processing procedures and therefore theinvention includes milled, ground, kibbled, pearled or rolled grain orproducts obtained from the processed or whole grain of the wheat plantreferred to above, including flour. These products may be then used invarious food products, for example farinaceous products such as breads,cakes, biscuits and the like or food additives such as thickeners orbinding agents or to make drinks, noodles, pasta or quick soups. Thegrain or products derived from the grain of the invention areparticularly desired in breakfast cereals or as extruded products. Thehigh amylose starches of the invention can also be used to form highstrength gels that are useful in the confectionery industry or allowlower molding and curing times. They may also be used as a coating, forexample to reduce oil absorption in deep-fried potato or other foods.

Dietary Fibre

Dietary fibre, in this specification, is the carbohydrate andcarbohydrate digestion products that are not absorbed in the smallintestine of healthy humans but enter the large bowel. This includesresistant starches, β-glucans and other soluble and insolublecarbohydrate polymers. It is thought to comprise that portion ofcarbohydrates that are fermentable, at least partially, in the largebowel by the resident microflora.

The starch of the invention preferably contains relatively high levelsof dietary fibre, more particularly amylose. The dietary fibre contentof the grain of the present invention may or may not result solely fromthe increased relative endospermal amylose content.

Aspects of this invention might also arise from the combination of thealeurone layer and germ in combination with high levels of dietaryfibre. Specifically, this may arise where higher relative levels ofaleurone or germ are present in the grain. Where the wheat grain isslightly shrunken the endosperm is present in reduced amounts and thealeurone layer and the germ are present in relatively elevated amounts.Thus the wheat has a relatively high level of certain beneficialelements or vitamins in combination with elevated resistant starch. Suchelements include divalent cations (including bioavailable Ca⁺⁺) andvitamins such as folate or antioxidants such as tocopherols ortocotrienols. One specific form of milled product might be one where thealeurone layer is included in the milled product. Particular millingprocess might be undertaken to enhance the amount of aleurone layer inthe milled product. Thus, any product derived from grain milled orotherwise processed to include aleurone layer and germ will have theadditional nutritional benefits, without the requirement of adding theseelements from separate sources.

Resistant Starch

Resistant starch is defined as the sum of starch and products of starchdigestion not absorbed in the small intestine of healthy humans butentering into the large bowel. Thus, resistant starch excludes productsdigested and absorbed in the small intestine. Resistant starches includephysically inaccessible starch (RS1 form), resistant granules (RS2),retrograded starches (RS3) and chemically modified starches (RS4). Thealtered starch structure and in particular the high amylose levels ofthe starch of the invention give rise to an increase in resistant starchwhen consumed in food. The starch may be in an RS1 form, being somewhatinaccessible to digestion. Starch-lipid association, as measured byV-complex crystallinity, is also likely to contribute to the level ofresistant starch. The level of resistant starch present in a food orother products is preferably measured in rum as described in Example 13,or in viva as described in Example 16.

It will be understood that one benefit of the present invention is thatit provides for products that are of particular nutritional benefit and,moreover, it does so without the need to modify the starch or otherconstituents of the wheat grain. However it may be desired to makemodifications to the starch or other constituent of the grain, and theinvention encompasses such a modified constituent. Methods ofmodification are well known and include the extraction of the starch orother constituent by conventional methods and modification of thestarches to increase the resistant form. The starch may be modified bytreatment with heat and/or moisture, physically (for example ballmilling), enzymatically (using for example α- or β-amylase, pullalanaseor the like), chemical hydrolysis (wet or dry using liquid or gaseousreagents), oxidation, cross bonding with difunctional reagents (forexample sodium trimetaphosphate, phosphorous oxychloride),esterification or carboxymethylation.

Glycemic Index

Glycaemic Index (GI) relates to the rate of digestion of foodscomprising the starch, and is a comparison of the effect of a test foodwith the effect of white bread or glucose on excursions in blood glucoseconcentration. The Glycaemic Index is a measure of the likely effect ofthe food concerned on post-prandial serum glucose concentration anddemand for insulin for blood glucose homeostasis. One importantcharacteristic provided by foods of the invention is a reduced glycaemicindex. Furthermore, the foods may have a low level of final digestionand consequently be relatively low-kilojoule, or may be described as lowenergy-density foods. A low calorific product might be based oninclusion of flour produced from milled wheat grain. Such foods may havethe effect of being filling, enhancing bowel health, reducing thepost-prandial serum glucose and lipid concentration as well as providingfor a low metaholisable energy food product.

Bread

In bread the altered wheat starch in the form of flour or wholemeal maysubstitute for 10% (w/w) or more of unaltered flour or wholemeal,preferably substituting at least 30% and even more preferably at least50% of the unaltered flour or wholemeal. The formulation might thereforebe, for example, flour 90 parts, altered wheat starch 10 parts, fat 2parts, salt 2 parts, improver 1 part, yeast 2.5 parts. The production ofthe bread may be by a rapid dough technique or other techniques as isknown by those skilled in the art.

Pasta Product

The altered wheat starch may be incorporated into a farinaceous basedpasta product. The amount of altered wheat starch employed in the pastacomposition may be in the range of 10-40% (w/w) or more based on thetotal weight of farinaceous material more particularly in the range of15 to 35%. Suitable other farinaceous materials will readily be chosenby a person skilled in the art.

Other material may also be added to the composition for example dry orliquid eggs (yolks, whites, or both) or high protein substances such asmilk protein or fish protein. Vitamins, minerals, calcium salts, aminoacids, buffering agents such as disodium hydrogen phosphate, seasoning,gum, gluten or glyceryl monostearate may also be added.

In the preparation of pasta, the ingredients may first be dry blendeduntil they are uniformly dispersed. Water is then added to the dry blendwith continued mixing until a dough is obtained with is plastic enoughto be sheeted or extruded but firm enough to cohere. The pasteformulation will normally contain about 75 parts of dry farinaceousmaterial and about 25 parts of water. These proportions will varydepending on such factors as the variety of flour employed, glutenquality, protein content, initial flour moisture and flour particlesize. The pasta may be shaped and then dried using methods known in theart preferably with the starch component in an ungelatinised form.

Pharmaceutical Product

Compositions for oral delivery may be in the form of tablets, lozenges,aqueous or oily suspensions, granules, powders, emulsions, capsules,caplets, gelcaps, syrups or elixirs, for example. Orally administeredcompositions may contain one or more optional agents, for example,sweetening agents such as fructose, aspartame or saccharin; flavoringagents such as peppermint, oil of wintergreen, or cherry; coloringagents; and preserving agents, to provide a pharmaceutically palatablepreparation. Moreover, where in tablet or pill form, the compositionsmay be coated to delay disintegration and absorption in thegastrointestinal tract thereby providing a sustained action over anextended period of time. Selectively permeable membranes surrounding anosmotically active driving compound are also suitable for orallyadministered compounds of the invention. In these later platforms, fluidfrom the environment surrounding the capsule is imbibed by the drivingcompound, which swells to displace the agent or agent compositionthrough an aperture. These delivery platforms can provide an essentiallyzero order delivery profile as opposed to the spiked profiles ofimmediate release formulations. A time delay material such as glycerolmonostearate or glycerol stearate may also be used. Oral compositionscan include standard vehicles such as mannitol, lactose, starch,magnesium stearate, sodium saccharine, cellulose, magnesium carbonate,etc. Such vehicles are preferably of pharmaceutical grade.

Methods of Reducing Gene Activity

The expression and/or activity of SBEIIa, SBEIIb or other starchbiosynthesis or modification genes may be altered by introducing one ormore genetic variations into the wheat plant. As used herein, a “geneticvariation” means any heritable alteration in the genome of the wheatplant which, in this context, affects the expression or activity of thegene of interest. Genetic variations include mutations such as pointmutations, insertions, substitutions, inversions, duplications,translocations and preferably deletions, and the introduction of one ormore transgenes into the genome.

The phrases “nucleic acid molecule” and “nucleic acid sequence” as usedherein refer to a polymer of nucleotides, which may be single-strandedor double-stranded. It may comprise DNA such as, for example, genomicDNA or cDNA, or RNA, mRNA or any combinations of these. For introductioninto wheat cells, a nucleic acid molecule may be chemically modified forimproved delivery or stability, or protected as part of a vector such asa viral vector. The nucleic acid molecule may be obtained by cloningtechniques or synthesized by techniques well known in the art. Thenucleic acid molecule may comprise a coding strand or non-coding strand(antisense) or a combination of these such as, for example, in invertedrepeat constructs. In reference to nucleic acid sequences which“correspond” to a gene, the term “correspond” refers to a nucleotidesequence relationship, such that the nucleotide sequence has anucleotide sequence which is the same as the reference gene or anindicated portion thereof, or has a nucleotide sequence which is exactlycomplementary in normal Watson-Crick base pairing, or is an RNAequivalent of such a sequence, for example, an mRNA, or is a cDNAderived from an mRNA of the gene.

Nucleotide sequences are presented herein by a single strand sequence inthe 5′ to 3′ direction, using the standard one letter nucleotideabbreviations. “Complementary” describes the relationship between twosingle-stranded nucleic acid molecules or sequences that anneal bybase-pairing. For example, 5′-GACT-3′ pairs with its complement,5′-AGTC-3′. “Homology” or “homologous” refers to sequence similarity oridentity between two or more nucleotide sequences or two or morepolypeptide sequences, according to the context. The term “percentidentity” as applied to nucleotide sequences refers to the percentage ofnucleotide matches between two nucleotide sequences aligned using astandardized algorithm such as, for example, the CLUSTAL V algorithm orthe Blastn or BLAST 2 Sequences programs available from the NationalCenter for Biotechnology Information, available on the Internet athttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/, and preferably set at defaultparameters. In similar fashion, “percent identity” may refer topolypeptide sequences.

Reference herein to a “gene” including an SBEIIa, SSIIa, SBEIIb or otherstarch biosynthetic gene, or genes encoding antisense, co-suppression,ribozyme, duplex RNA molecules or the like, is to be taken in itsbroadest context and includes a classical genomic gene having atranscribed region associated with regulatory regions such as promotersand transcription terminators-polyadenylation sequences. The transcribedregion includes transcribed but not translated sequences (untranslatedsequences, UTR) and optionally may include a protein coding region orintrons, which are spliced out to form a mature RNA, or any combinationof these. A “gene” includes forms obtained from cDNA, corresponding tothe exons, and RNA genes such as those found on RNA genomes. The term“gene” is also used to describe synthetic or fusion molecules encodingall or part of a functional product.

When present in a cell, preferably a wheat cell, a “gene” directs the“expression” of a “biologically active” molecule or “gene product”,which may be RNA or a polypeptide. This process is most commonly bytranscription to produce RNA and translation to produce protein. Such aproduct may be subsequently modified in the cell. RNA may be modifiedby, for example, polyadenylation, splicing, capping, dicing into 21-23nucleotide fragments, or export from the nucleus or by covalent ornoncovalent interactions with proteins. Proteins may be modified by, forexample, phosphorylation, glycosylation or lipidation. All of theseprocesses are encompassed by the term “expression of a gene” or the likeas used herein.

As used herein, the terms “wheat SBEIIa gene” and “wheat SBEIIb gene”and related terms refer to the genes that have been identified fromwheat that encode SBEIIa or SBEIIb enzymes, respectively, and homologousgenes present in other wheat varieties. These include, but are notlimited to, the gene sequences listed in Table 1. It would be understoodthat there is natural variation in the sequences of SBEIIa and SBEIIbgenes from different wheat varieties. The homologous genes are readilyrecognizable by the skilled artisan. The degree of sequence identitybetween homologous SBEIIa genes or the proteins is thought to be atleast 80%, similarly for SBEIIb genes or proteins. Analogous definitionsapply to “wheat SSIIa gene” and the like.

The genes for use in the invention may be derived from a naturallyoccurring SBEIIa, SBEIIb or other starch biosynthetic gene by standardrecombinant techniques. A “recombinant nucleic acid molecule” or liketerm as used herein refers to a sequence that is not naturally occurringor has a sequence that is made by an artificial combination of two ormore otherwise separated segments of sequence. This artificialcombination may be formed by chemical synthesis or, more commonly, bythe artificial manipulation of isolated segments of nucleic acids, forexample by genetic engineering techniques well known in the art. Theterm “recombinant” includes nucleic acids that have been altered solelyby addition, substitution, or deletion of a portion of the nucleic acid.Frequently, a recombinant nucleic acid may include a nucleic acidsequence operably linked to a promoter sequence. Such a recombinantnucleic acid may be part of a vector that is used, for example, totransform a cell.

Generally, a gene may be subjected to mutagenesis to produce single ormultiple nucleotide substitutions, deletions and/or additions such as,for example, codon modification. Nucleotide insertional derivatives ofsuch genes include 5′ and 3′ terminal fusions as well as intra-sequenceinsertions of single or multiple nucleotides. Insertional nucleotidesequence variants are those in which one or more nucleotides areintroduced into a predetermined site in the nucleotide sequence,although random insertion is also possible with suitable screening ofthe resulting product. Deletional variants are characterised by theremoval of one or more nucleotides from the sequence. Substitutionalnucleotide variants are those in which at least one nucleotide in thesequence has been removed and a different nucleotide inserted in itsplace. Such a substitution may be “silent” in that the substitution doesnot change the amino acid defined by the codon. Alternatively,conservative substituents are designed to alter one amino acid foranother similar acting amino acid. Typical substitutions are those madein accordance with the following:

Suitable residues for conservative amino acid substitutions OriginalExemplary Residue Substitutions Ala Ser Arg Lys Asn Gln; His Asp Glu CysSer Gln Asn Glu Asp Gly Ala His Asn; Gln Ile Leu; Val Leu Ile; Val LysArg; Gln; Glu Met Leu; Ile Phe Met; Leu; Tyr Ser Thr Thr Ser Trp Tyr TyrTrp; Phe Val Ile; Leu

Transgenes

The expression and/or activity of SBEIIa, SBEIIb or other starchbiosynthesis or modification genes may be altered by introducing one ormore transgenes into the wheat plant. A “transgene” as referred toherein has the normal meaning in the art of biotechnology and includes agenetic sequence which has been produced or altered by recombinant DNAor RNA technology and which has been introduced into the organism orcell, preferably wheat cell, of interest. The transgene may includegenetic sequences derived from the organism or cell, for example anantisense sequence. The transgene typically includes an exogenousnucleic acid which is not derived from said organism or cell.“Transgenic” refers to the organism or cell containing a transgene, orthe genetic sequence that was introduced into the organism or cell orits progenitor. “Non-transgenic” refers to the absence of any transgenein the genome. A transgene is preferably integrated into the genome ofthe organism or cell, for stable inheritance.

Those skilled in the art will be aware that expression of a gene or acomplementary sequence thereto in a cell requires said gene to be placedin operable connection with a promoter sequence. The choice of promoterfor the present purpose may vary depending upon the level of expressionrequired and/or the tissue, organ and species in which expression is tooccur, and is preferably an endosperm specific promoter that providespreferential expression in the developing endosperm of wheat.

Placing a nucleic acid molecule under the regulatory control of apromoter sequence means positioning said molecule such that expressionis controlled by the promoter sequence. A promoter is usually, but notnecessarily, positioned upstream, or at the 5′-end, of the nucleic acidmolecule it regulates. Furthermore, the regulatory elements comprising apromoter are usually positioned within 2 kb of the start site oftranscription of the gene. In the construction of heterologouspromoter/structural gene combinations, it is generally preferred toposition the promoter at a distance from the gene transcription startsite that is approximately the same as the distance between thatpromoter and the gene it controls in its natural setting (i.e., the genefrom which the promoter is derived). As is known in the art, somevariation in this distance can be accommodated without loss of promoterfunction. Similarly, the preferred positioning of a regulatory sequenceelement with respect to a heterologous gene to be placed under itscontrol is defined by the positioning of the element in its naturalsetting (i.e., the gene from which it is derived). Again, as is known inthe art, some variation in this distance can also occur.

Examples of promoters suitable for use in gene constructs of the presentinvention include promoters derived from the genes of viruses, yeast,moulds, bacteria, insects, birds, mammals and plants, preferably thosecapable of functioning in plant cells, more preferably those capable ofbeing expressed in the endosperm of wheat. The promoter may regulateexpression constitutively, or differentially, with respect to the tissuein which expression occurs. Alternatively, expression may bedifferential with respect to the developmental stage at which expressionoccurs, or in response to external stimuli such as physiologicalstresses, or temperature.

The method of reducing SBEIIa, SBEIIb or other starch biosynthetic geneactivity may comprise the step of introducing a transgene into aregenerable cell of wheat and regenerating a transgenic wheat plant fromthe transformed cell. The branching enzymes involved in synthesis ofamylopectin include SBEI, SBEIIa and SBEIIb and the inventionencompasses a reduced expression of SBEIIa alone or in combination withalteration of SBEIIb or SBEI expression. Therefore, the transgene(s) mayinactivate more than one of these genes. Moreover, the inactivation ofSBEIIb and/or SBEI may be direct, in that the transgene (e.g. encodingduplex RNA, antisense, or ribozyme RNA, see below) directly targets theSBEIIb or SBEI gene expression, or it may indirectly result in thealteration in the expression of SBEIIb or SBEI. For example, thetransgene RNA may target only the SBEIIa gene/RNA in terms of sequenceidentity or basepairing but also result in reduction of SBEIIb or SBEIactivity by altering protein stability or distribution in the endosperm.Additionally forms of the present invention reside in the combination ofan altered activity of SBEIIa and an alteration of one or more otheramylopectin synthesis enzymes, which enzymes may include SSI, SSIIa,SSIIb, SSIII, phosphorylase and debranching enzymes such as isoamylaseor pullulanase. Expression of any or all of these may be altered byintroduction of a transgene.

Several DNA sequences are known for amylopectin synthesis genes inwheat, any of which can be the basis for designing transgenes forinactivation of the genes in wheat. These include SBEIIa (GenBankaccession numbers Y11282, AF338431 and AF338432) and SBEIIb (WO00/15810, WO 01/62934). The SBEI gene of wheat is described in Rahman etal., (1997) and Rahman et al., (1999). The Triticum tauschii sequencefor SBEI, which is highly homologous to the wheat D genome SBEI gene,can be found in published Patent specification WO 99/14314. A cDNAsequence for SBEI of wheat can be accessed in the GenBank database underaccession number AF076679. Homologues of other amylopectin synthesisinggenes from barley or other closely related species can also be used tomodify gene expression levels in wheat. Such genes or fragments thereofcan be obtained by methods well known in the art, including PCRamplification or hybridization to labeled probes.

“Stringent hybridization conditions” as used herein means thathybridization will generally occur if there is at least 90% andpreferably at least 95% sequence identity between the probe and thetarget sequence. Examples of stringent hybridization conditions areovernight incubation in a solution comprising 50% formamide, 5×SSC(1×SSC=150 mM NaCl, 15 mM trisodium citrate), 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH7.6), 5×Denhardt's solution, 10% dextran sulfate, and 20 μg/ml denaturedsheared carrier DNA such as salmon sperm DNA, followed by washing thehybridization support in 0.1×SSC at approximately 65° C. Otherhybridization and wash conditions are well known and are exemplified inSambrook et al, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Second Edition,Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. (1989), particularly chapter 11.

The region(s) of the homologues used in preparing the transgeneconstruct should have at least 85% identity to the corresponding wheatgene or gene region, preferably at least 90% and even more preferably95-100% identity in the appropriate region. It is also preferred thatthe transgene specifically target the amylopectin synthesis genesexpressed in the endosperm of wheat and have less or minimal effect onamylopectin synthesis elsewhere in the plant. This may be achieved byuse of suitable regulatory sequences such as endosperm-specificpromoters in the transgene.

Antisense

Genetic engineering approaches to altering, in particular specificallyreducing, gene activity in plants such as wheat are well known in theart. These methods include the introduction of gene constructs forexpression of a suitable antisense molecule that comprises nucleotidesthat are complementary in sequence to at least part of the RNA of thetarget gene and can hybridize with it. Antisense molecules are thoughtto interfere with the translation or processing or stability of the mRNAof the target gene, thereby inactivating expression of the gene. Methodsof devising antisense sequences are well known in the art and examplesof these can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,190,131, European patentspecification 0467349-A1, European patent specification 0223399-A1 andEuropean patent specification 0240208, which are incorporated herein byreference. The use of antisense methods in plants has been reviewed byBourque (1995) and Senior (1998). Bourque lists a large number ofexamples of gene inactivation using antisense sequences in plantsystems. She also states that attaining 100% inhibition of an enzymeactivity may not be necessary as partial inhibition will more thanlikely result in measurable change in the system. Senior (1998) statesthat antisense methods are now a very well established technique formanipulating gene expression in plants.

Antisense molecules for wheat SBEIIa, SBEIIb, SBEI or other starchbiosynthesis or modification genes can be based on the wheat mRNAsequences or derived from homologous DNA or mRNA sequences obtained fromother species, for example barley. The antisense sequences maycorrespond to all or part of the transcripts of any of these genes orfor sequences that effect control over their expression, for exampletheir splicing. The antisense sequence may correspond to the targetedcoding region of the wheat SBEIIa or other gene, or the 5′-untranslatedregion (UTR) or the 3′-UTR or combination of these. It may becomplementary in part to intron sequences, which may be spliced outduring or after transcription, preferably only to exon sequences of thetarget gene. In view of the generally greater divergence of the UTRs,targeting these regions provides greater specificity of gene inhibition.In particular embodiments, the length of the antisense sequence is atleast 19 contiguous nucleotides, at least 50, at least 100, at least200, at least 500 or at least 1000 nucleotides corresponding to thecomplement of the gene RNA sequence. The full-length sequencecomplementary to the entire gene transcript may be used. In a particularembodiment, the length of the antisense sequence is 100-2000nucleotides. In further embodiments, the degree of sequence identity ofthe antisense sequence to the complement of the targeted transcript isat least 85%, at least 90% or 95-100%. The antisense RNA molecule may ofcourse comprise unrelated sequences which may function to stabilize themolecule.

Cosuppression

Another molecular biological approach that may be used isco-suppression. The mechanism of co-suppression is not well understoodbut is thought to involve post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) andin that regard may be very similar to many examples of antisensesuppression. It involves introducing an extra copy of a gene or afragment thereof into a plant in the sense orientation with respect to apromoter for its expression. The size of the sense fragment, itscorrespondence to target gene regions, and its degree of sequenceidentity to the target gene are as for the antisense sequences describedabove. In some instances the additional copy of the gene sequenceinterferes with the expression of the target plant gene. Reference ismade to Patent specification WO 97/20936 and European patentspecification 0465572 for methods of implementing co-suppressionapproaches.

Double Stranded RNA-Mediated Gene Silencing

A further method that might be employed to introduce genetic variationinto the wheat plant is duplex or double stranded RNA mediated genesilencing. This method also involves PTGS. In this method a DNA isintroduced that directs the synthesis of an at least partly doublestranded RNA product(s) with homology to the target gene to beinactivated. The DNA therefore comprises both sense and antisensesequences that, when transcribed into RNA, can hybridize to form thedouble-stranded RNA region. In a preferred embodiment, the sense andantisense sequences are separated by a spacer region that comprises anintron which, when transcribed into RNA, is spliced out. Thisarrangement has been shown to result in a higher efficiency of genesilencing. The double-stranded region may comprise one or two RNAmolecules, transcribed from either one DNA region or two. The presenceof the double stranded molecule triggers a response from an endogenousplant system that destroys both the double stranded RNA and also thehomologous RNA transcript from the target plant gene, efficientlyreducing or eliminating the activity of the target gene. Reference ismade to Australian Patent specification 99/29514-A and Patentspecification WO 99/53050 for methods of implementing this technique. Inparticular embodiments, the length of the sense and antisense sequencesthat hybridise are at least 19 contiguous nucleotides, at least 30, atleast 50, at least 100, at least 200, at least 500 or at least 1000nucleotides. The full-length sequence corresponding to the entire genetranscript may be used. In a particular embodiment, the lengths are inthe range 100-2000 nucleotides. In further embodiments, the degree ofsequence identity of the sense and antisense sequences to the targetedtranscript is at least 85%, at least 90% or 95-100%. The RNA moleculemay of course comprise unrelated sequences which may function tostabilize the molecule. The RNA molecule may be expressed under thecontrol of a RNA polymerase II or RNA polymerase III promoter. Examplesof the latter include tRNA or snRNA promoters. The double-stranded RNAmolecule may also comprise sequences from more than one gene, joinedtogether, and thereby target multiple genes.

Ribozymes

The genetic variation responsible for the desired inactivation of geneexpression in wheat may comprise a nucleic acid molecule encoding one ormore ribozymes. Ribozymes are RNA molecules with enzymatic or catalyticfunction that can cleave other RNA molecules at specific sites definedby one or often two hybridizing sequences. The cleavage of the RNAinactivates the expression of the target gene. The ribozymes may alsoact as an antisense molecule, which may contribute to the geneinactivation. The ribozymes contain one or more catalytic domains,preferably of the hammerhead or hairpin type, between the hybridizingsequences. Other ribozyme motifs may be used including RNAseP, Group Ior II introns, and hepatitis delta virus types. Reference is made toEuropean patent specification 0321201 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,221,661. Theuse of ribozymes to inactivate genes in transgenic plants has beendemonstrated, for example by Wegener et al (1994).

Genetic Constructs/Vectors

The invention also provides isolated nucleic acid molecules comprisingRNA or DNA, preferably DNA, which encode the gene-inhibiting molecule.In certain embodiments, the nucleic acid molecules encode antisense,sense (co-suppression), double-stranded RNA or ribozyme molecules whichtarget the wheat SBEIIa gene sequence and which inactivate itsexpression in endosperm of wheat grain. The invention also providesgenetic constructs comprising or encoding the isolated nucleic acidmolecule, comprising one or more regulatory elements such as promoters,enhancers and transcription termination or polyadenylation sequences.Such elements are well known in the art. The genetic constructs may alsocomprise intron sequences that aid expression of the transgene inplants, particularly in monocotyledonous plants such as wheat. The term“intron” is used in its normal sense as meaning a genetic segment thatis transcribed but does not encode protein and which is spliced out ofan RNA before translation. Introns may be incorporated in a 5′-UTR or acoding region if the transgene encodes a translated product, or anywherein the transcribed region if it does not.

The invention further provides vectors, for example plasmid vectors,comprising the genetic constructs. The term “vector” includes anexpression vector, being capable of in vitro or in vivo expression, anda transformation vector, capable of being transferred from one cell ororganism to another. The vectors comprise sequences that provide forreplication in cells, for example in prokaryotic cells such as E. colior Agrobacterium. In a particular embodiment, the vector is a binaryvector comprising a T-DNA sequence, defined by at least one T-DNA bordersequence, that can be introduced into wheat cells. The invention furtherprovides cells comprising the vectors, for example Agrobacterium orwheat cells which may be regenerable cells such as the cells of thescutellum of immature embryos. Alternatively, the cells may betransformed wheat cells comprising the transgene.

Promoters/terminators

In another embodiment, the transgene or other genetic construct of theinvention includes a transcriptional initiation region (promoter) thatmay provide for regulated or constitutive expression in the endosperm ofwheat. The promoter may be tissue specific, conferring expressionselectively or exclusively in the endosperm. The promoter may beselected from either endosperm-specific (such as High Molecular WeightGlutenin promoter, the wheat SSI promoter, wheat SBEII promoter, wheatGBSS promoter) or promoters not specific for the endosperm (such asubiquitin promoter or CaMV35S or enhanced 35S promoters). The promotermay be modulated by factors such as temperature, light or stress.Ordinarily, the promoter would be provided 5′ of the genetic sequence tobe expressed. The construct may also contain other elements that enhancetranscription such as the nos 3′ or the ocs 3′ polyadenylation regionsor transcription terminators. The regions of DNA illustrated will beincorporated into vectors containing suitable selectable marker genesequences and other elements, or into vectors that are co-transformedwith vectors containing these sequences.

Transformation Methods for Wheat

Methods for transformation of monocotyledonous plants such as wheat,that is for introducing genetic variation into the plant by introductionof an exogenous nucleic acid, and for regeneration of plants fromprotoplasts or immature plant embryos are well known in the art, see forexample, Becker et al 1994, Cheng et al 1997, He et al 1994, Hess et al1990, Nehra et al 1994, Vasil et al 1992, Vasil et al 1993, Weeks et al1993, Weir et al 2001, Australian Patent Application No. 75460/94,European Patent Application No. 709462, International Patent PublicationNos. WO93/04178, WO89/12012, WO94/13822 and WO99/14314. Vectors carryingthe desired nucleotide sequence or genetic construct and a selectablemarker may be introduced into regenerable wheat cells of tissue culturedplants or explants, or suitable plant systems such as protoplasts. Theselectable marker gene may provide antibiotic or herbicide resistance tothe wheat cells, or allow the utilization of substrates such as mannose.The selectable marker preferably confers asulam, geneticin or hygromycinresistance to the wheat cells. The regenerable wheat cells arepreferably from the scutellum of immature embryos, mature embryos,callus derived from these, or the meristematic tissue.

The transformed plant may contain a selectable marker gene, or such genemay be removed during or after regeneration, for example by excision ofthe selectable marker gene out of the genome or by segregation of theselectable marker gene away from the SBEIIa-inhibiting transgene.

Plants where the transgene or mutation has been integrated into achromosome can be screened for by, for example, using a suitable nucleicacid probe specific for the transgene or phenotypic observation. Any ofseveral methods may be employed to determine the presence of atransformed plant. For example, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) may beused to amplify sequences that are unique to the transformed plant, withdetection of the amplified products by gel electrophoresis or othermethods. DNA may be extracted from the plants using conventional methodsand the PCR reaction carried out using primers that will distinguish thetransformed and non-transformed plants. For example, primers may bedesigned that will amplify a region of DNA from the transformationvector reading into the construct and the reverse primer designed fromthe gene of interest. These primers will only amplify a fragment if theplant has been successfully transformed. An alternative method toconfirm a positive transformant is by Southern blot hybridization, wellknown in the art. Plants which are transformed or mutant may also beidentified i.e. distinguished from non-transformed or wild-type plantsby their phenotype, for example conferred by the presence of aselectable marker gene, or the presence of a particular protein byimmunological methods, or by the absence of a protein, for example thatabsence of the SBEIIa protein in the endosperm as detected by ELISAassay or Western blot analysis. An indication used in screening suchplants might also be by observation of the phenotypic traits of thegrain, for example by visual inspection or measurement of shrunkengrain, or testing for elevated amylose content, or checkingmicroscopically for the presence of birefringence.

Mutation

Introduction of the genetic variation leading to reduced activity of theSBEIIa enzyme or other starch biosynthetic enzyme in the wheat endospermmay also be achieved by the appropriate mutations within the respectivegene or regulatory sequences of the gene. In the context of thisapplication, an “induced mutation” is an artificially induced geneticvariation which may be the result of chemical, radiation orbiologically-based mutagenesis, for example transposon or T-DNAinsertion. The extent to which the gene is inhibited will to some degreedetermine the characteristics of the starch made. The mutations may betruncation or null mutations and these are known to have a significantimpact on the nature of the starch, however an altered starch structurewill also result from a leaky mutation that sufficiently reducesamylopectin synthesis enzyme activity to provide the characteristic ofinterest in the starch or grain of wheat. Other chromosomalrearrangements may also be effective and these might include insertions,deletions, inversions, duplication or point mutations. A “null mutation”as used herein refers to a mutation which results in the complete ornear complete loss of activity of the gene of interest such as, forexample, where the gene activity can no longer be detected.

The SBEIIa gene is located on the long arm of chromosome 2. It ispreferred that mutations to the gene or other genes, particularlydeletion mutations, are localised to the gene of interest, for examplethe SBEIIa gene or perhaps extended to the linked SBEIIb gene in thecase of a double mutant. A gene in this context includes the promoterregion and transcription termination/polyadenylation signals as well asthe transcribed region. The transcribed region includes the proteincoding region(s) and the 5′ untranslated and 3′ untranslated regions ofthe mRNA as well any intron regions that may be present. Mutations to agene may be in any region of the gene or a combination of regions andmight extend from altering only one nucleotide, for example a frameshiftmutation in the coding region, to deletion of the entire gene. Plantswhich are homozygous for the genetic variation are preferred.

Deletions may be restricted in size in the order of one or a fewhundred, perhaps 500, kilobases. In certain embodiments, the deletionextends to less than a few thousand kilobases, or less than 5 thousandkilobases. Whilst the invention may encompass larger deletions includingmuch of the long arm of chromosome 2 of the respective genome these arenot preferred because the long arm of chromosome 2 has a number of othergenes localised thereon that impact on the vigour of the wheat plant.Accordingly, where large deletions occur, these impact adversely on thevigour of the plant and hence on its commercial viability, and it isdesired that at least a majority of the long arm of chromosome 2 ispresent. In a preferred embodiment, the majority of the long arm ofchromosome 2A is present.

Mutagenesis can be achieved by chemical or radiation means, for exampleEMS or sodium azide (Zwar and Chandler, 1995) treatment of seed, orgamma irradiation. Isolation of mutants may be achieved by screeningmutagenised plants or seed. For example, a mutagenized population ofwheat may be screened for high amylose content in the grain and/orlonger than normal amylopectin chain length distribution, or loss of theSBEIIa protein by ELISA, or for altered grain morphology (Green et al.,1997). Screening is preferably done in a wheat genotype that alreadylacks one of the SBE activities, for example in a SBEIIb-negativebackground. Alternatively, the mutation may be identified usingtechniques such as “tilling” in a population mutagenised with an agentsuch as EMS (Slade et al, 2005). Such mutations may then be introducedinto desirable genetic backgrounds by crossing the mutant with a plantof the desired genetic background and performing a suitable number ofbackcrosses to cross out the originally undesired parent background.

In another embodiment, the mutation affects the expression or activityof both SBEIIa and SBEIIb genes in wheat. Identifying such a mutation isaided by the unexpected finding that the two genes are closely linked inwheat, in contrast to maize or rice. Deletions in one gene may readilyextend to the other gene, providing a null allele (null mutation) forboth genes. This knowledge also aids the screening of natural variantsthat are mutant in both genes on at least one genome of wheat, and morereadily allows screening to produce wheat with combined mutations inboth genes in two or three genomes. Such wheat provides a high amylose,non-transgenic source of wheat grain and products therefrom.

Mutations in the genes encoding the SBEIIa or other enzymes involved inamylopectin synthesis will generally cause an increased proportion ofamylose content. The amount of amylose per individual grain may beincreased as a consequence of diverted carbon flow from amylopectin toamylose, or it may be decreased if there is a significant decrease instarch production per grain. In either case, the relative level ofamylose as a percentage of starch increases.

Seed with starch granules having a distorted shape have been reported inhigh amylose barley (Morell et al, 2003) and in low amylopectin (LAPS)maize having about 90% amylose in starch (Sidebottom et al., 1998).

Birefringence is the ability of a substance to refract light in twodirections; this produces a dark cross called a “maltese cross” on eachstarch granule when viewed with a polarizing microscope. Birefringenceis an indicator of the degree of ordered structural organization of thepolymers within the granules (Thomas and Atwell, 1999). Loss ofbirefringence in starch granules is generally well correlated withincreased amylose content.

It will be understood that whilst various indications have been given asto aspects of the present invention, the invention may reside incombinations of two or more aspects of the present invention.

EXAMPLES Example 1 Materials and Methods

Carbohydrate Determination and Analysis

Starch was isolated from wheat grain using the method of Schulman et al.(1991). Starch content was determined using the total starch analysiskit supplied by Megazyme (Bray, Co Wicklow, Republic of Ireland).

The amylose content of starch samples was determined by the colorimetric(iodometric) method of Morrison and Laignelet (1983) with slightmodifications as follows. Approximately 2 mg of starch was weighedaccurately (to 0.1 mg) into a 2 ml screw-capped tube fitted with arubber washer in the lid. To remove lipid, 1 ml of 85% (v/v) methanolwas mixed with the starch and the tube heated in a 65° C. water bath for1 hour with occasional vortexing. After centrifugation at 13,000 g for 5min, the supernatant was carefully removed and the extraction stepsrepeated. The starch was then dried at 65° C. for 1 hour and dissolvedin urea-dimethyl sulphoxide solution (UDMSO; 9 volumes of dimethylsulphoxide to 1 volume of 6 M urea), using 1 ml of UDMSO per 2 mg ofstarch (weighed as above). The mixture was immediately vortexedvigorously and incubated in a 95° C. water bath for 1 hour withintermittent vortexing for complete dissolution of the starch. Analiquot of the starch-UDMSO solution (50 μl) was treated with 20 μl ofI₂-KI reagent that contained 2 mg iodine and 20 mg potassium iodide perml of water. The mixture was made up to 1 ml with water. The absorbanceof the mixture at 650 nm was measured by transferring 200 μl tomicroplate and reading the absorbance using an Emax Precision MicroplateReader (Molecular Devices, USA). Standard samples containing from 0 to100% amylose and 100% to 0% amylopectin were made from potato amyloseand corn (or potato) amylopectin (Sigma) and treated as for the testsamples. The amylose content (percentage amylose) was determined fromthe absorbance values using a regression equation derived from theabsorbances for the standard samples. Analysis of theamylose/amylopectin ratio of non-debranched starches may also be carriedout according to Case et al., (1998) or by an HPLC method for separatingdebranched starches as described by Batey and Curtin (1996).

The distribution of chain lengths in the starch was analysed byfluorophore assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis (FACE) using acapillary electrophoresis unit according to Morell et al (1998), afterdebranching of the starch samples. The gelatinisation temperatureprofiles of starch samples may be measured in a Pyris 1 differentialscanning calorimeter (Perkin Elmer, Norwalk Conn., USA). The viscosityof starch solutions may be measured on a Rapid-Visco-Analyser (RVA,Newport Scientific Pty Ltd, Warriewood, Sydney), for example usingconditions as reported by Batey et al., 1997. The parameters that may bemeasured include peak viscosity (the maximum hot paste viscosity),holding strength, final viscosity and pasting temperature. The swellingvolume of flour or starch may be determined according to the method ofKonik-Rose et al (2001). The uptake of water is measured by weighing thesample prior to and after mixing the flour or starch sample in water atdefined temperatures and following collection of the gelatinizedmaterial.

Enzyme Assay

Total starch synthase activity in endosperm may be measured byextraction of proteins and assay by the methods described in Libessartet al. (19995) or Cao et al. (1999). The assays use ¹⁴C labeled ADPGsubstrate and measure incorporation of the monomer into starch polymers.Individual isoforms of starch synthase in extracts may be separated bygel electrophoresis and assayed in-gel (zymogram) as follows. Extractsfrom developing seeds may be prepared using 50 mM potassium phosphatebuffer, pH7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 20% glycerol, 10 μM Pefabloc and 0.05 mMdithiothreitol (DTT). After grinding the seeds to a pulp in the buffer,the mixture is centrifuged at 14,000 g for 15 min at 4° C. and thesupernatant drawn off. The protein concentration in the supernatant maybe measured using Coomassie Protein Reagent or other standard means.Storage of the extracts is at −80° C. if the protein extracts are to berun on native gels. For denaturing gel electrophoresis, 100 μl ofextract is mixed with SDS and β-mercaptoethanol and the mixtures areincubated in boiling water for 4 min to denature the proteins.Electrophoresis is carried out in standard denaturing polyacrylamidegels using 8% polyacrylamide separating gels overlaid with 4.5%polyacrylamide stacking gels. After electophoresis, the proteins may berenatured by soaking the gels in 40 mM Tris-HCl buffers for a minimum of2 hr, changing the buffer every 30 min and using at least 100 mL ofbuffer for each buffer change. For non-denaturing gels, the denaturingstep with SDS and β-mercaptoethanol is omitted and SDS omitted from thegels. A starch synthase assay buffer including Tris-glycine (25 mM Tris,0.19M glycine), 0.133M ammonium sulphate, 10 mM MgCl₂, 670 μg/mL BSA and1 mM ADPG substrate may be used to detect starch synthase bands,followed by staining with 2% KI, 0.2% I₂ iodine solution to detect thestarch product.

Alternatively, starch synthase or other starch biosynthetic enxymes maybe detected in extracts from seeds using specific antibodies (ELISA).

Example 2 Genetic Constructs for the Alteration of Wheat SBEIIa andSBEIIb Expression

Duplex-RNA (dsRNA) constructs were made to reduce the expression ofeither the SBEIIa or SBEIIb genes of wheat. In such constructs, thedesired nucleic acid sequence corresponding to part of the SBEIIa orSBEIIb genes occurred in both the sense and antisense orientationsrelative to the promoter so that the expressed RNA comprisedcomplementary regions that were able to basepair and form a duplex ordouble-stranded RNA. A spacer region between the sense and antisensesequences comprised an intron sequence which, when transcribed as partof the RNA in the transformed plant, would be spliced out to form atight “hairpin” duplex structure. The inclusion of an intron has beenfound to increase the efficiency of gene silencing conferred byduplex-RNA constructs (Smith et al, 2000). The desired nucleic acid waslinked to a high molecular weight glutenin (HMWG) promoter sequence(promoter of the Dx5 subunit gene, Accession No. X12928, Anderson etal., 1989) and terminator sequence from the nopaline synthase gene fromAgrobacterium (nos3′). This provided endosperm specific expression ofthe dsRNA sequences.

The SBEIIa duplex-RNA construct contained 1536 bp of nucleotide sequenceamplified by PCR from the wheat SBEIIa gene (GenBank Accession numberAF338431, see FIG. 1). This included a 468 bp sequence that comprisedthe whole of exons 1 and 2 and part of exon 3 (nucleotide positions 1058to 1336, 1664 to 1761 and 2038 to 2219 in FIG. 1), with EcoRI and KpnIrestriction sites on either side (fragment 1), a 512 bp sequenceconsisting of part of exons 3 and 4 and the whole of intron 3 of SBEIIa(nucleotide positions 2220 to 2731 in FIG. 1) with KpnI and SacI siteson either side (fragment 2) and a 528 bp fragment consisting of thecomplete exons 1, 2 and 3 of SBEIIa (nucleotide positions 1058 to 1336,1664 to 1761 and 2038 to 2279 in FIG. 1) with BamHI and SacI sites oneither side (fragment 3). Fragments 1, 2 and 3 were then ligated so thatthe sequence of fragment 3 was ligated to fragment 2 in the antisenseorientation relative to fragment 1. The duplex-RNA constructs wereinitially generated in the vector pDVO3000 which contains the HMWGpromoter sequence and nos3′ terminator. The gene construct in the vectorpDVO3000 was designated pDVO3-IIa and the duplex-RNA gene designatedds-SBEIIa.

The strategy for the SBEIIb duplex-RNA construct was similar. The SBEIIbconstruct contained a fragment of 1607 bp amplified by PCR from thewheat SBEIIb gene (sequence is outlined in FIG. 2). This included a 471bp sequence that comprised the whole of exons 1 and 2 and part of exon 3(nucleotide positions 489 to 640, 789 to 934 and 1598 to 1769 in FIG.2), with EcoRI and KpnI restriction sites on either side (fragment I), a589 bp sequence consisting of part of exons 3 and 4 and the whole ofintron 3 of SBEIIb (nucleotide positions 1770 to 2364 in FIG. 2) withKpnI and SacI sites on either side (fragment 2) and a 528 bp fragmentconsisting of the complete exons 1, 2 and 3 of SBEIIb (nucleotidepositions 489 to 640, 789 to 934 and 1598 to 1827 in FIG. 2) with BamHIand SacI sites on either side (fragment 3). Fragments 1, 2 and 3 werethen ligated so that the sequence of fragment 3 was ligated to fragment2 in the antisense orientation relative to fragment 1. The SBEIIbduplex-RNA gene construct in the vector pDVO3000 was designatedpDVO3-IIb and the duplex-RNA gene designated ds-SBEIIb. The constructsare shown schematically in FIG. 3.

Each of the ds-RNA expression cassettes was then cut out with therestriction enzyme XhoI and inserted into the binary transformationvectors pGB53 and pBIOS340. pGB53 was created from pSB11 (Komari et al.,1996) by the introduction of the gene encoding asulam resistance (sul)driven by the rice actin promoter, leaving a unique XhoI site adjacentto the right T-DNA border for the introduction of a gene of interest.Similarly, pBIOS340 was created from pSB1 (Komari et al., 1996) by theintroduction of an nptII gene encoding kanamycin and geneticinresistance, driven by the rice actin promoter, again leaving a uniqueXhoI site adjacent to the right border. The SBEIIa constructs in pGB53and pBIOS340 were designated pCL51 and pCL59, respectively, and theSBEIIb constructs in pGB53 and pBIOS340 were designated pCL54 and pCL60,respectively.

Example 3 Transformation of Wheat

Genetic constructs for transformation of wheat were introduced byelectroporation into the disarmed Agrobacterium tumefaciens strainLBA4404 carrying the vir plasmid pAL4-404 and pSB1, with subsequentselection on media with spectinomycin. Transformed Agrobacterium strainswere incubated on solidified YEP media at 27° C. for 2 days. Bacteriawere then collected and re-suspended in TSIM1 (MS media with 100 mg/lmyo-inositol, 10 g/l glucose, 50 mg/l MES buffer pH5.5) containing 400mM acetosyringone to an optical density of 2.4 at 650 nm for wheatinoculation.

Wheat plants (variety NB1, a Spring wheat variety obtained fromNickerson Seeds Ltd, Rothwell, Lincs.) were grown in a glasshouse at22/15° C. day/night temperature with supplemented light to give a 16hour day. Tillers were harvested approximately 14 days post-anthesis(embryos approximately 1 mm in length) to include 50 cm tiller stem. Allleaves were then removed from the tillers except the flag leaf, whichwas cleaned to remove contaminating fungal spores. The glumes of eachspikelet and the lemma from the first two florets were then carefullyremoved to expose the immature seed. Generally, only these two seed ineach spikelet were uncovered. This procedure was carried out along theentire length of the inflorescence. The ears were then sprayed with 70%IMS as a brief surface sterilization.

Agrobacterium suspensions (1 μl) were inoculated using a 10 μl Hamiltonsyringe into the immature seed approximately at the position of thescutellum:endosperm interface so that all exposed seed were inoculated.The tillers were then placed in water, covered with a translucentplastic bag to prevent seed dehydration, and placed in a lit incubatorfor 3 days at 23° C., 16 hr day, 45 μEm⁻²s⁻¹PAR. After 3 days ofco-cultivation, the inoculated immature seed were removed and surfacesterilized with 70% ethanol (30 sec), then 20% bleach (Domestos, 20min), followed by thorough washing in sterile distilled water. Immatureembryos were aseptically isolated and placed on W3 media (MSsupplemented with 20 g/l sucrose and 2 mg/l 2,4-D and solidified with 6g/l Type I agarose, Sigma) with the addition of 150 mg/l Timentin (W3T)and with the scutellum uppermost (20 embryos per plate). Cultures wereplaced at 25° C. in the light (16 hour day, 80 μEm⁻²s⁻¹PAR). Thedevelopment of the embryonic axis on the embryos was assessed about 5days after isolation and the axis was removed where necessary to improvecallus production. The embryos were maintained on W3T for 4 weeks, witha transfer to fresh media at 2 weeks post-isolation and assessed forembryogenic capacity.

After 4 weeks growth, callus derived from the inoculated embryos wasvery similar to control callus obtained from uninoculated embryos platedon W3T medium. Presence of the bacteria did not appear to havesubstantially reduced the embryogenic capacity of the callus derivedfrom the inoculated embryos. Embryogenic calli were transferred to W3media with 2 mg/l Asulam (where pGB53 derivatives were used) orgeneticin at 25 mg/l (pBIOS340 derivatives) and 150 mg/l Timentin(W32AT). Calli were maintained on this media for a further 2 weeks andthen each callus was divided into 2 mm-sized pieces and re-plated ontoW32AT. Control embryos derived from inoculations with the LBA4404without binary vector constructs did not produce transformed callus onselection media.

After a further 2 weeks culture, all tissue was assessed for developmentof embryogenic callus: any callus showing signs of continued developmentafter 4 weeks on selection was transferred to regeneration media (RMT-MSwith 40 g/l maltose and 150 mg/l Timentin, pH 5.8, solidified with 6 g/lagarose, Sigma type 1). Shoots were regenerated within 4 weeks on thismedia and then transferred to MS30 with 150 mg/l Timentin for shootelongation and rooting. Juvenile plants were then transferred to soilmixture and kept on a misting bench for two weeks and finallytransferred to a glasshouse.

A total of 3217 embryos using pCL54 or pCL60 (ds-SBEIIb) and 2010embryos using pCL51 or pCL59 (ds-SBEIIa) were treated by this method and61 plants were regenerated from calli for the IIb transformation and 31plants regenerated from calli for the IIa transformation. Survival onselection medium suggested that they were successfully transformed withthe gene construct. A large majority, but not all, of the plants thatwere transformed with the selectable marker gene would be expected tointegrate the SBEIIa or SBEIIb inhibitory gene; these could readily bedistinguished as described in the following examples.

The recovery of multiple, stable integration events with goodregeneration potential from the experiments indicated that the seedinoculation transformation method used here was as efficient as otherreported methods for wheat. Alternative Agrobacterium strains such asstrain AGL1 or selectable markers such as genes encoding hygromycinresistance can also be used in the method.

Example 4 Analysis of Wheat Transformants

Transformation was determined by one or more of the following methods:

PCR analysis for one or more of the transgenes. PCR analysis wasperformed on genomic DNA extracted from 1-2 cm² of fresh leaf materialusing the mini-prep method described by Stacey and Isaac (1994). PCRreactions were performed, for example, using the primers SBEIIa-For:5′-CCCGCTGCTTTCGCTCATTTTG-3′ [SEQ ID NO. 4] and SBEIIa-Rev:5′-GACTACCGGAGCTCCCACCTTC-3′ [SEQ ED NO. 5] designed to amplify afragment (462 bp) from the SBEIIa gene, or SBEIIb-DupFor5′-AGATGTGAATGGCTGCTTGCTG-3′ [SEQ ID NO. 6] and SBEIIb-DupRev5′-CAGGTCGACCATATGGGAGAGC-3′ [SEQ ID NO. 7] for SBEIIb (505 bp).Reaction conditions were as follows: “hot start” (94° C., 3 min)followed by 30 cycles of denaturation (95° C., 30 sec), annealing (55°C., 30 sec), extension (73° C., 2 min) followed by 1 cycle at 73° C. (5min).

Southern blot hybridization analysis was performed on DNA from a largerscale (9 ml) extraction from lyophilized ground tissue (Stacey andIsaac, 1994). DNA samples were adjusted to 0.2 mg/ml and digested withrestriction enzymes such as HindIII, EcoRI and KpnI. Restriction enzymedigestion, gel electrophoresis and vacuum blotting were carried out asdescribed by Stacey and Isaac (1994). Digoxygenin-labelled probesincluding the intron 3 region of the ds-SBEII constructs were producedby PCR according to the method of McCreery and Helentjaris (1994).Hybridization of the probes to the Southern blot and detection bychemiluminescence were performed according to the method of McCreery andHelentjaris (1994).

The results of the PCR analyses are summarized in Table 2. Plants thatwere positive for the transgenes as demonstrated by PCR included 27independent transformation events for ds-SBEIIa and 61 independentevents for ds-SBEIIb.

TABLE 2 Transformation of wheat with SBEIIa and SBEIIb RNA duplexconstructs. No. of embryos No. of lines PCR positive Experiment No.inoculated regenerated lines ds-SBEIIa construct 44 242 1 1 50 169 3 352 158 3 3 58 163 2 2 61 195 1 1 72 185 1 0 83 241 1 1 84 242 1 1 85 1535 5 109  262 13 10 Total 2010 31 27 ds-SBEIIb construct 48 291 1 1 51166 1 0 53 194 1 0 55 261 1 1 59 253 1 0 60 175 4 2 62 199 1 0 70 152 10 73 238 2 2 75 151 2 2 76 150 1 0 77 150 2 2 81 134 1 1 87 230 5 3 92233 8 5 110  240 29 16 Total 3217 61 35

Example 5 Analysis of Grain from Plants Transformed with Duplex-RNAConstructs

Starch Granule Morphology.

The morphology of starch granules from mature T1 seed obtained from theT0 transformed wheat plants was observed by light microscopy. Tenindividual grains from each of 25 T0 plants independently transformedwith ds-SBEIIa and 12 plants independently transformed with ds-SBEIIbwere analysed. Each endosperm was gently crushed to release the starchgranules, which were dispersed in water and visualized under a lightmicroscope. Of the 25 ds-SBEIIa lines analysed, 12 had grains withdistorted granules although the visual observation revealed varyinglevels of distortion in different seeds. In contrast, none of the 12ds-SBEIIb lines showed significant starch granule distortion in theendosperm when observed under light microscopy.

Observing the starch granules under polarized light revealed that therewas a significant reduction in birefringence for distorted granules forthe ds-SBEIIa grain. Loss of birefringence was observed for 94% of thegranules in seeds from the line 50.1b, correlating with their distortedphenotype, while normal granules from another seed of the same lineshowed full birefringence. The seed with normal granules is presumed tobe a segregant lacking the transgene and therefore phenotypicallynormal.

Light microscopy results were confirmed by scanning electron microscopy(SEM) of the starch granules. To do this, purified starch is sputteredwith gold and scanned at 15 kV at room temperature.

Grain Weight

Individual grains from ds-SBEIIa transformed plants, grown underequivalent conditions in the greenhouse, were weighed (Table 3). Grainshaving severely distorted granules from plants 50.1b, 58.2a, 61.2a and109 were not significantly reduced in average weight compared to grainsof wild-type plants grown under the same conditions. Therefore, starchproduction did not appear to be substantially reduced even in the seedswith highly distorted starch granules. This data also suggests that theyield of field-grown wheat with reduced SBEIIa activity in the endospermis about normal.

TABLE 3 Grain weight of T1 seeds from the ds-SBEIIa transgenic wheatlines Starch Starch Trans- Seed granule Trans- Seed granule genic Seedweight morphol- genic Seed weight morphol- Line No (mg) ogy* Line No(mg) ogy* 50.1b 1 16.9 +  61.2a 1 50.7 + 2 49.8 + 2 49.0 +/− 3 46.9 − 349.8 − 4 50.0 − 4 47.0 − 5 45.4 − 5 48.6 − 6 42.6 − 6 46.2 − 7 39.9 +/−7 42.2 + 8 41.0 + 8 50.4 − 9 39.5 − 9 39.7 − 10 37.0 +/− 10 46.3 − 58.2a1 44.0 − 109.7b 1 40.1 − 2 37.4 + 2 34.6 − 3 48.8 − 3 43.7 − 4 43.2 + 438.8 − 5 46.2 − 5 33.8 +/− 6 42.1 + 6 31.1 +/− 7 43.5 +/− 7 35.9 + 845.7 − 8 44.3 +/− 9 38.8 − 9 37.7 − 10 38.1 +/− 10 41.4 − + normalstarch granules, − severely distorted granules, +/− mild distortion ofgranules

Analysis of SBEIIa and SBEIIb Proteins in T2 Transgenic Wheat Endosperm.

Seed (T2) from 13 ds-SBEIIa transformed T1 plants, representing 5independently transformed lines, and from 9 ds-SBEIIa transformedplants, representing 3 independently transformed lines, were analysedfor SBEIIa and SBEIIb protein expression in endosperm by non denaturingPAGE and Western blotting. The ds-SBEIIa plants were all from lineshaving abnormal starch granule morphology, while the ds-SBEIIb lines allhad normal granule morphology, as described above. The antibody used fordetection of SBEIIa was 3KLH, from rabbits, which had been raisedagainst the synthetic peptide having the amino acid sequenceAASPGKVLVPDESDDLGC [SEQ ID NO. 8], corresponding to the sequence fromthe N-terminus of mature SBEIIa, and was diluted 1:5000 for use. Theantibody used for detection of SBEIIb was R6, raised against thesynthetic peptide having the amino acid sequence AGGPSGEVMIGC [SEQ IDNO. 9], corresponding to the deduced sequence from the N-terminus ofmature SBEIIb and diluted 1:6000 before use. The secondary antibody usedwas GAR-Horseradish Peroxidase conjugate (1:3000 dilution).Immunoreactive bands were revealed using an Amersham ECL-detectionsystem.

Endosperms from each of seven developing grains (15 days post anthesis)from each of the 22 T1 plants were analysed as it was expected that someof the plants would be heterozygous for the transgene. Twelve of the 13ds-SBEIIa plants produced T2 progeny showing reduced levels of SBEIIaprotein in the endosperm. All seven seeds from one line (50.3x.9)appeared to lack SBEIIa entirely, while all seven seeds from four otherplants showed obviously reduced expression of SBEIIa. These couldrepresent lines that are homozygous for the transgene. Seven lines weresegregating for the absence of SBEIIa or reduced levels of SBEIIa, or insome cases no apparent reduction of the protein, and these linesprobably represent heterozygotes for the transgene. The thirteenth line(50.3x.6) was homozygous for wild type expression.

Of the nine ds-SBEIIb transgenic lines tested, three (110.166.2,110.16b.5 and 110.16b.19) uniformly showed no SBEIIb expression in eachof seven progeny seeds, while two were uniform for wild type expressionand the remaining four were segregating for no expression, reducedexpression or wild-type. Embryos from the seeds may be grown (embryorescue) to produce T2 plants and T3 seed which are screened by PCR andprotein expression analysis to confirm the genetic status of the T2 seedwith respect to the transgene.

These data indicate that the duplex-RNA constructs were effective inreducing the expression of the SBEIIa and SBEIIb genes in endosperm ofwheat. The data also indicate that reduction of SBEIIb expression alonedid not substantially alter starch granule morphology.

The expression of the SBEIIb gene in transgenic seeds containing theds-SBEIIa transgene and lacking SBEIIa protein, and the expression ofthe SBEIIa gene in seeds containing the ds-SBEIIb were also analyzed bythe Western blot method. Unexpectedly, transgenic seeds comprisingds-SBEIIa were much reduced for SBEIIb. However, the converse effect wasnot observed in seeds transgenic for ds-SBEIIb. The SBEIIa expressionwas unaltered in the seeds in which SBEIIb was completely silenced byds-SBEIIb. It is possible that expression of SBEIIb was suppressed bythe ds-SBEIIa construct due to sequence homology between the genes inthe region used for the duplex construct, it is also possible that theactivity of SBEIIb was reduced by the ds-SBEIIa transgene by some othermechanism.

The expression levels of the SBEIIa and SBEIIb genes can also bespecifically determined at the mRNA levels through standard techniquessuch as Northern hybridisation or RT-PCR methods, for example by usingprobes from non conserved regions or primer pairs which hybridize tounique sites in one of the genes but not the other, for example in the3′ untranslated regions. Such regions or sites can readily be identifiedby comparison of the two gene sequences.

Example 6 Starch Analysis of Transformed Wheat

Amylose and Amylopectin Levels in Transgenic Wheat Grain.

The amylose content of starches from six pooled T1 seed samples wasdetermined as described in Example 1. The pooled seed samples wereobtained from the transgenic wheat lines as follows:

Pool 1—seed that had distorted starch granules from the ds-SBEIIatransgenic line 85.2c

Pool 2—seed that had normal granules from the ds-SBEIIa transgenic line85.1a

Pool 3—seed that had normal granules from the ds-SBEIIb transgenic line110.18a

Pool 4—seed that had distorted granules from the ds-SBEIIa transgeniclines 58.1a, 58.2a and 61.2a, pooled together

Pool 5—seed that had normal granules from the ds-SBEIIa transgenic line83.1b

Pool 6—seed that had normal granules from the ds-SBEIIb transgenic line75.3x.

Each analysis was done using four replicates of the starch samples. Theregression equation used to convert the absorbance to amylose contentfor these analyses was Y=57.548x−8.793, where Y was the amylose content(%) and x was the absorbance.

The results are given in the Table below. The presence of distortedstarch granules was clearly associated with increased relative amylosecontents. Starches from grains with distorted granules from theds-SBEIIa transgenic lines (pools 1 and 4) had relative amylose contentsof greater than 50% while the other starch pools, derived from grainwith normal starch granules, had amylose contents in the range 21-26%.This included starch from line IIb 110.18a which had reduced expressionof SBEIIb, which suggested that inactivation of SBEIIb alone in wheatdid not substantially increase amylose levels in grain starch.

TABLE 4 Amylose content estimated by iodometric method of the transgenicwheat lines Starch Transgenic Amylose content (%) sample lineReplication 1 Replication 2 Replication 3 Mean Pool 1 85.2c 65.7 54.253.2 57.7 Pool 2 85.1a 23.7 22.5 26.7 24.3 Pool 3 110.18a 22.3 21.0 21.521.6 Pool 4 58.1, 58.2a, 53.9 52.8 58.5 55.1 61.2a Pool 5 83.1b 26.525.3 24.8 25.6 Pool 6 75.3x 24.3 20.6 19.5 21.5A second set of analyses was done by the iodometric method using asample from Pool 4 and starch from wheat that was defective in SSII(Yamamori et al. 2000) and from barley line M292 which was mutant inSSIIa. The amylose content determined for starch from Pool 4 wheat seeds(ds-SBEIIa transgenic lines) was considerably higher than that of starchfrom the SSII mutants of wheat and barley.

This implied that the amylopectin content in the starch of these grainswas considerably reduced, from about 75% in wild-type to less than 50%or even less than 20%.

Lines containing both ds-SBEIIa and ds-SBEIIb transgenes were generatedby crossing the transgenic plants described above. Relative amylosecontents in the grain starch of such progeny were elevated to the sameextent compared to starch from plants containing only ds-SBEIIa, in therange of 75 or 80% as measured by Sepharose column methods (Example 8),when the ds-SBEIIa gene was introduced into the F1 plants from thefemale parent and the ds-SBEIIb gene from the male parent. Lower levelsof amylose (55-60%) were observed in F1 progeny from the reciprocalcross. The difference could be due to the triploid nature of theendosperm which contains two copies of the maternal genome and one copyof the paternal genome. This indicated that the copy number of theds-SBEIIa gene influenced the extent of the elevation in amylose levels,and was consistent with higher amylose levels in homozygotes thanheterozygotes.

Discussion

There are three known mechanisms for increasing amylose content inplants: i) to increase GBSS activity, for example, over-expression ofGBSS has recently been reported to yield a rice starch with increasedamylose content (Itoh et. al., 2003); ii) to decrease amylopectinsynthesis by suppression of the activity of starch synthases andisoamylases leading to a net increase in amylose content, for example,amylose contents of 35-45% have been in reported in maize sugary-2, su1and du-1 (Gao et. al., 1998) and wheat Sgp-1 (Yamamori et al., 2000)mutants, or greater than 70% amylose in a barley variety lacking SSIIaactivity (Morell et al., 2003). As shown herein, the third mechanism forincreasing amylose content was to suppress the activity of starchbranching enzymes, with reduction in SBEIIa and SBEIIb in wheatresulting in starch with an amylose content of >70%, with concomitantchanges in starch granule morphology, starch composition, and starchfine structure. This result contrasted with previous findings in maize(Garwood et al., 1976) and rice (Mizuno et al 1993) where reduction inSBEIIb was required for high amylose starch. The results with thehp-SBEIIa construct described above demonstrated that suppression ofstarch branching enzyme activity in the grain, including at leastSBEIIa, provided a high amylose phenotype.

Example 7 Mutation of SBEIIa Gene in Wheat

Mutation of the SBEIIa gene in wheat leading to reduced activity ofSBEIIa can be achieved through mutagenesis, for example either gamma rayirradiation or chemical mutagenesis using agents such as ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS). For gamma ray induced mutation, seeds may be irradiatedat a dose of 20-50 kR from a ⁶⁰Co source (Zikiryaeva and Kasimov, 1972).EMS mutagenesis may be performed by treating the seeds with EMS (0.03%,v/v) as per Mullins et al., (1999). In a B+D double null background,mutant grains may be identified on the basis of increased amylosecontent or altered starch grain morphology and confirmed by the methodsdescribed above. Mutants in SBEIIa that retain SBEIIb activity can bere-mutagenized and the progeny screened for loss of SBEIIb activity inaddition to SBEIIa, or the SBEIIa mutant can be crossed with an SBEIIbmutant to combine the mutations and produce a non-transgenic variety ofwheat substantially lacking SBEII activity in the endosperm.

In an attempt to identify a wheat line having a mutation in an SBEIIa orSBEIIb gene, 2400 hexaploid wheat accessions were screened for nullmutations of SBEIIb in the A, B or D genomes. The primersAR2b19cF/AR2b23cR were used in PCR reactions on genomic DNA samples ofwheat plants of each line, followed by digestion of the amplificationproducts with RsaI and gel electrophoresis. This marker amplified theintron 3 region (nucleotide positions 2085 to 2336 in wheat SBEIIb gene,FIG. 2) and was specific for SBEIIb. This screening had resulted in theidentification of three D genome SBEII-null mutants and two B genomeSBEII-null mutants as described in the Examples above. No mutant lineswhich lacked the A genome band corresponding to SBEIIb were detected.This suggested that wheat lines comprising chromosome 2A with a mutantSBEIIb gene do not occur naturally.

A gamma ray (⁶⁰Co source) induced mutant wheat population generated byTony Prior and Rohit Mago (CSIRO) was used to screen for inducedmutations in wheat SBEII. The wheat population was generated from the F2progeny of a cross, Gabo 1BL.1RS×Veery 3. A total of 2694 mutant seedsfrom this population were screened as described above in PCR reactionswith the primers AR2b19cF and AR2b23cR. Two seeds, designated MLT2B8 andMLT2D1, that came from one plant, were identified that lacked the SBEIIbA genome allele. No seeds in the population were identified to containnull mutations of SBEIIb in the B or D genomes.

Since the SBEIIa and SBEIIb genes were closely linked in wheat on thelong arm of chromosome 2, DNA from seeds was tested for the presence orabsence of the A genome SBEIIa gene with PCR reactions using the primersSr913F/E6R. These primers amplify the intron 5 region of wSBEII-D1(nucleotide positions 2959 to 3189, FIG. 1 [SEQ ID No. 1]). Afteramplification, the products were electrophoresed on a 5% sequencing gel(ABI Prism DNA sequencer). Fluorescently labeled products were analysedusing the software Genescan. The scan profiles showed that theamplification products for both of the mutant seeds MLT2B8 and MLT2D1lacked the product corresponding to the A genome SBEIIa gene, indicatingthat both seeds had null alleles for the A genome SBEIIa in addition toSBEIIb.

The null mutations in these seeds were further confirmed by using an Agenome specific marker for SBEIIa, ARIIaAF(5′-GCAAAAGCCAGATCATAAATTTAGAGC-3′) [SEQ ID NO. 10] and ARIIaAR(5′-CTTCCAATTCATTGTTAATGGTCACAC-3′) [SEQ ID NO. 11] that amplify onlythe product from A genome SBEIIa gene (nucleotide positions 3024 to 3131of wSBEII-DA1, FIG. 1). While this pair of primers amplified a 110 bpproduct from plant material from the variety Chinese Spring, thisproduct was clearly missing in the two putative mutant seeds. This wasthe same as for the negative control dt2AS, which is a chromosomeengineered line of Chinese Spring that is missing the long arm ofchromosome 2A. Since the SBEIIa and SBEIIb genes are located on the longarm of chromosome 2, this line lacks the A genome allele of both thesegenes and hence could be used as a negative control.

Five lines having mutation in both the B and D genome SBEIIa and SBEIIbgenes had been generated. Of these, lines such as BD 219 and BD 636 maybe crossed to an A null mutant line and a doubled haploid population maybe generated from the F1 seeds of these crosses to provide homozygoustriple null mutant plants. Such triple null mutant plants should occurin doubled haploid populations at a frequency of 1 in 8. The A genomenull mutations can be combined with either the B genome mutations or theD genome mutations by similar crosses. In further crosses, any of thenull alleles can be introduced into any suitable genetic background foragronomic or other traits.

Crosses may also be performed to produce durum wheat (such as, forexample, variety Wollaroi) having mutations in the A genome or B genomeSBEIIa and SBEIIb, or both A and B genome mutations for both genes toproduce durum wheat lacking SBEII activity.

Such durum wheat is non-transgenic and has a high amylose phenotypewhich provides health benefits similar to that of high amylose hexaploidwheat.

Example 8 Confirmation of the High Amylose Content in Grain by Sepharose2B Column Separation Methods

The amylose content of starch in the grain of transgenic wheat plantscontaining SBEIIa/SBEIIb inhibitory genetic constructs was determined bya Sepharose column separation method. In this method, starch moleculeswere separated on the column based on their molecular weight. Theseparated fractions were then assayed using the Starch Assay Kit (Sigma)according to the suppliers instructions.

Approximately 10 mg of starch was dissolved in 3.0 ml of 1N NaOH(de-gassed) by incubation at 37° C. for 30 min. The starch solution wascentrifuged for 15 min to spin down the undissolved components. Thesupernatant was loaded on to a Sepharose CL2B column at a pump speed of1 ml/min. The column was run using 10 mM NaOH as buffer and fiftyfractions of 2.5 ml each were collected. The pH of fractions 9 to 50 wasadjusted to 4.5 with 35 μl of 1 M HCl. An aliquot (250 μl) of eachsample was transferred into a tube followed by the addition of 250 μl ofStarch reagent (Starch assay kit, Sigma). The controls included: astarch assay reagent blank containing only starch reagent (250 μl) andwater (250 μl), a glucose assay reagent blank containing only 500 μlwater, a sample blank containing only 250 μl starch sample and 250 μlwater and a sample test containing only 250 μl starch reagent and 250 μlstarch sample. The samples and the controls were incubated at 60° C. for60 min, and then 200 μl of each transferred to a new tube followed byaddition of 1 ml of glucose reagent (starch assay kit, Sigma) andincubation at 37° C. for 30 min. The absorbance at 340 nm was used todetermine the quantity of starch (mg) in each fraction according to theinstructions supplied with the kit.

The chromatogram of starch samples revealed two peaks eluted from theSepharose column. The amylose content (second peak) of each sample wascalculated as a percentage of the total amount of starch within both ofthe peaks.

Using this method, the amylose content of the ds-SBEIIa transgenic lineAcc. 144087, which was shown to be homozygous for the transgene, wascalculated to be 78% and that of a ds-SBEIIb transgenic line Acc 144008(homozygous transgenic line from the event IIb 110.16b) was estimated tobe 23%. In comparison, the iodometric method gave amylose contents forthese lines of 88.47% and 27.29%, respectively.

Functional properties such as gelatinization temperature, pasteviscosity and starch swelling volume are analysed by DifferentialScanning calorimetry (DSC), Rapid Visco Analyser (RVA) and starchswelling power test, respectively. The structure of these starches isanalysed by X-ray crystallography and particle size analysis.

TABLE 5 Amylose content of wheat transgenic lines estimated byiodometric method Amylose content Line Target enzyme Event No. (%) NB1Non transformed — 31.8 144008 SBE IIb IIb 110.16b 27.3 144087 SBE IIaIIa 85.3a 88.5 144025 SBE IIa IIa 50.1b 75.8 LSD — — 7.7

Example 9 Chain Length Distribution Analysis

The chain length distribution of starch samples was determined byfluorophore assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis (FACE) afterisoamylase de-branching of the starch. The percentages of chain lengthsfrom DP 6-11, DP 12-30 and DP 31-60 in starch from the transgenic seedcompared to non-transgenic controls are presented in Table 6.

TABLE 6 Chain length distribution of isoamylase debranched starches fromwheat transgenic lines. Targeted DP4- DP13- DP24- Line gene Event No 1224 36 >36 NB1 Nontrans- — 57.39 37.38 3.83 1.40 formed control 144087SBEIIa IIa 85.3a 47.40 42.27 6.16 4.17 144025 SBEIIa IIa 50.1b 49.9944.40 5.60 — 144008 SBEIIb IIb 110.16b 57.98 37.65 4.37 —

There was a significantly lower proportion of chain lengths of DP 4-12in starch from ds-SBEIIa transgenic seed compared to starch fromuntransformed seed or ds-SBEIIb transgenic seed. The proportion of chainlengths of >DP 13 was higher in ds-SBEIIa transgenic seed compared tothe others. These results suggest the possibility that SBEIIa isselectively involved in the synthesis of shorter chains of DP 4-12 inwheat starch. In starch from the SSIIa mutant, however, there was anincrease in the proportion of shorter chain lengths in the amylose.

Example 10 Properties of Starch from SBEIIa-Modified Wheat

Physical properties of starch from ds-SBEIIa and ds-SBEIIb transgeniclines including the gelatinisation temperature were analysed using aPerkin Elmer Diamond differential scanning calorimeter. Approximately 20mg of each starch was mixed with water at a ratio of 1:2 i.e. to amoisture content of 66.7%, and sealed in a DSC pan. A heating rate of10° C. per minute was used to heat the test and reference samples from 0to 150° C. Data were analysed using the software available with theinstrument.

Two endotherm peaks were observed in the thermogram DSC trace for eachstarch. The first peak represented the breakdown of crystallinestructure during gelatinization of starch. The second peak representedthe amylose-lipid dissociation endotherm. The gelatinization peaktemperature of starch from ds-SBEIIa transgenic lines showed an increaseof approximately 7-10° C. compared to the peak temperature for anon-transformed control starch, and approximately 3 to 7° C. increasedcompared to starch from a ds-SBEIIb transgenic line.

TABLE 7 Thermal properties of transgenic wheat starch measured bydifferential scanning calorimeter (DSC). Peak 2 Peak 1(Gelatinisation)(Amylose-lipid dissociation) Lines Enzyme targeted Onset Peak End AreaΔH Onset Peak End ΔH 008 SBE IIb 58.8 63.7 70.8 234.8 4.5 93.2 103.5110.3 0.7 012 SBE IIb 59.0 64.1 70.8 262.6 4.3 94.5 103.1 109.7 0.6 121SBE IIa 53.7 67.5 86.9 156.4 2.6 92.4 102.9 108.9 0.7 087 SBE IIa 53.171.9 85.9 142.6 2.4 95.7 102.7 108.9 0.7 114 SBE IIa 53.0 68.1 88.0125.2 2.1 92.8 102.5 109.6 0.8  109c Control* 55.9 60.7 68.8 234.3 3.997.2 104.6 109.9 0.4

A marked increase in the end temperature of gelatinization (first peak)of approximately 16-19° C. was observed in these lines compared to bothnon-transformed control and ds-SBEIIb transgenic lines. The temperatureof onset of gelatinization appeared to be earlier in ds-SBEIIatransgenic lines than the control or ds-SBEIIb transgenic lines. Ng etal., 1997 reported a gelatinization onset temperature of amylaseextender (ae) maize starch similar to that of normal maize starch, but asignificant increase in the peak gelatinization temperature in ae starchcompared to normal starch. The gelatinization enthalpy of starch fromds-SBEIIa transgenic lines was significantly lower than that of both thecontrol and ds-SBEIIb lines. This seems to be reflecting thesignificantly lower gelatinization peak area which represents thereduced amount of amylopectin in ds-SBEIIa transgenic lines. Nosignificant alteration was observed in the amylose-lipid dissociationpeak in any of the transgenic lines. We have therefore obtained starchwith this novel set of properties.

The wheat high amylose starches as described above had structural andfunctional properties that were similar, but not identical, to highamylose maize starch. Two key differences were noted. Firstly, theincrease in peak gelatinisation temperature for high amylose wheat wasnot as large as the difference observed previously for maize amyloseextender starch compared to standard maize. Secondly, there was areduction in starch content of approximately 30% in amylose extendermaize lines (Singletary et al., 1997), however, a suppression of starchcontent of only 9% was observed for high amylose wheat. Additionalincreases in amylose content in wheat may be obtained by transferringthe hp-SBEIIa and hp-SBEIIb constructs into a SBEI-null background.

Example 11 Animal Trial

Care of Animals.

Young adult, male Sprague Dawley rats were used. They were purchasedfrom the University of Adelaide Animal Resource Facility and housed ingroups in standard wire-bottomed cages at the Animal Services Unit ofCSIRO Health Sciences and Nutrition in a room of controlled temperature(22±1° C.) and lighting (lights on at 0800-2000 h).

Diets and Feeding

After arrival the rats were adapted to a nonpurified commercial diet for7 days. They were then weighed and allocated randomly to two dietarytreatment groups of six rats each, of equal mean live weight, andtransferred to a purified diet. The composition of the basal diet, whichwas based on AIN 93G (American Institute of Nutrition, 1993)specifications and prepared from standard ingredients, is shown in Table8. The diets were balanced for macronutrients and comprised 200 g ofprotein/kg, 550 g of carbohydrate/kg (as 450 g of starch and 100 g ofsucrose), 70 g of fat/kg and 90 g of non-starch polysaccharide (NSP) perkg. Processed wheat bran, safflower oil and casein were used to obtainthe desired macronutrient profile. Low amylose maize starch was used toensure uniform starch content (45 g/100 g) for the two diets. Thehigh-amylose wheat diet contained 576 g/kg of the novel (high amylose)wheat as wholemeal flour. Other treatment diets contained between 32%and 48% of the respective wholemeal flour (low-amylose wheat) or starch(low amylose or high amylose maize). Diets may be prepared by blendingthe various ingredients with a small quantity of water using a planetarymixer. The mixture may then be pelleted (for example to a diameter of 8mm and a length of 1-2 cm) by extrusion, dried for 16 h at 40° C., andplaced in sealed containers and stored at 4° C. Alternatively, ascarried out in this experiment, diets were prepared as a powder andfreely available, as was drinking water.

TABLE 8 Formulation of the low and high amylose wheat diets Low amyloseHigh amylose wheat wheat Ingredient (g/kg of diet) Casein 113 72 Sucrose116 120 Safflower oil 44 38 Wheat bran 121 65 Low amylose wheat flour481 High amylose wheat flour 576 Maize starch* 83 86 Vitamin premix 8 9Mineral premix 29 30 Choline 2 2 L-Cysteine 2 2 *Conventional(low-amylose) starch (3401C) (Penford Australia Pty Ltd, Lane Cove NSW).^(†)Pharmamix P169 (Propharma Australia Pty Ltd, Dandenong, Victoria)which contained, per kg mix, 1.5 g retinyl acetate, 25 mgcholecalciferol, 20 g α-tocopherol, 2 g riboflavin, 7.5 mgcyanocobalamin, 5.6 g Ca pantothenate, 50 mg biotin, 10 g nicotinamide,1 g menadione, 50 g FeSO₄•7H₂O, 10 g MnO₂, 50 g ZnO, 5 g CuSO₄•7H₂O,0.25 g CoSO₄, 0.5 g KI, 0.1 g Na₂SeO₄, and 31 g antioxidant (Oxicap E2;Novus Nutrition, Melbourne Australia).

Rats had unrestricted access to treatment diets and drinking water for13 days. During the last 9 days, the animals were kept in individualmetabolism cages to allow accurate estimation of feed and water intakeand total collection of faeces which were retained for analysis. Ratswere observed daily and weighed weekly. Diet consumption of rats whenhoused individually in metabolism cages was recorded daily, as was theweight of faeces.

Feed Intake and Body Weight Gain

Initial body weight did not differ between the groups (overall mean of193 g; n=12, pooled SE=3). Diets were well accepted and supported ratesof food consumption and weight gain (average 6.5 g/d) that wereappropriate for rats of this age. There was no effect of dietarytreatment on final body weight with a mean of 278 g (SE=7, n=6) and 282g (SE=6, n=6) for the low and high amylose wheat, respectively. Dailyfood intake averaged 20 g/d for each of the two groups (P>0.05) duringthe metabolism cage phase of the study.

Large Bowel Tissue and Digesta Weights

Rats were anaesthetised with halothane, the abdominal cavity opened andthe caecal and colonic contents collected, weighed and stored at −20° C.until analysis. The moisture content of caecal digesta was determined byfreeze-drying a portion to constant weight, and weighing the portionbefore and after drying. Data below from the trial are shown as themean±standard error (SE) for 6 observations per group. They wereanalysed by t-test and a value of P<0.05 was taken as the criterion ofsignificance.

Large bowel tissue weight was generally greater in rats fed the highamylose wheat but only in the caecum did the effect near significance(P<0.07). In that viscus, the weights were 0.92 g (SE=0.18, n=6) and1.23 g (SE=0.39, n=6), for the low and high amylose wheats respectively.Thus, the high amylose diet tended to increase tissue mass. The averagewet weight of digesta was higher in rats fed the new wheat, tending tobe greater in each large intestinal compartment, but the effect wasstatistically significant only in the caecum where it was more than2.1-fold higher than in rats fed the low amylose wheat diet (Table 9).Not only did the consumption of the high amylose diet usually result inwetter luminal contents, the dry weight of digesta was still alsoconsiderably greater for the high amylose treatment.

TABLE 9 Large bowel digesta weight (g) of rats consuming low or highamylose wheat diets Colon Diet Caecum Proximal Distal Low amylose wheat1.47 (0.12)^(a) 0.29 (0.12) 0.83 (0.17) High amylose wheat 3.14(0.34)^(a) 0.48 (0.09) 1.10 (0.08) All values are the mean and standarderror (in parentheses) for six animals. Values in a column with likesuperscript letters are significantly different: ^(a)P < 0.01.

Large Bowel SCFA and pH

Digesta and faecal samples were diluted with a specified volume ofinternal standard (heptanoic acid) for analysis of SCFA and mixedthoroughly for determination of pH using a standard glass electrode. Theslurries were then stored frozen to await further analyses. For analysisof total and major individual SCFA, slurries were thawed, centrifugedand concentrated by low temperature vacuum microdistillation forquantification by gas-liquid chromatography (GLC).

Data for the caecum are shown in Tables 10 and 11. The high amylosewheat produced a lower pH value in caecal contents (Table 10). Whilethere were no significant differences in the concentrations of eithertotal or individual short-chain fatty acids (SCFA, Table 10), caecaldigesta pools for the total and individual acids were all significantlyhigher in rats fed the high amylose wheat diet than in controls (Table11). Faecal total SCFA excretion was also significantly higher (P<0.02)in rats fed the high amylose wheat with a mean value of 46.1 (SE=5)μmol/d compared with 24.7 (SE=5) μmol/d by rats fed the standard wheat.

TABLE 10 Caecal digesta pH and short chain fatty acid concentrations ofrats consuming low and high amylose wheat diets Short chain fatty acidconcentration (mmol/Kg) Diet pH Acetate Propionate Butyrate Total Low6.23 (0.05)^(a) 38.6 (1.9) 11.9 (1.7) 25.8 (3.3) 79.6 (3.1) amylosewheat High 5.90 (0.14)^(a) 43.6 (7.8) 15.8 (3.1) 23.0 (2.5) 84.1 (8.6)amylose wheat All values are the mean and SE (in parentheses) for sixanimals. Values in any column with like superscript letters aresignificantly different: ^(a)P < 0.05.

TABLE 11 Caecal short chain fatty acid pools of rats consuming low andhigh amylose wheat diets Short chain fatty acid pools (μmol) DietAcetate Propionate Butyrate Total Low amylose wheat 44 (4)^(c) 14(2)^(b) 31 (6)^(a)  88 (10)^(c) High amylose wheat 106 (18)^(c) 38(7)^(b) 57 (8)^(a) 202 (25)^(c) All values are the mean and SE (inparentheses) for six animals. Values in any column with like superscriptletters are significantly different: ^(a)P < 0.05; ^(b)P < 0.02; ^(c)P <0.01.

This experiment showed that modified wheat containing high amylosestarch induced positive changes in the gastrointestinal tract of amammalian animal. These changes were consistent with, and could beexplained by, the presence of increased levels of resistant starch (RS)in the modified wheat. A key outcome was to confirm that the increasedlevel of amylose translated to desired physiological attributes.Therefore, the modified wheat has the potential to deliver significanthealth benefits to large numbers of consumers through their diet.

It was observed that food intakes and body weight gain did not differbetween the low and high-amylose wheat treatment groups and there was noevidence for any adverse impact on the growth and performance of theanimals fed the transgenic high amylose wheat. This was in contrast to aprevious report in rats fed a transgenic raw potato starch containing aknown toxin, the lectin Galanthus nivalis agglutinin (GNA) where a lossof body weight occurred (Ewen and Pusztai, 1999).

Limitations in the quantities of grain meant that the trial describedabove had to be carried out in rats for a relatively short period oftime. Nevertheless, the data show conclusively that indices of largebowel fermentation were all significantly higher in rats fed the highamylose wheat compared with those fed the standard wheat, consistentwith an elevated level of RS. Thus large bowel digesta wet weight andSCFA pools and faecal SCFA excretion were all approximately 100% largerin rats fed the modified wheat compared with those fed the control diet.pH values were also significantly lower, again consistent with greaterfermentation. That these differences were due to starch, and not NSP,was ensured by balancing the fibre content of the diets. This is of someinterest in view of the apparent importance of butyrate in promotinglarge bowel function Collectively the data support the potential of thehigh amylose wheat to produce foods high in RS and with a low GI. Thedata demonstrate the health potential of high amylose wheats, especiallyin processed foods, as an important additional mechanism to deliversignificant health benefits to large numbers of consumers through theirdiet.

Example 12 Production of Breads

One of the most effective ways of delivering a grain such as highamylose wheat into the diet is through bread. To show that the highamylose wheat could readily be incorporated into breads and to examinethe factors that allowed retention of bread making quality, samples offlour were produced, analysed and used in baking. Initially, only smallquantities of the high amylose grain were available and therefore doughmixing and baking were carried out on a small scale (10-15 g). Suchmethods can readily be scaled up to commercial level when sufficientgrain is available.

Methods:

Wheat grains were conditioned to 16.5% moisture content overnight andmilled with either a Buhler laboratory scale mill at BRI Ltd, Australia,or using a Quadromat Junior mill followed by sieving, to achieve a finalparticle size of 150 μm. The protein and moisture content of the sampleswas determined by infrared reflectance (NIR) according to AACC Method39-11 (1999), or by the Dumas method and air-oven according to AACCMethod 44-15A (AACC, 1999).

Micro Z-Arm Miring

Optimum water absorption values of wheat flours were determined with theMicro Z-arm Mixer, using 4 g of test flour per mix (Gras et al 2001;Bekes et al 2002). Constant angular velocity (with shaft speeds for thefast and slow blades of 96 and 64 rpm, respectively) was used during allmixes. Mixing was carried out in triplicate, each for 20 minutes. Beforeadding water to the flour, the baseline was automatically recorded (30sec) by mixing only the solid components. The water addition was carriedout in one step using an automatic water pump. The following parameterswere determined from the individual mixing experiments by taking theaverages: WA %—Water Absorption was determined at 500 Brabender Unit(BU) dough consistency; Dough Development Time (DDT): time to peakresistance (sec).

Mixograms

To determine optimal dough mixing parameters with the modified wheatflour, samples with variable water absorption corresponding to waterabsorption determined by the Micro Z-arm mixer, were mixed in a 10 gCSIRO prototype Mixograph keeping the total dough mass constant. Foreach of the flour samples, the following parameters were recorded:MT—mixing time (sec); PR—Mixograph peak resistance (Arbitrary Units,AU); BWPR—band width at peak resistance (Arbitrary Units, AU);RBD—resistance breakdown (%); BWBD—bandwidth breakdown (%); TMBW—time tomaximum bandwidth (s); and MBW—maximum bandwidth (Arbitrary Units, AU.).

Micro Extension Resting

Dough extensibility parameters may be measured as follows: Doughs may bemixed to peak dough development in a 10 g prototype Mixograph. Extensiontests at 1 cm/s may be carried out on a TA.XT2i texture analyser with amodified geometry Kieffer dough & gluten extensibility rig (Mann et al2003). Dough samples for extension testing (˜1.0 g/test) may be mouldedwith a Kieffer moulder and rested at 30° C. and 90% RH for 45 min.before extension testing. The R_Max and Ext_Rmax may be determined fromthe data with the help of Exceed Expert software (Smewing, 1995: Mann,2002).

The recipe used, based on the 14 g flour as 100% was as follows: flour100%, salt 2%, dry yeast 1.5%, vegetable oil 2%, and improver (ascorbicacid 100 ppm, fungal amylase 15 ppm, xylanase 40 ppm, soy flour 0.3%,obtained from Goodman Fielder Pty Ltd, Australia) 1.5%. The wateraddition level was based on the micro Z-arm water absorption values thatwere adjusted for the full formula. Flour (14 g) and the otheringredients were mixed to peak dough development time in a 35 gMixograph. The moulding and panning were carried out in a two stagedproofing steps at 40° C. at 85% RH. Baking was carried out in a Roteloven for 15 min at 190° C. Loaf volume (determined by the seed (canola)displacement method) and weight measurements were taken after cooling ona rack for 2 hours. Net water loss was measured by weighing the loavesover time.

The flour or wholemeal may be blended with flour or wholemeal fromnon-modified wheats or other cereals such as barley to provide desireddough and bread-making or nutritional qualities. For example, flour fromcvs Chara or Glenlea has a high dough strength while that from cv Janzhas a medium dough strength. In particular, the levels of high and lowmolecular weight glutenin subunits in the flour is positively correlatedwith dough strength, and further influenced by the nature of the allelespresent. In this example, the high amylose wheat flour was blended withflour from the control untransformed line, NB1.

Results.

The water absorption characteristics of the flours obtained frommodified wheats were measured (FIG. 4). Blending of the high amyloseflour with varying ratios of control flour showed that the high amylosewheat flour had higher water absorbance than the control flour, and thiswas positively correlated with the level of amylose in the starch—asseen by comparing 50.3x/6/(60.1% amylose) and 85.2c (81.0% amylose).This result may reflect the influence of the altered starch granule sizeand shape on water absorption characteristics, however, it is alsoprobable that other changes in the high amylose grain such as alterednon-starch polysaccharide content may affect water absorption.

The specific volumes for admixtures of high amylose and control flours,mixed in ratios from 0:100 to 100:0 was also determined, and the dataare shown in FIG. 5. This result shows that the addition of high amylosewheat tended to reduce loaf volume. However, breads containing up to 50%high amylose wheat flour had very acceptable loaf volumes and could beused in standard white bread applications. Breads containing >50% highamylose wheat flour produced loaves have reduced loaf volumes and weresuited for heavier style breads such as wholemeal or mixed grain breads.It was thought that further manipulation of improvers, gluten addition,and/or alteration to the genetic background of the wheat variety waslikely ameliorate the observed reduction in loaf volume.

The optimal mixing time of doughs made from mixtures of high amylose andcontrol wheat flour was measured (FIG. 6) and showed that mixing timeswere within a range considered acceptable for commercial bakeryapplications.

These studies showed that breads with commercial potential, includingacceptable crumb structure, texture and appearance, were obtained usingthe high amylose wheat flour samples. Furthermore, high amylose wheatsmay be used in combination with preferred genetic backgroundcharacteristics (e.g. preferred high and low molecular weightglutenins), the addition of improvers such as gluten, ascorbate oremulsifiers, or the use of differing bread-making styles (e.g. spongeand dough bread-making, sour dough, mixed grain, or wholemeal) toprovide a range of products with particular utility and nutritionalefficacy for improved bowel and metabolic health.

Example 13 In Vitro Measurements of Glycemic Index (GI) and ResistantStarch (RS) of Food samples

The Glycemic Index (GI) of food samples including the bread made asdescribed in Example 12 was measured in vitro as follows:

The food sample was homogenised thoroughly with a Zyliss blender. Anamount of sample representing approximately 50 mg of carbohydrate wasweighed into a 120 ml plastic sample container and 100 μl of carbonatebuffer added without α-amylase. Approximately 15-20 seconds after theaddition of carbonate buffer, 5 ml of Pepsin solution (65 mg of pepsin(Sigma) dissolved in 65 ml of HCl 0.02M, pH 2.0, made up on the day ofuse) was added, and the mixture incubated at 37° C. for 30 minutes in areciprocating water bath at 70 rpm. Following incubation, the sample wasneutralised with 5 ml of NaOH (0.02M) and 25 ml of acetate buffer 0.2M,pH 6 added. 5 ml of enzyme mixture containing 2 mg/mL of pancreatin(α-amylase, Sigma) and 28 U/mL of amyloglucosidase from Aspergillusniger (AMG, Sigma) dissolved in Na acetate buffer (sodium acetatebuffer, 0.2 M, pH 6.0, containing 0.20 M calcium chloride and 0.49 mMmagnesium chloride) was then added, and the mixture incubated for 2-5minutes. 1 ml of solution was transferred from each flask into a 1.5 mltube and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes. The supernatant wastransferred to a new tube and stored in a freezer. The remainder of eachsample was covered with aluminium foil and the containers incubated at37° C. for 5 hours in a water bath. A further 1 ml of solution was thencollected from each flask, centrifuged and the supernatant transferredas carried out previously. This was also stored in a freezer until theabsorbances could be read.

All samples were thawed to room temperature and centrifuged at 3000 rpmfor 10 minutes. Samples were diluted as necessary (1 in 10 dilutionusually sufficient), 10 ul of supernatant transferred from each sampleto 96-well microtitre plates in duplicate or triplicate. A standardcurve for each microtitre plate was prepared using glucose (0 mg, 0.0625mg, 0.125 mg, 0.25 mg, 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg). 200 ul of Glucose Trinderreagent (Thermotrace, Noble Park, Victoria) was added to each well andthe plates incubated at room temperature for approximately 20 minutes.The absorbance of each sample was measured at 505 nm using a platereader and the amount of glucose calculated with reference to thestandard curve.

The level of Resistant Starch (RS) in food samples including the breadmade as described in Example 12 was measured in vitro as follows. Thismethod describes the sample preparation and in vitro digestion of starchin foods, as normally eaten. The method has two sections: firstly,starch in the food was hydrolysed under simulated physiologicalconditions; secondly, by-products were removed through washing and theresidual starch determined after homogenization and drying of thesample. Starch quantitated at the end of the digestion treatmentrepresented the resistant starch content of the food.

On day 1, the food samples were processed in a manner simulatingconsumption, for example by homogenising with a kitchen chopper to aconsistency as would be achieved by chewing. After homogenising, anamount of food representing up to 500 mg of carbohydrate was weighedinto a 125 mL Erlenmeyer flask. A carbonate buffer was prepared bydissolving 121 mg of NaHCO₃ and 157 mg of KCl in approximately 90 mLpurified water, adding 159 μL of 1 M CaCl₂.6H₂O solution and 41 μL of0.49 M MgCl₂.6H₂O, adjusting the pH to 7 to 7.1 with 0.32 M HCl, andadjusting the volume to 100 mL. This buffer was stored at 4° C. for upto five days. An artificial saliva solution containing 250 units ofα-amylase (Sigma A-3176 Type VI-B from porcine pancreas) per mL of thecarbonate buffer was prepared. An amount of the artificial salivasolution, approximately equal to the weight of food, was added to theflask. About 15-20 sec after adding the saliva, 5 mL of pepsin solutionin HCl (1 mg/mL pepsin (Sigma) in 0.02 M HCl, pH 2.0, made up on day ofuse) was added to each flask. The mixing of the amylase and then pepsinmimicked a human chewing the food before swallowing it. The mixture wasincubated at 37° C. for 30 min with shaking at 85 rpm. The mixture wasthen neutralised with 5 mL of 0.02M NaOH. 25 mL of acetate buffer (0.2M, pH 6) and 5 mL of pancreatin enzyme mixture containing 2 mg/mLpancreatin (Sigma, porcine pancreas at 4×USP activity) and 28U ofamyloglucosidase (AMG, Sigma) from Aspergillus niger in acetate buffer,pH6, were added per flask. Each flask was capped with aluminium foil andincubated at 37° C. for 16 hours in a reciprocating water bath set to 85rpm.

On day 2, the contents of each flask was transferred quantitatively to a50 mL polypropylene tube and centrifuged at 2000×g for 10 min at roomtemperature. The supernatants were discarded and each pellet washedthree times with 20 mL of water, gently vortexing the tube with eachwash to break up the pellet, followed by centrifugation. 50 uL of thelast water wash was tested with Glucose Trinder reagent for the absenceof free glucose. Each pellet was then resuspended in approximately 6 mLof purified water and homogenised three times for 10 seconds using anUltra Turrax TP18/10 with an S25N-8G dispersing tool. The contents werequantitatively transferred to a 25 mL volumetric flask and made tovolume. The contents were mixed thoroughly and returned to thepolypropylene tube. A 5 mL sample of each suspension was transferred toa 25 mL culture tube and immediately shell frozen in liquid nitrogen andfreeze dried.

On day 3, total starch in each sample was measured using reagentssupplied in the Megazyme Total Starch Procedure kit. Starch standards(Regular Maize Starch, Sigma S-5296) and an assay reagent blank wereprepared. Samples, controls and reagent blanks were wet with 0.4 mL of80% ethanol to aid dispersion, followed by vortexing. Immediately, 2 mLof DMSO was added and solutions mixed by vortexing. The tubes wereplaced in a boiling water bath for 5 min, and 3 mL of thermostableα-amylase (100 U/ml) in MOPS buffer (pH 7, containing 5 mM CaCl₂ and0.02% sodium azide added immediately. Solutions were incubated in theboiling water bath for a further 12 min, with vortex mixing at 3 minintervals. Tubes were then placed in a 50° C. water bath and 4 mL ofsodium acetate buffer (200 mM, pH 4.5, containing 0.02% sodium azide)and 0.1 mL of amyloglucosidase at 300 U/ml added. The mixtures wereincubated at 50° C. for 30 min with gentle mixing at 10 min intervals.The volumes were made up to 25 mL in a volumetric flask and mixed well.Aliquots were centrifuged at 2000×g for 10 min. The amount of glucose in50 μL of supernatant was determined with 1.0 mL of Glucose Trinderreagent and measuring the absorbance at 505 nm after incubation of thetubes at room temperature in the dark for a minimum of 18 min and amaximum of 45 min.

Results

The GI and RS content of breads made with the high amylose wheat flour(>30% amylose (w/w)) were determined. As controls, breads were also madefrom wheat lines obtained from a cross between varieties Sunco and anSGP-1 triple null mutant (Yamamori et al.). Doubled-haploid plants wereobtained from progeny of the cross and grown to provide a population ofhomozygous lines segregating for the three SGP-1 mutant alleles. Thepresence of mutant alleles in each line was determined by gene specific(SSIIa gene) PCR reactions on isolated DNA from each line. Thus, thecontribution of each of the null alleleles for the SSIIa gene on the A,B and D genomes could be assessed, singly and in each of the possiblecombinations. Grain from each of the lines was used for bread productionby the small-scale method as described above. The results of the invitro GI and RS measurements are shown in FIGS. 7 and 8.

The GI and RS were also measured for breads made from the high amylosewheat flour blended with control, low amylose flour, using 0%, 10%, 20%,30%, 50%, 75% or 100% high amylose flour. The data are also presented inFIGS. 7 and 8. The levels of RS increased linearly with increasingamylose content, as the proportion of flour from the high amylose wheatincreased. Breads made from flour comprising entirely transgenic highamylose wheat exhibited very high resistant starch levels, withtransgenic line 85.2c having substantially higher levels of RS than line50.3 (6.2 vs 4.5 g RS/100 g bread, respectively). Therefore, replacementof flour from control (low amylose) wheat with the high amylose wheatfor production of the bread correlated positively with increased RS.

The levels of RS made with high amylose wheat starch were much higherthan in commercially available bread (Wonderwhite) containing highamylose corn starch (“Hi-Maize”) used at 10% in the formulation, whichhad <1% RS. Furthermore, the maximum level of corn starch that can beincorporated in bread without affecting its quality is limited to about10-12%. Therefore, the use of high amylose wheat in the production ofbreads provided significant advantages including the level of RS thatcould be achieved.

The rate of in vitro starch hydrolysis was reduced for the bread madewith the modified wheat compared to the bread made with the wild-typewheat. The GI decreased only slightly while the percentage of highamylose wheat flour increased to 30%, but then decreased more rapidly asa greater proportion of high amylose flour was added. The greatestadvantage in lowering the GI was seen for food made with at least 50%high amylose wheat flour. Breads made using the higher amylose line85.2c had a slightly lower GI as measured in vitro than the bread madewith line 50.3.

Discussion

The in vitro assays were useful in estimating the quantity of starch ina food product that would be digested or not digested in the smallintestine. They yielded values that are thought to accurately andreliably predict the in vivo GI and RS content of foods. Importantly,foods were analysed ‘as consumed’ which is important considering thatfood processing methods may have a deleterious lowering effect on thelevel of RS. In the case of the modified wheat breads, the resultsdemonstrated that physiological functionality (in particular high RS andlow GI) had not been destroyed during cooking or storage, and presumablywould be present at the point of consumption.

Most processed starchy foods contain very little RS. The breads madeusing wild-type wheat flour and a conventional formulation and bakingprocess contained <1% RS. In comparison, breads baked using the sameprocess and storage conditions but containing the modified high amylosewheats had levels of RS as much as 10-fold higher. Legumes, which areone of the few rich sources of RS in the human diet, contain levels ofRS that are normally <5%. Therefore, consumption of the high amylosewheat bread in amounts normally consumed by adults (e.g. 200 g/d) wouldreadily supply at least 5-12 g of RS. Thus, incorporation of the highamylose wheat into food products has the potential to make aconsiderable contribution to dietary RS intakes of developed nations,where average daily intakes of RS are estimated to be only about 5 g.

Starch that is resistant to small intestinal digestion enters the largebowel where, largely through its interaction with the microflora, it hasa favourable influence on colonic physiology and function.

The rate at which starch is hydrolysed and absorbed in the smallintestine determines to a large extent its metabolic properties. The GIranks foods according to their postprandial glycemic response. Starchyfoods that are rapidly digested (high GI) have adverse healthconsequences, including increased risk of diabetes, obesity and possiblycertain cancers. Breads made from the modified wheat flours (transgenic)were shown to have a low GI (<55), particularly when the proportion ofmodified wheat flour comprised at least 50% of the flour component inthe bread formulation. It was possible that components of the modifiedgrains other than starch, such as for example non-starch polysaccharide(NSP) also contributed to the decrease in starch digestibility asmeasured in vitro. The data suggested that these products made from thealtered wheats have potential to reduce the risk of chronic diseases andmay be especially helpful in preventing or controlling type-II diabetesby slowing the postprandial rise in blood glucose.

Furthermore, because the starch present in the modified wheats wasdigested more slowly and less extensively, foods made from these novelwheats had a reduced energy density and may promote satiety.Accordingly, they may be effective in the prevention and management ofobesity. They may have applications in the treatment or control ofcertain diseases and medical conditions e.g. enteral formulations topromote bowel health and function, nutritional products for assistingwith blood glucose control in type-I diabetics or those at risk fromthis disease.

Example 14 Treatment or Prevention of Medical Conditions

Dysglucaemia

In addition to improving bowel health, the invention provides methodsand compositions which are thought to be suitable for the promotion ofeuglycaemia and the treatment, prevention or reduced risk of disorderedblood glucose regulation. This is based on the observed reduction in thepotential glycemic index of foods incorporating the altered wheatstarch. This may be useful in both healthy subjects such as athletes andin compromised individuals such as patients undergoing surgery orchemotherapy. In particular, it may be of great use in diabetic patientsseeking to maintain optimal blood glucose levels during the day ornight. Blood glucose levels in individuals may be disturbed or alteredby exercise, pharmaceutical or surgical therapy, by disease or asyndrome involving multiple diseases or metabolic disorders. Examplesinclude athletes, patients weakened by chemotherapy, fasting patientsand patients suffering from disease or disorders disturbing or alteringglucose metabolism, or patients undergoing treatment of such and otherdiseases or disorders. Further examples include animals other thanhumans such as, for example, pets, livestock or racehorses.

The methods or compositions may be used for improved glycaemic control,that is, for stabilising the blood sugar levels and alleviating theoscillation between unhealthy high and low blood sugar levels. Lack ofglycaemic control is associated inter alia with microvascular damagesuch as occurs in diabetic retinopathy, diabetic ketoacidoses or socalled diabetic coma.

A current method of treatment is to use uncooked cornstarch whichprovides a level of resistant starch. However, it is difficult toprepare compositions of uncooked cornstarch having an agreeable tasteand texture, suitable for long-term daily consumption and thereforecompliance is affected. Thus, there are advantages in treating diabetichypoglycaemia by administering the altered wheat starch as describedherein, containing resistant starch, as a slow release carbohydratesource for maintenance of acceptable levels of blood glucose in diabeticpatients during the night, or at other times when intake of food atshort intervals is not possible.

Thus the starch might be administered in a composition that is solublein the small intestine. Suitable substances included in the compositionwith the altered wheat starch include polymers such as gum arabica,potassium alginate, guar gum, methyl cellulose, ethyl cellulose, liquidoils, liquid and hard fats and waxes such as paraffin, hydrogenatedcottonseed oil, beeswax and carnauba wax.

Uremia

In kidney failure there is a decrease in the glomerular filtration rateand the kidneys are unable to maintain homeostasis of the blood.Retention of water causes oedema and the concentration of hydrogen ionsmay increase, acidosis may develop, nitrogenous wastes may accumulateand a condition referred to as uremia may develop in the blood andtissues. Examples of uremic toxins include ammonia, urea, creatinine,phenols, indoles, as well as larger molecules. The concentration ofserum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), uric acid, and guanidinocompounds such as N-methyl guanidine (NMG) and guanidino succinic acid(GSA) are significantly altered.

Nitrogenous wastes such as urea, creatinine and uric acid, along withseveral other small and medium molecular weight compounds, flow into thesmall intestine and a number of attempts of treatment have been based onthe use of the bowel as a substitute for kidney function. A number ofabsorptive compounds have been used for this purpose, as have locus beangum. It is also thought that by increasing the fecal bulk and theproduction of SCFA that a beneficial effect can result. Short chainfatty acids acidify the intestinal content and via osmotic mechanismdraw water into the intestinal lumen, providing a laxative effect,prevent overgrowth and facilitate ammonia and other waste nitrogenelemination. They also result in the growth of the fecal biomass, and indoing so, entrap urea and ammonia for bacterial protein synthesis orconversion to the ammonium ion. Through stimulation of bacterial growthand fermentation, prebiotic compounds such as high amylose starches alsoaffect bowel habit and are mildly laxative.

Thus the invention provides altered wheat starch which may be used as alow cost supplement or treatment for renal insufficiency, liverinsufficiency, inborn errors of urea metabolism or gastrointestinaldisorders or diseases. A ready measure of the effect provided by thealtered wheat starch can be determined by ascertaining the levels ofserum creatinine.

Example 15 Determination of the Glycemic Index of Foods Made fromModified Wheat

The in vitro digestion and animal feeding trials indicated that foodmade with the modified wheat starch released glucose relatively slowlyduring digestion. To establish whether this would also be the case inhumans, a feeding trial will be carried out in volunteers to measure theGI of the food and compare it to corresponding food made with wildtypestarch. The GI ranks carbohydrate-containing human foods on aweight-for-weight basis according to their postprandial glycemicresponse. It has considerable clinical and practical utility which iswell recognized worldwide. The particular aim of the study is todetermine the glycemic index (GI) of two common bakery foods, a breadand muffin, made using modified wholemeal flour. The study will assessthe extent to which the modified foods raise blood glucose in volunteersrelative to that of a reference carbohydrate and compare this with theGI values for the same type of bakery foods manufactured using standardwheat flour.

A standard wheat and the high amylose wheat will be milled and theresultant wholemeal flour baked into bread and muffins. All foods willbe manufactured to industry standards by a commercial manufacturer. Theamount of available carbohydrate in representative samples will bedetermined. The usual method for determining the amount of carbohydratein foods is ‘by difference’, i.e. by subtracting the sum of theremaining components (protein, fat, water, ash and fiber) from 100.However, this approach is inherently less reliable than that obtained bydirect analysis. Accordingly, we will determine the proximatecomposition of the test foods using accepted (AOAC) analyticaltechniques in order to calculate the available carbohydrate of our testfoods.

Fourteen subjects will be recruited. GI is calculated using a datasetcontaining no less than 10 subjects and therefore commencing the trialwith an additional 4 volunteers should be sufficient to account forpossible withdrawals and the exclusion of outlier values. Prospectivevolunteers will be informed of the aims, methodology and risks of thetrial and be asked to provide written consent.

Volunteers need to be between 16 and 65 years of age, not diabetic orsuffering from haemophilia, renal or hepatic disease, not having a knownfood allergy, hypersensitivity or intolerance to cereal foods (eg celicsprue), are not taking medications known to influence glucose tolerance(oral contraceptives are excluded), and have a fasting blood glucoselevel between 3.5 and 6.0 mmol/l. In these respects, volunteers arenormal and healthy. Persons considered by the investigator to beunwilling, unlikely or unable to comprehend or comply with the studyprotocol will be excluded, as will those who have participated inanother research study within 30 days prior to the commencement of theproposed study. Prospective volunteers will be pre-screened on the basisof their fasting blood glucose levels between 3.5 and 6.0 mmol/l.Subjects whose fasting blood glucose is abnormally high will receivewritten notification advising them to undergo a glucose tolerance testand to consult their doctor.

Subjects are required to present at the clinic in the fasting state.Subjects are not permitted to consume food or drink, other than water,for a minimum of 10 hours before each test, have no alcohol or legumeson the previous evening, and must not undertake vigorous exerciseimmediately prior to or during the test. Two blood samples will be takenwithin 5 minutes of each other and analysed for glucose and the averageresult shall be taken as the baseline blood glucose concentration.Capillary (finger prick) whole blood will be collected on each occasion.

Specific quantities of the foods will be fed to the volunteers. Fourwheat-based foods will be tested: a muffin and bread each made frommodified wheat or standard wheat (both as wholemeal flour). The test andreference foods will be fed in random order. Glucose will be thereference food: 50 g of anhydrous glucose powder dissolved in 250 ml ofwater, and the amount of carbohydrate is exactly equal to that of thetest food portion. The reference food is to be tested in each subjectthree times on separate days within the immediate 3-month periodsurrounding the testing of the breads and muffins. The test food willcontain 50 g of glycemic (available) carbohydrate and volunteers will beinstructed to eat the foods within a period of 12 min to 15 min.Subjects shall consume all the test or reference food at an even pacewithin 12 min to 15 min. They will be given 250 ml of water to consumewith the food. During testing, subjects shall rest.

The change in blood glucose concentration over the next two-hours willbe monitored according to the standardised protocol for testing the GI,based on the method published by FAO/WHO (1998). Blood samples are takenat 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min, starting immediately after the firstmouthful of food is taken. Samples are tested in duplicate for glucose.Duplicates should not vary by more than 0.3 mmol/l and additional bloodsamples may be required so that the CV is <3%. Blood glucose will bedetermined using a spectrophotometric technique which has an inter-assayco-efficient variation on standard solutions of <3.0%.

GI is determined as the glycemic response, measured as the incrementalarea under the blood glucose response curve after consumption of astandard amount (usually 50 or 25 g of carbohydrate, in this trial 50 g)of the test food, expressed as a percentage of the average glycemicresponse (IAUC) to an identical amount of carbohydrate from a referencefood (glucose) consumed by the same subject on a separate occasion.

Calculations

The blood glucose response curve (concentration versus time) is plottedand the area under the curve calculated geometrically by applying thetrapezoid rule. The area beneath the fasting concentration is ignored inthe calculation of GI. Glucose is used as the reference food and bydefinition has a GI of 100. GI of the test food for an

${{individual}\mspace{14mu} {subject}} = {\frac{{Integrated}\mspace{14mu} {area}\mspace{14mu} {of}\mspace{14mu} {glucose}\mspace{14mu} {response}\mspace{14mu} {curve}\mspace{14mu} {for}\mspace{14mu} {Test}\mspace{14mu} {food}}{{Integrated}\mspace{14mu} {area}\mspace{14mu} {of}\mspace{14mu} {glucose}\mspace{14mu} {response}\mspace{14mu} {curve}\mspace{14mu} {for}\mspace{14mu} {Reference}} \times 100}$

GI of the Test Food=Mean GI of ≧10 volunteers.

Analysis of variance will be used to determine whether foods made frommodified wheat have a significantly lower GI. The wholemeal foods madefrom the standard wheat are expected to have quite a high GI (>70)whereas the corresponding foods containing modified wheat are expectedto register a lower GI, less than or equal to 69, most likely less than60.

Example 16 Determination of the Resistant Starch Content of CerealProducts in Human Volunteers

Resistant starch (RS) is starch which resists upper gut digestion andenters the large bowel. Quantitatively, it is a major source offermentable substrate for the colonic microflora, which convert starchto metabolites believed critical to the health and metabolic welfare ofthe large bowel wall. In particular, bacterial fermentation of certaintypes of resistant starch favour production of SCFA such as butyrate, amajor organic acid which is attracting considerable attention because ofits capacity to promote programmed cell death and related processes thatmay protect against colon cancer by eliminating cells that have becomedysfunctional.

To test whether the modified wheat having elevated amylose is lesssusceptible to digestive breakdown in the upper gut, a feeding trialwill be carried out in human ileostomy subjects. In particular, thestudy will accurately determine the resistant starch content of typicalfoods prepared from high amylose wheat flour. The only effective way tomeasure resistant starch in foods in humans (in vivo) is to usevolunteers with a permanent and well-functioning ileostomy. Theileostomy model technique is widely regarded as a reliable approach forassessing upper gut assimilation of dietary constituents.

The protocol is straightforward and simply involves feeding a number ofhealthy ileostomists the various test foods made from high amylose wheator the corresponding low amylose wheat as a control. Recovery of starchand starch hydrolysates from the small bowel will then be determinedusing a standard analytical technique for total starch.

Volunteers will be recruited from an existing pool of subjects recruitedpreviously or via stomal nurses at local hospitals. Subjects who may beincluded in the trial are aged 20-80 years, male or female, notreceiving any medication likely to modulate small intestinal function orthat could interfere with the study in the opinion of the investigator,do not have history of alcohol or drug abuse, have not used anyexperimental drug within 30 days of commencement of the study, and donot have gastrointestinal, renal, hepatic disease or intestinalinflammation. They must have had minimal terminal ileum removed (<10 cm)and have a conventional and well-functioning permanent ileostomy. Theymust be willing to comply with alcohol and diet restrictions in thestudy.

Exclusion criteria include: use of any form of drug therapy ormedication or supplements on a regular basis that may interfere withbowel function, definite or suspected personal history or family historyof adverse events or intolerance of starchy or other foods, pregnantwomen or sexually active female subjects able to conceive and practicinginadequate contraception, persons considered by the investigator to beunwilling, unlikely or unable to comprehend or comply with the studyprotocol and restrictions, persons unwilling or unable to collect ilealeffluent as required, and subjects taking any supplements which couldinterfere with study parameters. Subjects will be asked to providewritten consent after being provided with the appropriate information.

At least eight volunteers will be recruited. Statistical calculationsreveal that a minimum of 6 subjects are required if there is to be an80% chance of detecting a 200% increase in ileal starch excretion abovebaseline (α=0.05). Basal starch excretion for day 1 should be about 0.5g. Consumption of a standard serving portion of a cereal product (˜60 g)made from modified cereal and containing 4% resistant starch is expectedto yield an additional 2.4 g of starch at the terminal ileum. Therefore,on day 2, it is anticipated that total starch recovery will be in theorder of nearly 3 g, a 5-fold increase over baseline.

Before the study commences, volunteers will be given detailedinstructions about the study. Volunteers will carry out each study intheir own homes. The study consists of a series of three 48-hour feedingtrials over a period of 3 weeks. Volunteers will be on a low starch dietfor two consecutive days (usually Tuesday and Wednesday) during whichthey collect the entire contents of their ileostomy bag at specifiedintervals, as described in detail below. The basal diet will be designedby a dietitian to be low in resistant starch and will be tailored tomeet individual needs. Therefore, foods such as wholegrain breads,bananas, breakfast cereals, legumes and other foods that containresistant starch, other than the test foods, will be avoided. On thesecond day they are also required to eat one of the test foods.Approximately 50-100 g of the cereal product (about a medium to largeserving) will be eaten at 7:30 am on day 2.

Foods to be consumed for the study will be sourced from localsupermarkets and delivered to the volunteers prior to the start of eachstudy. Volunteers will prepare their own meals in accordance withdetailed instructions. The modified cereal products will be produced bya commercial cereals manufacturer. Fluids (water, tea, coffee, but notalcohol) may be consumed freely by volunteers. Intake of the requiredfoods will be closely monitored during the active phase of the study.Energy and macronutrient intake will be measured during study periods,estimated from food diaries. Meals will be eaten, and ileostomy bagsemptied completely and contents collected, according to the followingplan:

-   -   Day 1. Basal diet.

Contents of ileostomy bag will be collected at 7 am and frozen on dryice. The foods for the basal diet will be eaten for breakfast (7.30 am),morning tea (10.30 am), lunch (12.30 pm), afternoon tea (3.30 pm) anddinner (6.30 pm). Contents of the ileostomy bag will be collected at twohourly intervals after 7.00 am until 11 pm and frozen.

-   -   Day 2. Basal diet plus test food for breakfast. An identical        pattern will be followed except that test foods (50-100 g) will        be substituted for an equivalent amount of the basal diet.    -   Day 3. Collection of ileostomy bag contents at 7.00 am.

At each sampling point, volunteers will dispense the entire contents oftheir ileostomy bags into appropriately labeled containers, which theythen seal and place immediately into insulated coolers containing dryice. Samples will be collected daily from the homes of volunteers andstored frozen (−20° C.) until analysis.

The assays to be carried out on ileal digesta are: output, which is thewet weight of each sample and daily output, moisture content, starchcontent, maltose content, glucose content, SCFA content and pH. Starchhydrolysates (free glucose & maltose) will be analysed because theyoriginate from starch but have escaped digestion and are therefore acomponent of the resistant starch fraction.

Short-chain fatty acids and pH provide general information on themetabolic activity microflora of the distal small intestine. Ilealmicrobial activity in these individuals is a possible source ofvariation in starch digestibility.

An example of the basal diet is as follows:

Nutrients (Mean all Days) Energy: 8595.19 kJ Carbohydrate: 232.29 gStarch: 58.65 g Protein: 97.94 g Dietary Fibre: 19.11 g Total Fat: 84.06g Total Sugars: 168.69 g Energy Ratios (Mean all Days) Protein: 20% Fat:37% Carbohydrate: 44% Alcohol: 0% Fat Ratios (Mean all Days) Poly: 12%Mono: 38% Saturated: 51%

Energ Ptn Fat Carb Fibre Sugar Stch M1 Food/Recipe Amnt Measure kJ g g gg g g juice, orange, commercial, ns 100.00 g 142 1 0 8 0 7 0 fruitsalad, can-pear juice 200.00 g 354 1 0 20 3 17 0 milk, reduced fat,fortified 200.00 g 418 8 3 11 0 11 0 coffee powder, instant 1.00 tsp 4 00 0 0 0 0 sugar 5.00 g 84 0 0 5 0 5 0 cheese, cheddar 20.00 g 338 5 7 00 0 0 cracker, water 4.00 biscuit 291 2 2 12 0 0 12 water, plain,drinking 250.00 g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 croissant 1.00 average 1066 6 15 23 2 320 ham, leg, non-canned, lean 50.00 g 226 9 2 0 0 0 0 salad 50.00 g 26 00 1 1 1 0 french dressing, commercial 20.00 g 220 0 5 2 0 2 0 custard,commercial 150.00 g 588 5 4 21 0 17 3 apple, stewed, added sugar 150.00g 513 0 0 31 2 31 0 coffee powder, instant 1.00 tsp 4 0 0 0 0 0 0biscuit, shortbread 3.00 biscuit 927 3 11 28 1 9 19 milk, reduced fat,fortified 50.00 g 104 2 1 3 0 3 0 sugar 5.00 g 84 0 0 5 0 5 0 chicken,breast, raw, lean 200.00 g 938 45 5 0 0 0 0 carrot, mature, peeled,boiled 100.00 g 112 1 0 6 4 6 0 broccoli, frozen, boiled 50.00 g 46 1 01 2 1 0 oil, canola 10.00 g 370 0 10 0 0 0 0 ice cream, vanilla 50.00 g400 2 6 10 0 10 0 apricot, can-pear juice 150.00 g 266 1 0 14 3 12 0chocolate, milk 50.00 g 1075 4 14 31 0 28 3 Total: 8595 98 84 232 19 16959

Discussion

A variable fraction of the starch that is eaten is not broken down inthe upper alimentary tract. The undigested (resistant) starch enters thecolon (large bowel) where it has a number of purported benefits, whichare largely effected through the actions of the complex assemblage ofbacteria that inhabit that region of the gut. In utilising starch,colonic bacteria elaborate organic acids which serve a variety ofcritical health-related functions. These include providing a much neededenergy source for cells lining the bowel, promoting and controlling gutmucosal growth, and halting proliferation of cells that have undergoneneoplastic transformation. For individuals on diets considered to behigh risk for colorectal cancer and certain other serious degenerativediseases of the large bowel, these benefical bacterial metabolites areoften in short supply. Population studies have shown that the incidenceof large bowel cancer diminishes with increased starch consumption (andby implication, resistant starch). The protective effect of resistantstarch in this regard appear to be greater than that of dietary fibre.Systemic health also appears to benefit from resistant starch, howeverin this case the benefits are mediated through its physiological actionsin the small bowel. By consuming foods rich in resistant starch, energyintake and glycemic index are reduced. Weight loss may also befacilitated through a resistant starch-induced increase in basalmetabolic rate.

In humans, small intestinal digestion appears to be the rate limitingstep in starch assimilation, and it is essentially governed by severalkey physiological factors, the most important of which are masticationand small intestinal digesta transit. Resistant starch is clearly aphysiological entity—it is a product of a variety of physiologicalprocesses acting in concert. As such it is not an innate physicalconstituent of starchy foods.

REFERENCES

-   Abel et al., (1996). The Plant Journal 10: 981-991.-   Anderson et al., (1989). Nucl Acids Res 17: 461-462.-   Baba et al., (1991). Biochem Biophys Res Commun 181: 87-94.-   Batey and Curtin. (1996). Starch 48: 338-344.-   Batey et al., (1997). Cereal Chemistry 74: 497-501.-   Becker et al., (1994). Plant J. 5:299-307.-   Blauth et al., (2001). Plant Physiology 125: 1396-1405.-   Bourque. (1995). Plant Science 105: 125-149.-   Boyer and Preiss, (1978). Carbohydrate Research 61: 321-334.-   Boyer and Preiss, (1981). Plant Physiology 67: 1141-1145.-   Boyer et al., (1980). Starch 32: 217-222.-   Buleon et al., (1998). International Journal of Biological    Macromolecules 23:85-112.-   Cao et al., (1999). Plant Physiol 120: 205-215.-   Cao et al., (2000). Archives. of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 373:    135-146.-   Case et al., (1998). Journal of Cereal Science 27: 301-314.-   Cheng et al., (1997). Plant Physiol 115: 971-980.-   Craig et al., (1998). Plant Cell 10: 413-426.-   Denyer et al., (1995). Planta 196: 256-265.-   Denyer et al., (1996). Plant Physiology 112: 779-785.-   Ewen and Pusztai (1999). Lancet 354: 1353-1354.-   Feldman. pp 3-56 in The World Wheat Book, A history of wheat    breeding. Eds Bonjean and Angus, Lavoisier Publishing, Paris.-   Ferguson. 1994. pp 55-77 in “Speciality Corns” eds, CRC Press Inc.-   Fisher et al., (1993). Plant Physiol 102:1045-1046.-   Fisher et al., (1996). Plant Physiol 110: 611-619.-   Fuwa et al., (1999). Starch/Starke. 51: 147-151.-   Gao et al., (1997). Plant Physiol 114: 69-78.-   Gao et al., (1998). Plant Cell 10: 399-412.-   Giroux and Hannah. (1994). Molecular and General Genetics 243:    400-408.-   Green et al., (1997). Plant Physiology 114: 203-212.-   He et al., (1994). Plant Cell Reports 14: 192-196.-   Hedman and Boyer, (1982). Biochemical Genetics 20: 483-492.-   Hess et al., (1990). Plant Science 72: 233-244.-   James et al., (1995). Plant Cell 7: 417-429.-   Jobling et al., (1999). Plant Journal 18: 163-171.-   Komari et al., (1996). Plant Journal 10: 165-174.-   Konik-Rose et al (2001) Starch 53: 14-20.-   Krueger et al., (1987). Cereal Chemistry 64: 187-190.-   Kubo et al., (1999). Plant physiology. 121: 399-409.-   Li et al., (1999a). Plant physiology. 120: 1147-1155.-   Li et al., (1999b). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 98: 1208-1216.-   Li et al., (2000). Plant Physiology 123: 613-624.-   Li et al., (2003). Funct Integr Genomics 3: 76-85.-   Libessart et al., (1995). Plant Cell 7: 1117-1127.-   McCreery and Helentjaris (1994). Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol.    28: Protocols for nucleic acid analysis by non-radioactive probes,    67-71, Humana Press Inc., Totawa, N.J.-   Mizuno et al., (1993). Journal of Biological Chemistry 268:    19084-19091.-   Mizuno et al., (1992). Journal of Biochemistry 112: 643-651.-   Morell et al., (1997). Plant Physiology 113: 201-208.-   Morell et al., (1998). Electrophoresis 19: 2603-2611.-   Morell et al., (2003). Plant J. 34: 173-185.-   Morrison and Laignelet (1983). Journal of Cereal Science 1: 9-20.-   Mullins et al., (1999). European Journal of Plant Pathology 105:    465-475.-   Myers et al., (2000). Plant Physiology 122: 989-997.-   Nakamura (2002). Plant Cell Physiology 43: 718-725.-   Nakamura and Yamanouchi (1992). Plant Physiol 99: 1265-1266.-   Nair et al., (1997). Plant Sci 122: 153-163.-   Nehra et al., (1994). Plant J. 5: 285-297.-   Ng et al., (1997) Cereal Chemistry 74: 288-292.-   Nishi et al., (2001). Plant Physiology 127: 459-472.-   Rahman et al., (1995). Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 22:    793-803.-   Rahman et al., (1997). Genome 40: 465-474.-   Rahman et al., (1999). Theor Appl Genet. 98: 156-163.-   Rahman et al., (2000). J Cereal Sci 31: 91-110.-   Rahman et al., (2001). Plant Physiol 125: 1314-1324.-   Repellin et al., (1997). Plant Gene Reg 97-094-   Schulman and Kammiovirta. (1991). Starch 43: 387-389.-   Senior (1998). Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews 15:    79-119.-   Shannon and Garwood, (1984). In Starch: Chemistry and Technology,    Whistler et al., eds, Academic Press, Orlando, Fla., pp 25-86.-   Shure et al., (1983). Cell 35: 225-233.-   Sidebottom et al., (1998). Journal of Cereal Science 27: 279-287.-   Slade et al. (2005). Nat Biotech. 23: 75-81.-   Stacey and Isaac (1994). Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 28:    Protocols for nucleic acid analysis by non-radioactive probes, pp    9-15, Humana Press Inc., Totawa, N.J.-   Sun et al., (1997). The New Phytologist 137: 215-215.-   Sun et al., (1998). Plant Physiol 118: 37-49.-   Takeda et al., (1993a). Carbohydrate Research 240: 253-262.-   Takeda et al., (1993b). Carbohydrate Research 246: 273-281.-   Thomas and Atwell 1999 Starches Eagen Press, St Paul, Minn., USA pp:    13-24.-   Thorbjomsen et al., (1996). Plant Journal 10: 243-250.-   Vasil et al., (1992). Bio/Technology 10: 667-674.-   Vasil et al., (1993). Bio/Technology 11: 1553-1558.-   Wang et al., (1998). Journal of Experimental Botany 49: 481-502.-   Weeks et al., (1993). Plant Physiol 102: 1077-1084.-   Wegener et al., 1994. Mol. Gen Genet. 245: 465-470.-   Weir et al., (2001). Aust J Plant Physiol 28: 807-818.-   Yamamori and Endo, (1996). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 93:    275-281.-   Yamamori et al., (2000). Theor. Appl. Genet. 101: 21-29-   Young. (1984). in Whistler et al. (eds), Academic Press, Orlando,    Fla., chap 8.-   Zhao and Sharp, (1998). Plant Breeding 117: 488-490.-   Zikiryaeva and Kasimov. (1972). Uzbekrkii Biologicheskii Zhurnal    6:18-20.-   Zwar and Chandler, (1995). Planta 197: 39-48.

1-37. (canceled)
 38. A process for producing a food or beverage,comprising the steps of obtaining wheat grain having a proportion ofamylose in its starch of at least 30% (w/w), at least 1% of the starchbeing resistant starch, and a reduced level of starch branching enzymeIIa (SBEIIa) relative to wild-type wheat grain, optionally processingthe grain to produce flour, wholemeal, semolina or starch, and mixingthe grain, flour, wholemeal, semolina or starch with another ingredient,thereby producing the food or beverage.
 39. The process of claim 38,wherein the proportion of amylose in the starch of the grain is at least40% (w/w).
 40. The process of claim 38, wherein the starch of the grainhas a chain length distribution in its amylopectin which exhibits areduced proportion of the DP 4-12 chain length fraction relative to theamylopectin of wild-type wheat grain when measured after isoamylasedebranching of the amylopectin.
 41. The process of claim 38, wherein thestarch of the grain has an increased gelatinisation temperature relativeto starch of wild-type wheat grain, as measured by differential scanningcalorimetry.
 42. The process of claim 38, wherein said grain comprises areduced level of starch branching enzyme IIb (SBEIIb) protein, enzymeactivity or both relative to wild-type grain.
 43. The process of claim38, wherein the starch of the grain comprises at least 2% (w/w)resistant starch.
 44. The process of claim 38, wherein the wheat grainis of the species Triticum aestivum ssp: aestivum or Triticum turgidumL. ssp. durum.
 45. The process of claim 38, wherein the grain which ismixed with another ingredient is whole grain.
 46. The process of claim38, wherein the grain which is mixed with another ingredient is milled,ground, pearled, rolled, kibbled, par-boiled or cracked grain.
 47. Theprocess of claim 38 which is a process for producing a food, wherein thefood is selected from the group consisting of bread, cake, biscuits,breakfast cereal, noodles, sauce, soup, pasta, pancake mix and cake mix.48. The process of claim 38 which is a process for producing bread,wherein the grain, flour, wholemeal, semolina or starch is added duringpreparation of the bread and is blended with wild-type wheat starch inthe form of grain, flour or wholemeal, and wherein at least 10% of thetotal starch in the bread is in the grain, flour, wholemeal, semolina orstarch.
 49. The process of claim 38 further comprising the step ofheating or baking the grain or flour, wholemeal or starch obtained fromthe grain to at least 60° C. for at least ten minutes one or more timesafter the mixing step.
 50. The process of claim 38, wherein theamylopectin of the grain comprises 42.27% DP 13-24 chain length fractionwhen measured by fluorophore assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis afterisoamylase debranching of the amylopectin.
 51. The process of claim 38further comprising the step of packaging the food or beverage so that itis ready for sale.
 52. A food or beverage comprising wheat grain havinga proportion of amylose in its starch of at least 30% (w/w), at least 1%of the starch being resistant starch, and a reduced level of starchbranching enzyme IIa (SBEIIa) relative to wild-type wheat grain, orflour, wholemeal, semolina or starch produced from the grain, andanother ingredient.